Notes

This chapter draws upon Dinerstein, A. C. (2014). The dream of dignified work: On good and bad utopias. Development and Change, 45(5), 1037–1058; Dinerstein, A. C., & Pitts, F. H. (2018). From post-work to post-capitalism? Discussing the basic income and struggles for alternative forms of social reproduction. Journal of Labor and Society, 21(4), 471–491; Pitts, F. H., & Dinerstein, A. C. (2017). Pitts, F. H., & Dinerstein, A. C. (2017b). Postcapitalism, basic income and the end of work: A critique and alternative. Bath Papers in International Development and Wellbeing (No. 55); Pitts, F. H., & Dinerstein, A. C. (2017a). Corbynism's conveyor belt of ideas: Postcapitalism and the politics of social reproduction. Capital & Class, 41(3), 423–434; and Pitts, F. H., (2020), ‘Creative Labour, Metabolic Rift and the Crisis of Social Reproduction’. in: Mark Banks, Kate Oakley (eds) Cultural Industries and the Environmental Crisis: New Approaches for Policy. Palgrave Macmillan.

Spencer, D. (2018). Fear and hope in an age of mass automation: Debating the future of work. New Technology, Work and Employment, 33, 1–12.

Dinerstein, A. C. (2019). A critical theory of hope. Critical Affirmations beyond fear. In A. C. Dinerstein, G. Vela, E. González, & J. Holloway (Eds.),Open Marxism 4. Against a closing world (pp. 33–46). London; New York, NY: Pluto Press.

Dinerstein, A. C., Pitts, F. H., & Taylor, G. (2016). A post-work economy of robots and Machines is a bad utopia for the left. The Conversation, May 23. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/a\post-work-economy-of-robots-and-machines-is-a-bad-utopia-for-the-left-59134

Dinerstein, A. C. (2017b). Co-construction or prefiguration? Rethinking the “translation” of SSE practices into policy. In P. North & M. Scott Cato (Eds.), Towards just and sustainable economies: The social and solidarity economy North and South (pp. 57–71). Bristol: Policy Press.

Santos, B. de S., & Meneses, M. P. (2020). Introduction. Epistemologies of the South - Giving voice to the diversity of the South. In B. de S. Santos & M. P. Meneses (Eds.), Knowledge orn in the Struggle. Constructing the Epistemologies of the Global South (p. xvvii). Oxon: Routledge.

Icaza, R., & Vázquez, R. (2013). Social Struggles as Epistemic Struggles. Development and Change, 44(3), 683–704.

Dinerstein, A. C. (2014). The dream of dignified work: On good and bad Utopias. Development and Change, 45(5), 1037–1058.

Dinerstein, A. C. (2017a). Concrete Utopia: (Re)producing life in, against and beyond the open veins of capital. Public Seminar, New School for Social Research, New York. Retrieved from http://www.publicseminar.org/2017/12/concreteutopia/

Dinerstein, A. C. (2015). The politics of autonomy in Latin America: The art of organising hope (p. 20). Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.

Levitas, R. (2008). Pragmatism, Utopia and Anti-Utopia. Critical Horizons, 9(1), 42–59.

Wright, E. O. (2010). Envisioning Real Utopias. London: Verso.

Wright, E. O. (2013, February). Transforming Capitalism through Real Utopias. American Sociological Review, 1–26.

Bloch, E. (1959/1986). The Principle of Hope (pp. 146). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Amsler, S. (2016). Learning Hope: An Epistemology of Possibility for Advanced Capitalist Society. In A. C. Dinerstein (Ed.), Social sciences for an-other politics. Women theorising without parachutes (pp. 19–32). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Moir (2018), p. 201.

