References

Abbott, 1991 Abbott, P. (1991). Story-telling and political theory. Soundings, 74(3/4), 369–397.

Allen, 2016 Allen, A. (2016). The end of progress: Decolonizing the normative foundations of critical theory. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Arendt, 2005 Arendt, H. (2005). Truth and politics. In J. Medina & D. Wood (Eds.), Truth. Engagement across philosophical traditions (pp. 295–314). Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell.

Armingeon and Gutmann, 2014 Armingeon, K. , & Gutmann, K. (2014). Democracy in crisis? The declining cupport for national democracy in European countries, 2007–2011. European Journal of Political Research, 53(3), 423–442.

Arzheimer, 2013 Arzheimer, K. (2013). Politikverdrossenheit: Bedeutung, Verwendung und empirische Relevanz eines politikwissenschaftlichen Begriffs. Wiesbaden: Springer-Verlag.

Austin, 1975 Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words (Vol. 88). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bä chtiger and Parkinson, 2019 Bächtiger, A. , & Parkinson, J. (2019). Mapping and measuring deliberation: Towards a new deliberative quality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bagnoli, 2020 Bagnoli, C. (2020). Constructivism in metaethics. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2020 Ed.). Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/constructivism-metaethics/

Barry, 1973 Barry, B. (1973). John Rawls and the priority of liberty. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 2, 274–290.

Barry, 1989 Barry, B. (1989). Theories of justice. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Bauman, 1991 Bauman, Z. (1991). Modernity and ambivalence. Cambridge: Polity.

Baynes, 2010 Baynes, K. (2010). Deliberative democracy and public reason. Veritas, 55(1), 135–163.

Beitz, 1989 Beitz, C. R. (1989). Political equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Bellamy, 2018 Bellamy, R. (2018). Majority rule, compromise and the democratic legitimacy of referendums. Swiss Political Science Review, 24(3), 312–319.

Benhabib, 1989 Benhabib, S. (1989). Critical theory and postmodernism: On the interplay of ethics, aesthetics, and utopia in critical theory. Cardozo L. Review, 11, 1435.

Benhabib, 1994 Benhabib, S. (1994). Deliberative rationality and models of democratic legitimacy. Constellations, 1(1), 26–52.

Benhabib, 1996 Benhabib, S. (1996). Toward a deliberative model of democratic legitimacy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political (pp. 67–94). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Besch, 2013 Besch, T. M. (2013). On political legitimacy, reasonableness, and perfectionism. Public Reason, 5(1), 58–74.

Blaug, 1999 Blaug, R. (1999). Democracy, real and ideal: Discourse ethics and radical politics. Albany, NY: Suny Press.

Blaug, 2002 Blaug, R. (2002). Engineering democracy. Political Studies, 50(1), 102–116.

Blü hdorn, 2020 Blühdorn, I. (2020). The dialectic of democracy: Modernization, emancipation and the great regression. Democratization, 27(3), 389–407.

Brennan, 2017 Brennan, J. (2017). Against democracy: New preface. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Bridle, 2018 Bridle, J. (2018). New dark age: Technology and the end of the future. London: Verso.

Bü rgergutachten, 2019 Bürgergutachten . (2019). Citizens‘ report: Recommendations from the German citizen assembly on the future of democracy in Sept. 2019 . Retrieved from https://www.mehr-demokratie.de/fileadmin/pdf/Buergerrat/2019-11-07_Bu__rgergutachten_Web.pdf

Buchanan, 2002 Buchanan, A. (2002). Political legitimacy and democracy. Ethics, 112(4), 689–719.

Bussu and Bua, 2020 Bussu, S. , & Bua, A. (2020). Between governance-driven democratisation and democracy-driven governance: Explaining changes in participatory governance in the case of Barcelona. European Journal of Political Research. doi:10.1111/1475–6765.12421

Buyx et al., 2017 Buyx, A. , Del Savio, L. , Prainsack, B. , & Völzke, H. (2017). Every participant is a PI. Citizen science and participatory governance in population studies. International Journal of Epidemiology, 46(2), 377–384.

Caldwell, 1997 Caldwell, P. C. (1997). Popular sovereignty and the crisis of German constitutional law: The theory & practice of Weimar constitutionalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Caluwaerts and Reuchamps, 2015 Caluwaerts, D. , & Reuchamps, M. (2015). Strengthening democracy through bottom-up deliberation: An assessment of the internal legitimacy of the G1000 project. Acta Politica, 50(2), 151–170.

Carrier and Roggenhofer, 2007 Carrier, M., & Roggenhofer, J. (2007). Wandel oder Niedergang. Die Rolle der Intellektuellen in der Wissensgesellschaft. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.

Celikates, 2015 Celikates, R. (2015). Democratizing civil disobedience. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 42(10), 982–994.

Ceva, 2012 Ceva, E. (2012). Beyond legitimacy. Can proceduralism say anything relevant about justice? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 15(2), 183–200.

Chambers, 2006 Chambers, S. (2006). The politics of equality: Rawls on the barricades. Perspectives on Politics, 4, 81–89.

Chambers, 2012 Chambers, S. (2012). Deliberation and mass democracy. In J. Mansbridge & J. Parkinson (Eds.), Deliberative systems: Deliberative democracy at the large scale (pp. 52–71). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chambers, 2019 Chambers, S. (2019). Democracy and constitutional reform: Deliberative versus populist constitutionalism. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 45(9–10), 1116–1131.

Cheneval and el-Wakil, 2018 Cheneval, F. , & el-Wakil, A. (2018). The institutional design of referendums: Bottom-up and binding. Swiss Political Science Review, 24(3), 294–304.

Chou, 2013 Chou, M. (2013). Theorising democide: Why and how democracies fail. London: Palgrave.

Christiano, 2004 Christiano, T. (2004). The authority of democracy. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 12(3), 266–290.

