Index
Ecologically-compatible Urban Planning
ISBN: 978-1-78973-784-4, eISBN: 978-1-78973-783-7
Publication date: 18 October 2019
This content is currently only available as a PDF
Citation
Salata, S. (2019), "Index", Ecologically-compatible Urban Planning, Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 153-158. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78973-783-720191015
Publisher
:Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2019 Stefano Salata
INDEX
Adaptable planning
, 61
Adaptation
, 14, 15, 19, 24
Aggregate polygons
, 82–83
Airborne
, 97
AIRES (Artificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services)
, 29
Air filtering services
, 95
Air quality
assessment
, 99, 102, 108
mapping
, 95–108
well-being
, 111–113
Anthropisation
, 32
ArcGis functions
, 51, 52, 81, 82, 83
Atmospheric pollution
, 89–91
Biodiversity
, 20, 21, 70, 86
Blue carbon model
, 70
Carbon storage model
, 70
Cause-effect mechanism
, 11
Circularity
, 12, 13
City. See Contemporary city
Classification of ecosystem services (CICES)
, 96
Climate change
, 18, 19, 62
circularity
, 12
control
, 12
ES provision
, 23
‘reduction,’ 12
risks
, 46
Climate resilient economy
, 61
Coastal vulnerability model
, 73
Common European Soil Framework Directive
, 46
Communication
, 3
Computational algorithms
, 30
Contemporary city
, 7–25, 27
Contemporary lifestyle
, 9
Crop pollination model
, 71–72
Cross-disciplinary integration
, 32
Cultural ES
, 21
Cultural heritage
, 22, 24
Cultural services
, 31
Data interpretation
, 53–55
Decision-making processes
, 12, 29, 36, 51
Designers of theories
, 4
‘Differential’ method
, 27–28
Digital Elevation Model
, 50
Dilution and sequestration
, 96
Discontinued urbanisation
, 8
Ecological resilience
, 18
Eco-systemic planning
, 5, 27–43, 61
human health
, 109–113
methodological coherence
, 110–111
well-being
, 111–113
Eco-systemic planning reform
, 11
agenda for urban planning
, 55–57
ecology
, 46–49
methodology
, 49–55
Ecosystem services (ES)
, 16, 19–25, 29
aggregate polygons
, 82–83
approaches
, 20
assessment
, 29, 54, 62
biophysical/economical assessment
, 68
degradation on health
, 86–91
fatalities
, 89–91
green infrastructures (GIs)
, 39–43, 65, 78–85
hotspot analysis
, 81–82
InVEST (See InVEST)
land use change (LUC) measurement
, 64, 65
multipart data to network design
, 80–81
Natural Capital
, 67, 70
planning purposes
, 30
provision
, 28
resilience
, 123–126
sustainability
, 122–123
theoretical stage
, 65
urban planning
, 30–39
weighted overlay tool
, 81
Enhancing resilience
, 18
Environmental problems
, 62
Environmental standards
, 62, 63
Equilibrium
, 18, 19
Erosion reduction model
, 72
European Commission
, 47
European Soil Thematic Strategy
, 47
Fertile soils
, 9
Fitness for use concepts
, 66
‘Fows’ method
, 28
Geographic Information System (GIS)
, 27, 100
GIs. See Green Infrastructures (GIs)
Green Infrastructures (GIs)
, 65
aggregate polygons
, 82–83
application
, 42
definition
, 22, 40
design
, 22, 53
effects
, 24
hotspot analysis
, 81–82
multi-functionality
, 23
multipart data to network design
, 80–81
urban open spaces
, 41
weighted overlay tool
, 81
Habitat risk assessment model
, 70
Hotspot analysis
, 43, 52, 81–82, 83
Hydropower production model
, 70
Impermeabilisation
, 32
In-depth soil knowledge
, 74
Infrastructure
, 65
Institutional vulnerability
, 25
Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST)
, 29, 36, 38, 49, 50, 62, 64, 67
decision-makers
, 68
evaluation
, 70
GIS-based ES assessment
, 67
Natural Capital
, 67, 70
User’s Guide
, 49, 67, 68–69
uses
, 49
Integrating cultural/aesthetic values
, 22
International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)
, 87
InVEST. See Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST)
Jeopardised urbanisation
, 8
Lack of resilience
, 16
