Index

Alison Pilnick (University of Nottingham, UK)

Reconsidering Patient Centred Care

ISBN: 978-1-80071-744-2, eISBN: 978-1-80071-743-5

Publication date: 23 August 2022

This content is currently only available as a PDF

Citation

Pilnick, A. (2022), "Index", Reconsidering Patient Centred Care, Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 149-152. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80071-743-520221008

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2022 Alison Pilnick. Published under exclusive licence by Emerald Publishing Limited


INDEX

Abandonment
, 4, 23, 65–67, 85, 99–107, 115, 121

Activity contamination
, 47

Activity-passivity model
, 9

Advice giver category
, 73–75, 84, 87

Advice giving
, 33, 72–73, 75, 84

Affective neutrality
, 86

Affirmative care
, 107, 108, 114

Affordable Care Act
, 13

Agency, human
, 29

Agency, patient or client
, 20–21, 29, 35, 79–81, 88–89, 116, 130

Agenda setting, patient or client led
, 51–55, 84

Amniocentesis
, 64, 69, 103

Antimicrobial resistance
, 43–46, 61

Asymmetry, in doctor patient encounter
, 8, 20, 24, 72, 89, 90–91, 98, 121, 123, 125

Auspicious interpretation
, 69–70, 75, 104

Authority

deontic
, 85, 92–94, 97, 99, 101, 102, 105–106, 121, 125

epistemic
, 85, 93, 94, 97, 99, 101, 104, 121, 125

Autonomy
, 10, 99–107

and individual choice
, 7, 21–22, 24–25, 37, 42, 46, 51, 85, 113–115

limits of
, 115–117

and professionalism
, 22–23

rise of
, 20–21

Autonomy, patient
, 7, 10, 20–23, 65, 67, 115–116, 118

Autonomy, relational
, 22, 42, 59, 115–116

Balint, Enid
, 8

Balint, Michael
, 7–8, 121–122

Balint’s approach
, 8

Beneficence
, 21, 76, 82, 84, 115

Bio-psychosocial perspective
, 8, 12

Bioethical approach
, 21

Bioethics
, 17, 21, 76

Broad questions, use of
, 10, 48–51

Capacity, for self-determination
, 21, 24, 35, 38, 108, 116

Checklist-based approaches
, 4, 18, 20, 27, 35, 51, 58, 67, 76, 111, 117–118, 124–125

Choice, as an ideological device
, 118

Choice, consumer
, 24, 113–115, 118

Choice, individual
, 7, 21–22, 24–25, 37, 42, 46, 51, 85, 113–115

Choice, patient
, 15, 22, 35, 45, 58, 61, 83, 92, 105, 113–115

Choice concept
, 101

Choice in context
, 117–119

Choice-centred conceptualisation of medicine
, 85

Chronic illness
, 9, 72, 86, 97–99

Chronic illness context, expertise in
, 97–99

Client-led agenda setting
, 51–55

Clinical judgement
, 100–101

Clinical practice guidelines
, 115–116

Co-design, of services and care pathways
, 122

Code and count tradition
, 11

Communication

impairments
, 76

problem of communication in healthcare
, 41–42

skills training
, 33, 49, 76, 112

Complicity of social science
, 119–122

Concordance
, 10

Conflict

limitations of training as solution to interactional conflict in healthcare
, 83–84

problem of managing conflicting moral norms in interaction
, 76–83

Constituting expertise in interaction
, 94–97

Consumer choice, limitations as applied to healthcare
, 113–115

Consumer
, 14, 24, 112

Consumerism
, 5, 14, 24, 108, 112, 113, 114, 122

Consumerist models of medicine
, 114

Context, expertise in
, 117–119

Control, of healthcare interactions
, 12, 16, 21, 35–37, 44–46, 54, 61, 63, 67, 68, 83, 88–92

Conversation analysis (CA)
, 27, 101

as method for studying healthcare interactions
, 28–33

research in primary care
, 91

specific contribution of
, 123–125

COVID-19 vaccination
, 85

Cultural relativity
, 120

Decision making, bilateral
, 106

Decision making, distributed
, 119

Decision making, shared
, 3, 7, 15–20, 35, 46, 59, 67, 92, 101, 104, 106, 111, 118, 123