Christiano, 2012 Christiano, T. (2012). Rational deliberation among experts and citizens. In J. Mansbridge & J. Parkinson (Eds.), Deliberative systems: Deliberative democracy at large scale. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Clark and Gintis, 1978 Clark, B. , & Gintis, H. (1978). Rawlsian justice and economic systems. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 7, 302–325.

Clifford, 2012 Clifford, S. (2012). Making disability public in deliberative democracy. Contemporary Political Theory, 11, 211–228.

Cohen, 1986 Cohen, J. (1986). An epistemic conception of democracy. Ethics, 97(1), 26–38.

Cohen, 1997 Cohen, J. (1997). Procedure and substance in deliberative democracy. In J. Bohman & W. Rehg (Eds.), Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics (pp. 407–437). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Collings, 2015 Collings, J. (2015). Democracy's guardians: A history of the German Federal constitutional court 1951–2001. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Condorcet, 1785 Condorcet, M. de (1785). Essai sur l’application de l’analyse a la probabilité des decisions rendues a la pluralité des voix. Paris: Retrieved from https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k417181.image

Cooke, 2001 Cooke, M. (2001). Meaning and truth in Habermas's pragmatics. European Journal of Philosophy, 9(1), 1–23.

Crozier et al., 1975 Crozier, M. J. , Huntington, S. P. , & Watanuki, J. (1975). The crisis of democracy. Report on the governability of democracies to the Trilateral Commission. New York, NY: New York University Press.

Curato and Niemeyer, 2013 Curato, N. , & Niemeyer, S. (2013). Reaching out to overcome political apathy: Building participatory capacity through deliberative engagement. Politics & Policy, 41(3), 355–383.

Curato, 2019 Curato, N. (2019). Democracy in a time of misery: From spectacular tragedies to deliberative action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dacombe and Fleuß, forthcoming Dacombe, R. , & Fleuß, D. (In prep.). How should we research deliberative democracy? A problem-oriented approach to bridging theory and method – and a plea for methodological pluralism.

Dahl, 1971 Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven, CT; London: Yale University Press.

Davies, 2016 Davies, W. (2016). The limits of neoliberalism: Authority, sovereignty and the logic of competition. London: SAGE Publications.

De Cleen, 2017 De Cleen, B. (2017). Populism, exclusion, post-truth. Some conceptual caveats. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 6, 1–4.

Dean et al., 2019 Dean, R., Rinne, J., & Geissel, B. (2019). Systematizing democratic systems approaches: Seven conceptual building blocks. Democratic Theory, 6(2), 41–57.

Dean et al., 2020 Dean, R. J. , Boswell, J. , & Smith, G. (2020). Designing democratic innovations as deliberative systems: The ambitious case of NHS citizen. Political Studies, 68(3), 689–709.

Dean, 2018 Dean, R. J. (2018). Counter-governance: Citizen participation beyond collaboration. Politics and Governance, 6(1), 180–188.

Della Porta and Felicetti, 2019 Della Porta, D. , & Felicetti, A. (2019). Innovating democracy against democratic stress in Europe: Social movements and democratic experiments. Representation, 1–18. doi:10.1080/00344893.2019.1624600

Della Porta, 2013 Della Porta, D. (2013). Can democracy be saved? Participation, deliberation and social movements. Milton Park: Polity.

Dewey, 2018 [1938] Dewey, J. (2018 [1938]). Logic: The theory of inquiry. Worcestershire: Holt Press.

Dryzek and Niemeyer, 2008 Dryzek, J. S. , & Niemeyer, S. (2008). Discursive representation. American Political Science Review, 481–493.

Dryzek et al., 2019 Dryzek, J. S. , Bächtiger, A. , Chambers, S. , Cohen, J. , Druckman, J. N. , Felicetti, A. , … Landemore, H. (2019). The crisis of democracy and the science of deliberation. Science, 363(6432), 1144–1146.

Dryzek et al., 2020 Dryzek, J. S. , Nicol, D. , Niemeyer, S. , Pemberton, S. , Curato, N. , Bächtiger, A. , … Burgio, G. (2020). Global citizen deliberation on genome editing. Science, 369(6510), 1435–1437.

Dryzek, 1987 Dryzek, J. S. (1987). Discursive designs: Critical theory and political institutions. American Journal of Political Science, 31(3), 656–679.

Dryzek, 1990 Dryzek, J. S. (1990). Discursive democracy: Politics, policy, and political science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dryzek, 1996 Dryzek, J. S. (1996). The informal logic of institutional design. In R. E. Goodin (Ed.), The theory of institutional design (pp. 103–125). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dryzek, 2002 Dryzek, J. S. (2002). Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dryzek, 2010 Dryzek, J. S. (2010). Foundations and Frontiers of deliberative governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dworkin, 1988 Dworkin, G. (1988). Paternalism. Some second thoughts. In The theory and practice of autonomy (pp. 121–129). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dworkin, 1999 Dworkin, R. (1999). Freedom's law: The moral reading of the American constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Easton, 1957 Easton, D. (1957). An approach to the analysis of political systems. World Politics: A Quarterly Journal of International Relations, 9(3), 383–400.

Elstub and Escobar, 2019 Elstub, S. , & Escobar, O. (2019). Defining and typologising democratic innovations. In S. Elstub & O. Escobar (Eds.), Handbook of democratic innovation and governance (pp. 11–31). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

el-Wakil, 2017 el-Wakil, A. (2017). The deliberative potential of facultative referendums: Procedure and substance in direct democracy. Democratic Theory, 4(1), 59–78.

Ercan and Gagnon, 2014 Ercan, S. A. , & Gagnon, J. P. (2014). The crisis of democracy: Which crisis? Which democracy? Democratic Theory, 1(2), 1–10.