Daly, F. (2013). The Zero Point: Encountering the Dark Emptiness of Nothingness. In P. Thompson & S. Žižek (Eds.), The Privatization of Hope: Ernst Bloch and the Future of Utopia (p. 172). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Bloch, E. (2006). Traces (pp. 18). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Moir, C. (2018). Ernst Bloch: The Principle of Hope. In B. Best, W. Bonefeld, & C. O' Kane (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Frankfurt School Critical Theory (pp. 199–215). Los Angeles, CA; London; New Delhi; Washington, DC; Melbourne: SAGE Publications.

Bloch, E. (1959/1986). The Principle of Hope (pp. 146). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Marx, K. (1871). The civil war in France.

Boldyrev, I. (2015). Ernst Bloch and his contemporaries. Locating Utopian Messianism today. London; Oxford; New York, NY; New Delhi; Sydney: Bloomsbury.

Neupert-Doppler, A. (2018). Critical Theory and Utopian Thought. In B. Best, W. Bonefeld, & C. O' Kane (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Frankfurt School Critical Theory (pp. 719). Los Angeles, CA; London; New Delhi; Singapore; Washington, DC; Melbourne: SAGE Publications.

Bronner, S. (1997). Utopian Projections: In Memory of Ernst Bloch. In J. O. Daniel & T. Moylan Not Yet: Reconsidering Ernst Bloch (pp. 177). London; New York, NY: Verso.

Boldyrev (2015), p. 33.

Dinerstein A.C. (2015).

Maeckelbergh, M. (2011). Doing is believing: Prefiguration as strategic practice. Social Movement Studies, 10(1), 1–20.

Raekstad, P. (2017). Revolutionary practice and prefigurative politics: S clarification and defense. Constellations, 2017, 9.

Neary, M. (2019). Chain Reaction: Critical Theory Needs Critical Mass—Contradiction, Crisis and the Value-Form. SERRC, September 16, Retrieved from https://social-epistemology.com/2019/09/16/chain-reaction-critical-theory-needs-critical-mass-contradiction-crisis-and-the-value-form-mike-neary/

Dinerstein, A. C. (2016). Denaturalising Society: Concrete Utopia and the prefigurative critique of political economy. In A. C. Dinerstein (Ed.), Social sciences for an-other politics. Women theorising without parachutes (pp. 49–63). Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.

Maeckelbergh, M. (2011). Doing is believing: Prefiguration as strategic practice. Social Movement Studies, 10(1), 1–20.

Dinerstein A.C. (2017b).

Dinerstein (2017b), p. 69.

Dinerstein A.C. (2015).

Dinerstein, A. C. (2013). From Corporatist to Autonomous: Unemployed Workers Organisations and the Remaking of Labour Subjectivity in Argentina. In Howell, J. (Ed.), Non-Governmental Public Action and Social Justice (Vol. 2, pp. 36–59). Houndmills; New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. See also Chatterton, P. (2005). Making autonomous geographies: Argentina's popular uprising and the “Movimiento de Trabajadores Desocupados” (Unemployed Workers Movement). Geoforum, 36, 545–556.

Mason-Deese, L. (2016). ‘Unemployed Workers’ Movements and the Territory of Social Reproduction. Journal of resistance Studies, 2, 65–99.

Dinerstein A.C. (2015).

Dinerstein, A. C. (2010). Autonomy in Latin America: Between Resistance and Integration. Echoes from the Piqueteros experience’, Community Development Journal, 45(3), 358. All quotes that follow from pages 360–361.

Dinerstein (2010), p. 359.

Zechner, M., & Hansen, B. R. (2015). Building power in a crisis of social reproduction. ROAR Magazine. Retrieved from https://roarmag.org/magazine/building-power-crisis-social-reproduction/

Dinerstein, A. C. (2017b). Co-construction or prefiguration? Rethinking the “translation” of SSE practices into policy. In P. North & M. Scott Cato (Eds.), Towards just and sustainable economies: The social and solidarity economy North and South (pp. 57–71). Bristol: Policy Press.

Dinerstein (2010), p. 360.

Dinerstein (2010), p. 364.