Land capability classification
, 65, 66
Land take process
, 11, 40, 99
administrators and planners
, 129
culture
, 46
definition
, 96
environmental effect
, 74, 96
Green Infrastructures (GIs)
, 40
limitation
, 46
mono-disciplinary paradigm
, 65
soil consumption
, 33
Land use
, 24, 35
policies
, 33
quantitative analysis
, 28
Land use changes (LUCs)
, 27, 29, 64, 65, 68
particulate matter (PM)
, 95
Land Use Land Cover map
, 29
Land use planning
, 63–91, 136
Land Use Regression (LUR) equation
, 100
Land use suitability
, 66
Land Utilization and Capability Indicator (LUCI)
, 29
Leapfrogged urbanisation
, 8
LIFE SAM4CP programme
, 67
Limiting policy
, 65
MacHarg approach
, 55
Managed timber production model
, 72
Mapping
, 30, 34, 49
air quality
, 95–108
role
, 37–39
Marine finis aqua-cultural production model
, 73
McHarg’s approach
, 43
Methodology
, 49–55, 99–100
Metrics
, 8
Modelling
, 63–91, 100
Modern Liquidity
, 8
Multi-functionality
, 23, 52
Multivariate analysis
, 43
Natural Capital
, 12, 13, 29, 30, 63, 67, 70, 79
monetary evaluation of ecosystems
, 36
Natural resources
, 11
No-development zones
, 54
Nutrient Delivery Ratio
, 38
Nutrient retention model
, 50, 71
Overlap analysis model
, 73
Park availability
, 135
Particulate matter (PM)
flux analysis
, 99
mass concentration of airborne
, 97–98
Milan area
, 101–105
Physical gravitational theory
, 9
Planetary Urbanisation
, 7
Planning
discipline
, 8
goals
, 61
strategy
, 62
Post-modern interpretation
, 8
Private mobility
, 9
Programming
, 100
Provisioning
, 31
QGis
, 69
Quantifying ecosystem services
, 32
Radial urbanisation
, 8
Recreation and tourism model
, 72
‘Reductionist’ theory
, 12
Regulating services
, 31
Re-naturing cities
, 134
Resilience
, 29, 61
adaptation
, 14
definition
, 17, 115, 116
ecological
, 18
empirical experiment
, 120–122
enhancing
, 18
environmental disciplines
, 13
ES indicator
, 123–126
exposure
, 15
lack of resilience
, 16
limit
, 19
Natural Capital
, 13
risk
, 16–17, 116
sensitivity
, 15
sustainability
, 116–118, 119–120
uncertainty
, 116
urban ecosystem services
, 119–120
vulnerability
, 16
Responsiblities
, 128–132
Risk assessment
, 14, 25
SAM4CP research
, 88
Scenario generator
, 73
Scenic quality provision model
, 72
Scientific inductive approach
, 8
Sealed soil
, 33
Sediment retention model
, 50, 71
Sensitised population
, 135
Soil
consumption
, 27, 33
contemporary lifestyle
, 9
fertile
, 9
orographic reasons
, 9
properties
, 28
quality
, 28
sealing
, 33
vulnerability
, 32
‘Soil for fun,’ 66
Soil quality
, 97
Species-specific environmental projects
, 23
Stability
, 18
Stress
, 13
Supporting services
, 30–31
Sustainability
, 29, 40, 61
ES indicator
, 122–123
resilience
, 116–118
urban ecosystem services
, 119–120
Sustainable development
, 61
Territorial discipline
, 8
Territorial governance
, 4
Territorial planning
, 24
Testing
, 100–101
Total Ecosystem Service Value
, 111
United Nations Sustainable Development Goals
, 61
Urban biodiversity
, 20
Urban Growth Boundaries
, 54
Urban regulation
, 10
Urban resilience
, 17, 18
‘Urban transformation’ phase
, 46
Validation
, 36
Vulnerability
, 14, 15, 16, 18
ecosystems
, 24
human settlements
, 24
institutional
, 25
quantitative approaches
, 25
Water scarcity
, 48
Wave attenuation model
, 72
Wave energy production model
, 73
Well-natured water
, 134
- Prelims
- Part 1: Planning in the Contemporary City: Do Urban Plans Still Matter?
- Introduction
- 1 The Contemporary City
- 2 Towards the Paradigm of ‘Eco-systemic Planning’
- 3 Eco-systemic Planning Reform
- Part 2: Acquiring New Competencies
- Introduction
- 4 Ecosystem Service Mapping in Land Use Plans: Modelling with InVEST
- Part 3: Case Studies
- 5 Case Study One
- 6 Case Study Two: Resilience Is Not Sustainability
- 7 General Conclusions
- References
- Index