Estlund and Landemore, 2018 Estlund, D. , & Landemore, H. (2018). The epistemic value of democratic deliberation. In A. Bächtiger (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of deliberative democracy (pp. 113–131). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Estlund, 2008 Estlund, D. M. (2008). Democratic authority: A philosophical framework. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Fach, 1974 Fach, W. (1974). Diskurs und Herrschaft – Überlegungen zu Habermas' Legitimationslogik/Discourse and Domination – Reflections on the Logic of Legitimization in the Work of Habermas. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 3, 221–228.

Farkas and Schou, 2019 Farkas, J. , & Schou, J. (2019). Post-truth, fake news and democracy: Mapping the politics of falsehood. New York and London: Routledge.

Farrell et al., 2011 Farrell, D. , O'Malley, E. , & Suiter, J. (2011). The 2011 We the citizens pilot citizens. Assembly. In G. M. Carney & C. Harris (Eds.), Citizens' voices: Experiments in democratic renewal and reform. Galway. Retrieved from http://www.newdemocracy.com.au/docs/researchpapers/Citizens%20Voices%20Experiments%20in%20Democratic%20Renewal%20and%20Reform.pdf#page=19

Farrelly, 1999 Farrelly, C. (1999). Does rawls support the procedural republic? A critical response to Sandel’s Democracy’s discontent. Politics, 19(1), 29–35.

Finlayson, 2019 Finlayson, J. G. (2019). The Habermas-Rawls debate. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Fleuß , 2017 Fleuß, D. (2017). Prozeduren, Rechte, Demokratie. Das legitimatorische Potential von Verfahren für politische Systeme. PhD Dissertation, Heidelberg. Retrieved from http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/23203/

Fleuß , 2019a Fleuß, D. (2019a). Zur Balance von Transparenz und Verborgenheit: das komplementäre Verhältnis von öffentlicher und nicht-öffentlicher Kommunikation in Jürgen Habermas‘ Demokratietheorie. In J. Knobloch (Ed.), Staat und Geheimnis – Der Kampf um die (Un)Sichtbarkeit der Macht (pp. 115–140). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

Fleuß, 2019b Fleuß, D. (2019b). Radikale Volkssouveränität und Rechtsmethodik: Ingeborg Maus ‘Kritik des Verhältnisses von Demokratie und Justiz. Ethik und Gesellschaft 1/2019. doi:10.18156/eug-1-2019-rez-7

Fleuß and Helbig, 2020 Fleuß, D. , & Helbig, K. (2020). Measuring nation states’ deliberativeness: Systematic challenges, methodological pitfalls, and strategies for upscaling the measurement of deliberation. Political Studies. doi:10.1177/0032321719890817

Fleuß and Schaal, 2019 Fleuß, D. , & Schaal, G. S. (2019). What are we doing when we are doing democratic theory? In Democratic Theory, 6(2), 12–26.

Fleuß et al., 2018 Fleuß, D. , Helbig, K. , & Schaal, G. S. (2018). Four parameters for measuring democratic deliberation: Theoretical and methodological challenges and how to respond. Politics and Governance, 6(1), 11–21.

Fleuß et al., 2019 Fleuß, D. , Schaal, G. S. , & Helbig, K. (2019). Empirische Messung digitalisierter Demokratien: Erkenntnistheoretische Herausforderungen und eine wissenschaftstheoretische Antwort. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 60(3), 461–486.

Fleuß, 2020 Fleuß, D. (2020). Warum Politische Theorie nicht praxisfern sein muss. In Politikum: Was leistet die Politikwissenschaft für die Gesellschaft? (Sonderheft 2020), 10–16.

Foa and Mounk, 2017 Foa, R. S., & Mounk, Y. (2017). The signs of deconsolidation. Journal of Democracy, 28(1), 5–15.

Foa and Mounk, 2019 Foa, R. S. , & Mounk, Y. (2019). Democratic deconsolidation in developed democracies, 1995-2018, 1995–2018, Harvard center for European studies open forum. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

Forst, 2010 Forst, R. (2010). The justification of human rights and the basic right to justification: A reflexive approach. Ethics, 120(4), 711–740.

Forst, 2011 Forst, R. (2011). The right to justification: Elements of a constructivist theory of justice. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Forst, 2014 Forst, R. (2014). Justification and critique: Towards a critical theory of politics. Cambridge: Polity.

Fournier et al., 2011 Fournier, P. , Van der Kolk, H. , Carty, R. K. , Blais, A. , & Rose, J. (2011). When citizens decide: Lessons from citizen assemblies on electoral reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fraser and Honneth, 2003 Fraser, N. , & Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution or recognition?: A political-philosophical exchange. London and New York: Verso.

Fried, 2020 Fried, B. H. (2020). Rawls, risk, and the maximin principle. Facing up to scarcity: The logic and limits of nonconsequentialist thought (pp. 149–154). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Galston, 2010 Galston, W. A. (2010). Realism in political theory. European Journal of Political Theory, 9(4), 385–411.

Gaus, 2013 Gaus, D. (2013). Rational reconstruction as a method of political theory between social critique and empirical political science. Constellations, 20(4), 553–570.

Geiß el et al., 2019 Geißel, B. , Dean, R. , Jung, S. , & Wipfle, B. (2019). Abschlussbericht der wissenschaftlichen Evaluation. [Scientific report Bürgerrat Demokratie], by Research Unit Democratic Innovations, Goethe University Frankfurt (Main). Retrieved from https://www.buergerrat.de/fileadmin/downloads/evaluationsbericht.pdf

Gerstenberg, 2019 Gerstenberg, O. (2019). Radical democracy and the rule of law: Reflections on J. Habermas' legal philosophy. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 17(4), 1054–1058.

Gesang, 2010 Gesang, B. (2010). Are moral philosophers moral experts? Bioethics, 24(4), 153–159.