Dinerstein (2010), p. 364.

Mason-Desse, L. (2020). From the picket to the women's strike: Expanding the meaning of labour struggles in Argentina. Ephemera, February 2020. Retrieved from http://www.ephemerajournal.org

Dinerstein (2017a).

Weeks, K. (2011). The Problem with Work: Feminism, Marxism, Antiwork Politics and Postwork Imaginaries (pp. 230). Durham, CA; London: Duke University Press.

See Costa, H. A. (2006). The Old and the New in the New Labour Internationalism. In S. de Sousa Santos (Ed.) Another Production is Possible. Beyond the Capitalist Canon (pp. 243–276). London and New York: Verso. Lambert, R., & Webster, E. (2006). Social Emancipation and the New Labour Internationalism. In B. de Sousa Santos (Ed.), Another Production is Possible. Beyond the Capitalist Canon (pp. 279–320). London; New York, NY: Verso.

See Lang, S. M., König, C., & Regelmann, A. (Eds.). (2018) Alternatives-in-a-World-of-Crisis, Global Working Group Beyond Development, Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung Brussels Office - Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar Ecuador; also Kothari, A. (2020). Earth Vikalp Sangam: Proposal for a Global Tapestry of Alternatives. Globalizations, 17(2), 245–249. doi:10.1080/14747731.2019.1670955

Dinerstein (2010), pp. 364, 365.

Conaty, P., Bird, A., & Ross, C. (2015). Not alone. Trade union and co-operative solutions for self-employed workers. Retrieved from https://www.uk.coop/sites/default/files/uploads/attachments/not_alone_-_trade_union_and_co-operative_solutions_for_self-employed_workers_3.pdf; Taylor, M. (2017). Good work: The Taylor review of modern working practices. London: HM Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/good-work-the-taylor-review-ofmodern-working-practices

Cohen, N. S., (2012). Cultural Work as a Site of Struggle: Freelancers and Exploitation. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 10(2),141–155; Conaty et al (2015); Boffo, M. (2014). From Post- to Neo-: Whither Operaismo Beyond Hardt and Negri? Historical Materialism, 22(3–4), 425–528; Bologna, S. (2018). The Rise of the European Self-Employed Workforce. Milan: Mimesis International.

Graceffa, S., & de Heusch, S. (2017). Reinventing the world of work. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(3), 359–365; Xhauflair, V., Huybrechts, B., & Pichault, F. (2018). How Can New Players Establish Themselves in Highly Institutionalised Labour Markets? A Belgian Case Study in the Area of Project-Based Work. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 56(2), 370–394; Zanoni, P. (2018). Belgium: Reinvigorating The Self-Regulated Labour Market Model. In M. Neufind, J. O'Reilly, & F. Ranft (Eds.), Work in the Digital Age: Challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (pp. 317–332). London, New York, NY: Rowman and Littlefield. Zanoni, P. (2019). Labour Market Inclusion Through Predatory Capitalism? The “Sharing Economy,” Diversity, and the Crisis of Social Reproduction in the Belgian Coordinated Market Economy*. In P. V. Steve & A. Kovalainen (Eds.), Work and Labour in the Digital Age, Research in the Sociology of Work (Vol. 33, pp. 145–164); Fuzi, A. (2015). Co-working spaces for promoting entrepreneurship in sparse regions: The case of South Wales. Regional studies, regional science, 2(1), 462–469.

Pitts, F. H. (2019). SMart solutions for the self-employed beyond the ‘British Way’. Migration Mobilities Bristol, April 29. Retrieved from https://migration.blogs.bristol.ac.uk/2019/04/29/smart-solutions-for-the-self-employedbeyond-the-british-way/; Ross, P., Bird, A., Pitts, F. H., & Crowley, L. (2017). A new way of working for the self employed- SMart. Coops.Consultancy, December 15. Retrieved from http://www.alexbird.com/a-new-way-of-working-for-the-self employed-smart/

Neary, M., & Winn, J. (2017). Beyond Public and Private: A Framework for Co-operative Higher Education. Open Library of Humanities, 3(2), 2. doi:10.16995/olh.195; also Neary, M. (2020). Student as Producer: How do Revolutionary Teachers Teach?. Hampshire: Zero Books.