Decision making, unilateral
, 106

Deontic authority
, 85, 92–94, 97, 99, 101, 102, 105–106, 121, 125

Diagnosis/treatment-oriented interaction
, 14

Doctor-as-person
, 12

Doctor–patient interaction
, 28, 31, 50, 88–92, 117

Doctor–patient relationship
, 3, 8, 9, 12, 19, 31, 36, 57, 90, 118–120

Dominance, interactional
, 89, 90–91

Doorknob phenomenon
, 48

Double bind, for professionals
, 89–90, 107

Double bind, for patients
, 89–90, 106

Effectiveness of PCC
, 14–16

Epistemic authority
, 85, 93–94, 97, 99, 101, 104, 121, 125

Epistemic primacy
, 24

Epistemic stance
, 93, 104

Epistemic status
, 93, 104

Epistemics
, 92, 101

Epistemics of experience
, 4, 85, 104, 106, 122

Epistemics of expertise
, 104, 122

Essential tension
, 70, 71

Ethnomethodology
, 29, 31, 34, 86

Eugenics
, 51, 63

Expert patient
, 115, 119

Expertise
, 85

autonomy, abandonment and
, 99–106

constituting expertise in interaction
, 94–97

in context
, 117–119

in context of chronic illness
, 97–99

Expertise by experience
, 119

Face, loss of
, 72

Face threat
, 55, 73, 81, 108

Garfinkel, Harold
, 29, 31, 34, 61

Genetic counselling
, 3, 33, 51, 66

Genetic medicine
, 51, 99

Goffman, Erving
, 31, 108, 116

Guidance-co-operation model
, 9

Habermas, Jurgen
, 10

Hall, Stuart
, 88

Health Education England
, 1

Health Foundation
, 12, 13, 21, 23, 87

Healthcare

conversation analysis as method for studying healthcare interactions
, 28–33

good organisational reasons for bad healthcare practice
, 34–35

limitations of consumer choice as applied to
, 113–115

problem of communication in
, 27–28

talk, compared with ordinary talk
, 46–48

Holism
, 8

Imperatives, moral
, 76, 82

Imperatives, organizational
, 2, 4, 27, 34–35, 41, 42, 46

Interactional conflict in healthcare
, 4, 83–84

Interactional difficulty of non-directiveness
, 62–68

Interactional dominance
, 89, 91

Interactional dysfunctions
, 47, 58–59, 71

Interactional norms
, 4, 30, 50, 61, 70, 71, 73, 75, 83, 84, 124

Interactional submission
, 91

International Alliance of Patient Organisations
, 12

Jargon, use of
, 97–98

Jefferson, Gail
, 29, 73

Legitimacy
, 21, 57, 99, 124

Logic of care
, 21, 105, 123

Logic of choice
, 21, 46, 66–67, 87, 105, 123

Meaning-making in healthcare interaction
, 64, 66

Medicine
, 97, 125–126

sociology in
, 5, 120

sociology of
, 5, 119

Mental Health Act
, 87

Mishler, Elliott
, 10, 11, 74–75, 103–104, 123

Modern Western psychiatry
, 86

Moral dimensions of healthcare
, 56, 72

Moral norms in interaction
, 30, 61, 75–83

Moral principles, in policy making
, 76, 84, 125

Mutual participation model
, 9

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
, 16, 76, 116

Neo-liberalism
, 21, 66, 88

Non-compliance
, 10, 114

Non-directiveness, interactional difficulty of
, 62–68

One-size-fits-all approach
, 9, 27, 58, 84

problem with
, 46–48, 117–119

Open-ended questions. See Broad questions

Ordinary talk as compared with healthcare talk
, 46–48

Orphan consultations
, 118

Parsons, Talcott
, 8, 20, 29, 31, 57, 86–87, 98, 111, 115

Passivity, patient
, 9, 58

Paternalism
, 11, 58, 62, 92, 97, 99, 117, 125

Patient troubles telling
, 73–75

Patient affirmation
, 85, 107–109

Patient autonomy
, 7, 10, 20–23, 65, 67, 115–116

Patient centred care (PCC)

and the complicity of social science
, 119–122

conversation analysis as method for studying
, 28–33

difficulties of distinguishing between good and bad practice
, 58–59

evidence for effectiveness of
, 14–16

and good organisational reasons for bad healthcare practice
, 34–35

and limitations of consumer choice as applied to healthcare
, 113–115

and limits of autonomy
, 115–117

person centred care vs.
, 23–26

pervasiveness of
, 26

shared decision-making and
, 16–20

Patient centred medicine (PCM)
, 2, 10–12, 16, 23, 78, 101, 111, 123

Patient Centred Outcomes Research Institute
, 13

Patient dependency
, 9

Patient engagement
, 67, 118

Patient-as-person
, 12

Patient-centredness
, 11, 14, 125

Patient-led agenda setting
, 51–55

Patient-oriented medicine
, 8, 117, 119, 122

Person centred care
, 1, 2, 7, 13, 23–26

Person-centred interaction
, 62

Personal health
, 43–46

Personhood
, 24–26, 76

Professional autonomy
, 115

Professionalism
, 86–87, 106

autonomy and
, 22–23

Progressivity
, 89, 91

Psychoanalysis
, 86

Psychotherapy
, 24, 33, 62–63, 93, 109, 117

Public health
, 42–47

Quality of shared decisions
, 17–18

Question design, the impact of
, 38, 47, 50

Refusal, of requests
, 76–78, 82

Relational autonomy
, 22, 42, 59, 116

Risk, communication of
, 33, 64

Risk, to health
, 97, 129, 136

Rogers, Carl
, 24, 62

Role convergence
, 22

Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS)
, 11

Sacks, Harvey
, 29, 73, 75

Schegloff, Emmanuel
, 29

Shared decision making (SDM)
, 3, 7, 15–20, 35, 46, 59, 67, 92, 101, 104, 106, 111, 118, 123

Sick role model
, 8, 22, 46, 57, 98, 115

Smoking cessation
, 55, 57, 61, 74

Social science, complicity of
, 119–122

Sociology in medicine
, 5, 120

Sociology of medicine
, 5, 119

Sociology of professions
, 87

Structural functionalism
, 29

Struggle for control
, 4, 16, 21, 85, 88–92, 108

Theory of communicative action, Habermas’
, 10

Theory/practice gap
, 111

Therapeutic alliance
, 12

Therapeutic citizenship
, 46

Treatment recommendations
, 32, 43, 45, 47, 88, 92, 105

Troubles telling
, 73–75

Trust
, 51, 76, 87, 117, 121

UK Department of Health
, 1, 33, 40, 71, 98, 114, 121

UK National Institute of Clinical Excellence
, 97, 116

Uncertainty
, 35, 68–71, 75, 95

US Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute
, 2

Values-based policy
, 121, 125

Voice of medicine, the
, 103

Voice of the lifeworld, the
, 10, 76, 103

Waitzkin, Howard
, 28, 32, 44, 123

World Health Organisation (WHO)
, 23, 43