Geuss, 1981 Geuss, R. (1981). The idea of a critical theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Giroux, 2018 Giroux, H. A. (2018). What is the role of higher education in the age of fake news?. In M. A. Peters, S. Rider, M. Hyvönen, & T. Besley (Eds.), Post-truth, fake news. Viral modernity and higher education (pp. 197–215). Singapore: Springer.

Glaser, 2013 Glaser, K. (2013). Über legitime Herrschaft: Grundlagen der Legitimitätstheorie. Wiesbaden: Springer.

Gledhill, 2011 Gledhill, J. (2011). Procedure in substance and substance in procedure: Reframing the Rawls–Habermas debate. In J. G. Finlayson & F. Freyenhagen (Eds.), Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the political. Routledge studies in contemporary philosophy (Vol. 23, pp. 181–199). London: Routledge.

Gledhill, 2017 Gledhill, J. (2017). The ideal and reality of epistemic proceduralism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 20(4), 486–507.

Gledhill, 2020 Gledhill, J. (2020). Rawls's post-Kantian constructivism. In J. Gledhill & S. Stein (Eds.), Hegel and contemporary practical philosophy: Beyond Kantian constructivism (pp. 128–152). London: Routledge.

Göhler, 1996 Göhler, G. (1996). Institutions in political theory. In D. Rometsch & W. Wessels (Eds.), The European Union and member states: Towards institutional fusion? (pp. 1–19). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Goodin, 2008 Goodin, R. E. (2008). Innovating democracy: Democratic theory and practice after the deliberative turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gould, 1996 Gould, C. (1996). Diversity and democracy: Representing differences. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political (pp. 171–186). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Greve, 2009 Greve, J. (2009). Jürgen Habermas. Wiesbaden: UTB.

Grofman and Feld, 1988 Grofman, B. , & Feld, S. L. (1988). Rousseau's general will: A condorcetian perspective. American Political Science Review, 82(2), 567–576.

Habermas, 1975 Habermas, J. (1975). Legitimation crisis (Vol. 519). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

Habermas, 1984 Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. Cambridge: Polity. [= TCA 1].

Habermas, 1990 Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [= MCCA].

Habermas, 1991 Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Habermas, 1992 Habermas, J. (1992). The unity of reason in the diversity of its voices. Postmetaphysical thinking. Philosophical essays. Cambridge: Polity.

Habermas, 1993 Habermas, J. (1993). Justification and application: Remarks on discourse ethics. Cambridge: Polity. [= JA].

Habermas, 1995a Habermas, J. (1995a). Reconciliation through the public use of reason: remarks on John Rawls's political liberalism. The Journal of Philosophy, 92(3), 109–131.

Habermas, 1995b Habermas, J. (1995b). On the internal relation between the rule of law and democracy. European Journal of Philosophy, 3(1), 12–20.

Habermas, 1996 Habermas, J. (1996). Between fact and norms. Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Oxford; Cambridge, MA: Polity Press. [=BFN].

Habermas, 2001 Habermas, J. (2001). Constitutional democracy: A paradoxical union of contradictory principles? Political Theory, 29(6), 766–781.

Habermas, 2004 Habermas, J. (2004). Religious tolerance: The pacemaker for cultural rights. Philosophy, 79(307), 5–18.

Habermas, 2008 Habermas, J. (2008). Ein avantgardistischer Spürsinn für Relevanzen. Die Rolle des Intellektuellen und die Sache Europas. Ach, Europa: Kleine politische Schriften XI. Frankfurt am main (pp. 77–87). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

Habermas, 2019 Habermas, J. (2019 I/II). Auch eine Geschichte der Philosophie: Vol. I: Die okzidentale Konstellation von Glauben und Wissen; Vol. II: Vernünftige Freiheit. Spuren des Diskurses über Glauben und Wissen. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

Hammond, 2018 Hammond, M. (2018). Deliberative democracy as a critical theory. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 22(7), 787–808.

Hampe, 2007 Hampe, M. (2007). Propheten, Richter, Ärzte, Narren: Eine Typologie von Philosophen und Intellektuellen. In M. Carrier & J. Roggenhofer (Eds.), Wandel oder Niedergang? Die Rolle der Intellektuellen in der Wissensgesellschaft (pp. 33–54). Bielefeld: Transcript.

Harcourt, 2020 Harcourt, B. E. (2020). Critique and Praxis. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Harsanyi, 1980 Harsanyi, J. C. (1980). Can the maximin principle serve as a basis for morality? A critique of John Rawls's theory. Essays on ethics, social behavior, and scientific explanation. Theory and decision library (an international series in the philosophy and methodology of the social and behavioral sciences (Vol. 12, pp. 37–63). Cambridge: Springer.

Hart, 1973 Hart, H. L. A. (1973). Rawls on liberty and its priority. University of Chicago Law Review, 40(3), 534–555.

Haus, 2018 Haus, M. (2018). Equality beyond liberal egalitarianism: Walzer's contribution to the theory of Justice. In M. Knoll , S. Snyder , & N. Şimsek (Eds.), New perspectives on distributive justice: Deep disagreements, pluralism, and the problem of consensus (pp. 71–89). Berlin: De Gruyter.

Hedrick, 2010 Hedrick, T. (2010). Coping with constitutional indeterminacy: John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 36(2), 183–208.

Hendricks and Vestergaard, 2017 Hendricks, V. F. & Vestergaard, M. (2017). Verlorene Wirklichkeit? An der Schwelle zur postfaktischen Demokratie. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 13/2017, 4–10.

Hendricks and Vestergaard, 2019 Hendricks, V. F., & Vestergaard, M. (2019). Reality lost: Markets of attention, misinformation and manipulation. Cham: Springer Nature.

Hendriks et al., 2016 Hendriks, C. M. , Duus, S. , & Ercan, S. A. (2016). Performing politics on social media: The dramaturgy of an environmental controversy on Facebook. Environmental Politics, 25(6), 1102–1125.