Starosta, G. (2017). Fetishism and Revolution in the Critique of Political Economy: Critical Reflections on some Contemporary Readings of Marx's Capital. Continental Thought and Theory, 1(4), 365–398.

Starosta (2017), p. 382.

Bonefeld W., & Psychopedis K. (Eds.). (2005). Human Dignity: Social Autonomy and the Critique of Capitalism. Aldershot: Ashgate; cf. Starosta (2017), p. 378.

Starosta (2017), p. 382.

Starosta (2017), p. 387.

Holloway, J. (1995a). From Scream of Refusal to Scream of Power: The Centrality of Work’. In W. Bonefeld, R. Gunn, J. Holloway, & K. Psychopedis (Eds.), Open Marxism (Vol. III, pp. 164). London: Pluto Press.

Bonefeld, W. (1994). Human Practice and Perversion: Beyond Autonomy and Structure, Common Sense, 15, 43–52. Retrieved from http://commonsensejournal.org.uk/issue-15/

Dinerstein (2015), p. 46.

Dinerstein, A.C. (2002).

Starosta (2017), pp. 388, 389; Kicillof, A., & Starosta, G. (2007). Value form and class struggle: A critique of the autonomist theory of value. Capital & Class, 31(2), 13–40.

Brassier, R. (2014). Wandering Abstraction. Mute Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.metamute.org/editorial/articles/wandering-abstraction

Starosta (2017), pp. 388, 389.

Bonefeld, W. (1987). Open Marxim. Common Sense, (1), 36–37.

Marx, K. (1973). Grundrisse (pp. 704–706). London: Penguin.

Postone, M., Hamza, A., Ruda, F. (2017). An interview with Moishe Postone: That Capital has limits does not mean it will collapse. Crisis and Critique, 3(3), 500–517.

Postone et al. (2017), p. 511.

Postone et al. (2017), p. 513.

Williams, A., & Srnicek, N. (2013). The Accelerationist Manifesto. Critical Legal Thinking. Retrieved from https://criticallegalthinking.com/2013/05/14/accelerate-manifesto-for-an-accelerationist-politics/

For critiques see Noys, B., & Galloway, A. (2014). Crash and Burn: Debating Accelerationism. 3:AM Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.3ammagazine.com/3am/crash-and-burn-debating-accelerationism/

Levitas, R. (1997). Educated Hope: Ernst Bloch on Abstract and Concrete Utopia. In J. O. Daniel & T. Moylan (Eds.), Not Yet: Reconsidering Ernst Bloch (p. 70). London; New York, NY: Verso.

Geoghegan, V. (1996). Ernst Bloch (p. 38). Abingdon: Routledge.

For critiques see Pitts, F. H. (2017b). Critiquing Capitalism Today: New Ways to Read Marx. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, and Pitts, F. H., and Cruddas, J., (2020). Pitts, F. H., & Cruddas, J. (2020). The Age of Immanence: Postoperaismo, Postcapitalism and the Forces and Relations of Production, School of Sociology. Politics, & International Studies Working Paper Series, 01–20(2020).

Woźniak, M., Jesień, K., & Klewenhagen, A. (2020). Rethinking Marxism with Ernst Bloch. Praktyka Teoretyczna, 1(35), 7–11.

Dinerstein (2015), pp. 21–22.

Bonefeld, W. (1987), p. 36.

Rehman, J. (2020). Ernst Bloch as a Philosopher of Praxis. Praktyka Teoretyczna, 1(35), 75–94.

Dinerstein (2019), p. 35.