Hendriks et al., 2020 Hendriks, C. M. , Ercan, S. A. , & Boswell, J. (2020). Mending democracy: Democratic repair in disconnected times. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hendriks, 2007 Hendriks, C. M. (2007). Praxis stories: Experiencing interpretive policy research. Critical Policy Analysis, 1(3), 278–300.

Hershovitz, 2003 Hershovitz, S. (2003). Legitimacy, democracy, and Razian authority. Legal Theory, 9, 201–220.

Herzog and Zacka, 2019 Herzog, L. , & Zacka, B. (2019). Fieldwork in political theory: Five arguments for an ethnographic sensibility. British Journal of Political Science, 49(2), 763–784.

Hibbing and Theiss-Morse, 2002 Hibbing, J. R. , & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth democracy: Americans' beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Höffe, 2013 Höffe, O. (2013). Introduction. In Höffe (Ed.), John Rawls: A theory of justice (pp. 1–20). Leiden; Boston, MA: Brill.

Hofmann, 1980 Hofmann, H. (1980). Legalität, Legitimität. In J. Ritter & K. Gründer (Eds.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie (Vol. 5, pp. 161–166). Basel; Stuttgart: Schwabe Verlag.

Honig, 2001 Honig, B. (2001). Dead rights, live futures: A reply to Habermas's “constitutional democracy”. Political Theory, 29(6), 792–805.

Honig, 2007 Honig, B. (2007). Between decision and deliberation: Political paradox in democratic theory. American Political Science Review, 101(1), 1–17.

Honneth, 1996 Honneth, A. (1996). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Honneth, 2014 Honneth, A. (2014). Freedom's Right (translated by Ganahl, J.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Horkheimer, 1972 Horkheimer, M. (1972). Traditional and critical theory. Critical theory: Selected essays (pp. 188–243). New York, NY: Continuum Pub. Corp.

Hornblower and Spawforth, 1996 Hornblower, S. , & Spawforth, A. (Eds.). (1996). The Oxford classical dictionary (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [= OED 1996].

Huntington, 1981 Huntington, S. P. (1981). American politics: The promise of disharmony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Iser and Strecker, 2010 Iser, M. , & Strecker, D. (2010). Jürgen Habermas zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius.

Jennstå l and Niemeyer, 2017 Jennstål, J. , & Niemeyer, S. J. (2017). Creating deliberative conditions: The role of activating a deliberative state. Working Paper Series, Centre for Deliberative Democracy and Global Governance. Institute for Governance and Policy Analysis, University of Canberra.

Jennstå l, 2018 Jennstål, J. (2018). Deliberative participation and personality: The effect of traits, situations, and motivation. European Political Science Review, 10(3), 417–440.

Jones, 2020 Jones, G. (2020). 10 percent less democracy. Why should you trust Elites a little more and the Masses a little less. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Jubb, 2017 Jubb, R. (2017). Realism. In A. Blau (Ed.), Methods in analytical political theory (pp. 112–130). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, [1785] 1993 Kant, I. ([1785] 1993). Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals (translated Ellington, J. W.) (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Hackett.

Kant, [1795] 1983 Kant, I. ([1795] 1983). Perpetual peace and other essays (translated by Humphrey, T.). Cambridge, MA: Hackett Publishing.

Kant, [1797] 1996 Kant, I. ([1797] 1996). The metaphysics of morals (translated by Gregor, M.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Karpowitz and Mendelberg, 2011 Karpowitz, C. F. , & Mendelberg, T. (2011). An experimental approach to citizen deliberation. In J. N. Druckman , D. P. Green , J. H. Kuklinski , & A. Lupia (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of experimental political science (pp. 258–272). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kelsen, 1949 Kelsen, H. (1949). The natural-law doctrine before the tribunal of science. The Western Political Quarterly, 2(4), 481–513.

Kersting, 1994 Kersting, W. (1994). Die politische Philosophie des Gesellschaftsvertrags. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

Kersting, 2001 Kersting, W. (2001). John Rawls zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius.

Keyes, 2004 Keyes, R. (2004). The post-truth era: Dishonesty and deception in contemporary life. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.

Kim, 2004 Kim, T. (2004). Gerechtigkeit und Verfassung: Eine Rawlssche Deutung der Bundesverfassungsgerichtlichen Formel ‚eine am Gerechtigkeitsgedanken orientierte Betrachtungsweise‘. Nomos.

Klein, 2017 Klein, N. (2017). No is not enough: Defeating the new shock politics. London: Penguin.

Korsgaard, 2003 Korsgaard, C. M. (2003). Realism and constructivism in twentieth-century moral philosophy. Journal of Philosophical Research, 28(Supplement), 99–122.

Laden, 2014 Laden, A. S. (2014). Constructivism as rhetoric. In J. Mandle & D. Reidy (Eds.), A companion to Rawls (pp. 59–72). Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell.

Lafont, 2003 Lafont, C. (2003). Procedural justice? Implications of the Rawls-Habermas debate for discourse ethics. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 29(2), 163–181.

Lafont, 2020 Lafont, C. (2020). Democracy without shortcuts: A participatory conception of deliberative democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Landemore, 2015 Landemore, H. (2015). Inclusive constitution-making: The Icelandic experiment. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 23(2), 166–191.

Landemore, 2017a Landemore, H. (2017a). Beyond the fact of disagreement? The epistemic turn in deliberative democracy. Social Epistemology, 31(3), 277–295.

Landemore, 2017b Landemore, H. (2017b). Democratic reason: Politics, collective intelligence, and the rule of the many. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Landemore, 2017c Landemore, H. (2017c). Deliberative democracy as open, not (just) representative democracy. Daedalus, 146(3), 51–63.

Landemore, 2020 Landemore, H. (2020). Open democracy: Reinventing popular rule for the twenty-first century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Landwehr, 2014 Landwehr, C. (2014). Facilitating deliberation: The role of impartial intermediaries in deliberative mini-publics. In M. Setälä (Ed.), Deliberative mini-publics: Involving citizens in the democratic process (pp. 77–92). Colchester: ECPR Press.

Larmore, 1999 Larmore, C. (1999). The moral basis of political liberalism. The Journal of Philosophy, 96(12), 599–625.

Laslett, 1956 Laslett, P. (1956). Introduction. In P. Laslett (Ed.), Philosophy, politics and society: First series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lassman, 2003 Lassman, P. (2003). Political theory as utopia. History of the Human Sciences, 16(1), 49–62.

Levitsky and Ziblatt, 2018 Levitsky, S. , & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How democracies die. New York, NY: Broadway Books.

Leydet, 1997 Leydet, D. (1997). Habermas's decentered view of society and the problem of democratic legitimacy. Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy/Revue Canadienne de Philosophie Continentale, 1(1), 35–48.

List and Goodin, 2001 List, C. , & Goodin, R. E. (2001). Epistemic democracy: Generalizing the Condorcet jury theorem. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 9(3), 277–306.

Longino, 2002 Longino, H. (2002). The fate of knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Lowndes and Paxton, 2018 Lowndes, V. , & Paxton, M. (2018). Can agonism be institutionalised? Can institutions be agonised? Prospects for democratic design. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 20(3), 693–710.

Lowndes and Roberts, 2013 Lowndes, V. , & Roberts, M. (2013). Why institutions matter: The new institutionalism in political science. Basingstoke: Macmillan International Higher Education.

Luhmann, 1995 Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

MacLean, 2017 MacLean, N. (2017). Democracy in chains: The deep history of the radical right's stealth plan for America. New York, NY: Penguin.

Mandle, 2014 Mandle, J. (2014). The choice from the original position. In J. Mandle & D. Reidy (Eds.), A companion to Rawls (pp. 128–143). Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell.

Mansbridge et al., 2012 Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Christiano, T., Fung, A., Parkinson, J., … Warren, M. E. (Eds.). (2012). A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. Deliberative systems: Deliberative democracy at the large scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

March and Olsen, 1989 March, J. G. , & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York, NY: The Free Press.

Martí , 2006 Martí, J. L. (2006). The epistemic conception of deliberative democracy defended. Reasons, rightness, and equal political autonomy. In J. L. Martí & S. Besson (Eds.), Deliberative democracy and its discontents (pp. 27–56). New York, NY: Ashgate.

Maus, 1992 Maus, I . (1992). Zur Aufklärung der Demokratietheorie: Rechts-und demokratietheoretische Überlegungen im Anschluß an Kant. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Maus, 1998 Maus, I. (1998). Der Urzustand. In O. Höffe (Ed.) John Rawls: Eine Theorie der Gerechtigkeit (Klassiker Auslegen, Bd. Vol. 15). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 65–88.

Maus, 2011 Maus, I. (2011). Über Volkssouveränität: Elemente einer Demokratietheorie. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

Maus, 2015 Maus, I . (2015). Menschenrechte, Demokratie und Frieden: Perspektiven globaler Organisation. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Maus, 2018 Maus, I. (2018). Justiz als gesellschaftliches Über-Ich. Zur Position der Rechtsprechung in der Demokratie. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

McCarthy, 1993 McCarthy, T. (1993). Deconstruction and reconstruction in contemporary critical theory. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 23(sup. 1), 247–264.

McCarthy, 1994 McCarthy, T. (1994). Kantian constructivism and reconstructivism: Rawls and Habermas in dialogue. Ethics, 105(1), 44–63.

Mendonç a et al., 2020 Mendonça, R. F. , Ercan, S. A. , & Asenbaum, H. (2020). More than words: A multidimensional approach to deliberative democracy. Political Studies. doi:10.1177/0032321720950561

Meisenbach, 2006 Meisenbach, R. J. (2006). Habermas's discourse ethics and principle of universalization as a moral framework for organizational communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 20(1), 39–62.

Merkel and Kneip, 2018 Merkel, W. , & Kneip, S. (Eds.). (2018). Democracy and crisis. Challenges in turbulent times. Cham: Springer VS.

Merkel, 2014 Merkel, W. (2014). Is there a crisis of democracy? Democratic Theory, 1(2), 11–25.

Mill, [1861] 1960 Mill, J. S. ([1861] 1960). On liberty, representative government, the subjection of women; Three essays. New York, NY: Penguin.

Moore, 1982 Moore, M. (1982). Moral reality. Wisconsin Law Review, 6, 1061–1156.

Moore, 2017 Moore, A. (2017). Critical elitism: Deliberation, democracy, and the problem of expertise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Morrell, 2010 Morrell, M. E. (2010). Empathy and democracy: Feeling, thinking, and deliberation. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State Press.

Muradova, 2020 Muradova, L. (2020). Seeing the other side? Perspective-taking and reflective political judgements in interpersonal deliberation. Political Studies. doi:10.1177/0032321720916605

Mutz, 2006 Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nagel, 1989 Nagel, T. (1989). The view from nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Neal, 1987 Neal, P. (1987). In the shadow of the general will: Rawls, Kant and Rousseau on the problem of political right. Review of Politics, 49(3), 389–409.

Nelson, 1980 Nelson, W. (1980). The very idea of pure procedural justice. Ethics, 90(4), 502–511.

Niemeyer and Dryzek, 2007 Niemeyer, S. , & Dryzek, J. S. (2007). The ends of deliberation: meta-consensus and inter-subjective rationality as ideal outcomes. Swiss Political Science Review, 13(4), 497–526.

Niemeyer, 2011 Niemeyer, S. (2011). The emancipatory effect of deliberation: Empirical lessons from mini-publics. Politics & Society, 39(1), 103–140.

Niemeyer, 2019 Niemeyer, S. (2019). Intersubjective reasoning in political deliberation. Working Paper Series, Centre for Deliberative Democracy and Global Governance. Retrieved from https://www.governanceinstitute.edu.au/magma/media/upload/ckeditor/files/Intersubjective%20Reasoning(4).pdf

Niemeyer and Jennstål, 2018 Niemeyer, S., & Jennstål, J. (2018). Scaling up deliberative effects: Applying lessons of mini-publics. In A. Bächtiger, J. Dryzek, J. Mansbridge, & M. Warren (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of deliberative democracy (pp. 329–347). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Niesen, 2007 Niesen, P. (2007). Politische theorie als Demokratiewissenschaft. In H. Buchstein & G. Göhler (Eds.), Politische Theorie und Politikwissenschaft (pp. 126–155). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

Nonhoff, 2019 Nonhoff, M. (2019). Jürgen Habermas. In D. Comtesse , O. Flügel-Martinsen , F. Martinsen , & M. Nonhoff (Eds.), Radikale demokratietheorie. Ein Handbuch (pp. 294–303). Berlin: Suhrkamp.

Norris and Inglehart, 2019 Norris, P. , & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Norris, 1999 Norris, P. (1999). Introduction: The growth of critical citizens? In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government (pp. 1–27). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Norris, 2011 Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nussbaum, 2007 Nussbaum, M. C. (2007). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

O’ Neill, 1989 O'Neill, O. (1989). Constructions of reason: Explorations of Kant's practical philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

O’ Neill, 2015 O'Neill, O. (2015). Constructing authorities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Offe, 1994 Offe, C. (1994).Designing institutions for East European transitions. In R. E. Goodin (Ed.), The theory of institutional design (pp. 199–226). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Offe, 2011 Offe, C. (2011). Crisis and Innovation of liberal democracy: Can deliberation be institutionalised? Czech Sociological Review, 47(3), 447–472.

O'Neill and Williamson, 2012 O'Neill, M. , & Williamson, T. (Eds.). (2012). Property-owning democracy: Rawls and beyond. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Palumbo, 2012 Palumbo, A. (2012). Epistemic turn or democratic U-turn? On the tension between philosophical reasoning and political action. In Deliberative democracy 1. Teoria politica, NS Annalin (May), 269–291. Retrieved from http://www. academia.edu/1371787/Epistemic_Turn

Paré s et al., 2017 Parés, M. , Parés, M. , Boada, J. , Canal, R. , Hernando, E. , & Martínez, R. (2017). Challenging collaborative urban governance under austerity: How local governments and social organizations deal with housing policy in Catalonia. Journal of Urban Affairs, 39(8), 1066–1084.

Parkinson, 2020 Parkinson, J. (2020). The Roles of referendums in deliberative systems. Representation, 1–16. doi:10.1080/00344893.2020.1718195

Parsons, 1991 Parsons, T. (1991). The social system. London: Psychology Press.

Pecar, 2008 Pecar, A. (2008). Herstellung und Darstellung verbindlicher Entscheidungen. Legitimation durch Verfahren in vormodernen und modernen Gesellschaften. H-Soz- Kult. Kommunikation und Fachinformation für die Geschichtswissenschaften. Retrieved from http://www.hsozkult.de/conferencereport/id/tagungsberichte- 2033

Pedahzur and Weinberg, 2001 Pedahzur, A. , & Weinberg, L. (2001). Modern European democracy and its enemies: The threat of the extreme right. Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions, 2(1), 52–72.

Pedersen, 2008 Pedersen, J. (2008). Habermas' method: Rational reconstruction. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 38(4), 457–485.

Peter, 2007a Peter, F. (2007a). Rawls' idea of public reason and democratic legitimacy. Politics and Ethics Review, 3(1), 129–143.

Peter, 2007b Peter, F. (2007b). Democratic legitimacy and proceduralist social epistemology. Politics, Philosophy and Economicx, 6(3), 329–353.

Peter, 2008 Peter, F. (2008). Pure epistemic proceduralism. Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology, 5(1), 33–55.

Peter, 2009 Peter, F. (2009). Democratic legitimacy. London: Routledge.

Peter, 2010 Peter, F. (2010). Political legitimacy. In E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/legitimacy/

Peter, 2019 Peter, F. (2019). Political legitimacy under epistemic constraints: Why public reasons matter. In M. Schwartzberg (Ed.), Political legitimacy (pp. 147–173). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

Pettit, 2019 Pettit, P. (2019). The control theory of legitimacy. In W. Sadurski , M. Sevel , & K. Walton (Eds.), Legitimacy: The state and beyond (pp. 7–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Phillips, 1994 Phillips, A. (1994). Dealing with difference: A politics of ideas or a politics of presence? Constellations, 1(1), 88–91.

Polletta, 2016 Polletta, F. (2016). Social movements in an age of participation. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 21(4), 485–497.

Popper, 1962 Popper, K. (1962). The open society and its enemies. London: Routledge and Kegan.

Price, 1960 Price, R. (1960). Holistic and piecemeal social engineering. Political Science, 12(2), 151–157.

Rasmussen, 1992 Rasmussen, D. B. (1992). Political legitimacy and discourse ethics. International Philosophical Quarterly, 32(1), 17–34.

Rawls, [1995] 2005 Rawls, J. ([1995] 2005). Political liberalism: Reply to Habermas. Political liberalism (pp. 372–434). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. [=RH].

Rawls, 1980 Rawls, J. (1980). Kantian constructivism in moral theory. The Journal of Philosophy, 77(9), 515–572. [=KC].

Rawls, 1997 Rawls, J. (1997). The idea of public reason revisited. University of Chicago Law Review, 64(3), 765–807. [= IPR].

Rawls, 1999 Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice, revised edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [=ToJ].

Rawls, 2001 Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [=JaF].

Rawls, 2005 Rawls, J. (2005). Political liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. [= PL].

Raz, 1986 Raz, J. (1986). The morality of freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Raz, 1990 Raz, J. (1990). Facing diversity: The case for epistemic abstinence. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 19(1), 3–46.

Raz, 1994 Raz, J. (1994). Ethics in the public domain: Essays in the morality of law and politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Raz, 2006 Raz, J. (2006). The problem of authority: Revisiting the service conception. Minnesota Law Review, 90, 1003–1044.

Reidy, 2007 Reidy, D. A. (2007). Reciprocity and reasonable disagreement: From liberal to democratic legitimacy. Philosophical Studies, 132(2), 243–291.

Rhodes et al., 2006 Rhodes, R. A. W. , Binder, S. A. , & Rockman, B. A. (2006). Preface. The Oxford handbook of political institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ricœur, 2000 Ricœur, P. (2000). Is a purely procedural theory of justice possible? (translated by Pellamer, D.) The just (pp. 36–57). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Riley, 1970 Riley, P. (1970). A possible explanation of Rousseau's general will. American Political Science Review, 64(1), 86–97.

Rorty, 1989 Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rose, 2017 Rose, J. (2017). Brexit, Trump, and post-truth politics. Public Integrity, 19(6), 555–558.

Rosenfeld, 1995 Rosenfeld, M. (1995). Can rights, democracy, and justice be reconciled through discourse theory? Reflections on Habermas's proceduralist paradigm of law. Cardozo Law Review, 17, 791–824.

Rostboll, 2008 Rostboll, C. F. (2008). Deliberative freedom: Deliberative democracy as critical theory. New York, NY: SUNY Press.

Rostboll, 2015 Rostboll, C. F. (2015). The non‐instrumental value of democracy: The freedom argument. Constellations, 22(2), 267–278.

Rousseau, [1762] 2011 Rousseau, J.-J. ([1762] 2011).The social contract. In N. Capaldi & G. Lloyd (Eds.), The two narratives of political economy (pp. 87–49). Salem, MA: Scrivener Pub.

Rummens, 2006 Rummens, S. (2006). Debate: The co-originality of private and public autonomy in deliberative democracy. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(4), 469–481.

Ryle, 1945 Ryle, G. (1945). Knowing how and knowing that: The presidential address. Proceedings of the Aristotelian society. Aristotelian society (Vol. 46, pp. 1–16). Oxford: Wiley.

Saffon and Urbinati, 2013 Saffon, M. P. , & Urbinati, N. (2013). Procedural democracy, the bulwark of equal liberty. Political Theory, 41(3), 441–481.

Salzborn, 2020 Salzborn, S. (2020). The modern state and its enemies: Democracy, nationalism and antisemitism. London: Anthem Press.

Saward, 2001 Saward, M. (2001). Reconstructing democracy: Current thinking and new directions. Government and Opposition, 36(1), 559–581.

Saward, 2003 Saward, M. (2003). Enacting democracy. Political Studies, 51(1), 161–179.

Saward, 2017 Saward, M. (2017). Agency, design and ‘slow democracy’. Time & Society, 26(3), 362–383.

Schä uble, 2019 Schäuble, W. (2019). Rede des Bundestagspräsidenten Dr. Wolfgang Schäuble anlässlich der Überreichung des Bürgergutachtens durch den Bürgerrat Demokratie – transkription [transcript of the speech by the President of the Bundestag Dr. Wolfgang Schäuble on the occasion of the presentation of the citizens report by the Citizens' Council on Democracy]. Retrieved from https://www.mehr-demokratie.de/fileadmin/pdf/2019-12-11_Rede_Scha__uble_V1.pdf

Schaal et al., 2017 Schaal, G. S. , ß, D. , & Dumm, S. (2017). Die Wahrheit über Postfaktizität. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 31–38. 44-45/2017.

Schaal et al., 2019 Schaal, G. S. , Dumm, S. , & Fleuß, D. (2019). Die vielen Wahrheiten algorithmenbasierter Interpretation: “Die Wahrheit über Postfaktizität!” dekonstruiert. Zeitschrift für Politik, 29(2), 263–285.

Schliesky, 2004 Schliesky, U. (2004). Souveränität und Legitimität von Herrschaftsgewalt: Die Weiterentwicklung von Begriffen der Staatslehre und des Staatsrechts im europäischen Mehrebenensystem (Vol. 112). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

Schmelzle, 2012 Schmelzle, C. (2012). Zum Begriff politischer Legitimität. In Der Aufstieg der Legitimitätspolitik. Rechtfertigung und Kritik politisch-ökonomischer Ordnungen. Leviathan. Berliner Zeitschrift Für Sozialwissenschaft. Sonderband, 27, 417–436.

Schmidtz, 2011 Schmidtz, D. (2011). Nonideal theory: What it is and what it needs to be. Ethics, 121(4), 772–796.

Schmidtz, 2017 Schmidtz, D. (2017). Realistic idealism. In A. Blau (Ed.), Methods in analytical political theory (pp. 131–152). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schwartzberg, 2008 Schwartzberg, M. (2008). Voting the general will: Rousseau on decision rules. Political Theory, 36(3), 403–423.

Searle and Searle, 1969 Searle, J. R., & Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language (Vol. 626). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shklar, 1965 Shklar, J. (1965). The political theory of utopia: From melancholy to nostalgia. Dædalus, 367–381.

Slobodian, 2020 Slobodian, Q. (2020). Globalists: The end of empire and the birth of neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Smith and Wales, 2000 Smith, G. , & Wales, C. (2000). Citizens' juries and deliberative democracy. Political Studies, 48(1), 51–65.

Smith, 2004 Smith, W. (2004). Democracy, deliberation and disobedience. Res Publica, 10(4), 353–377.

Smith, 2008 Smith, W. (2008). Civil disobedience and social power: Reflections on Habermas. Contemporary Political Theory, 7(1), 72–89.

Smith, 2009 Smith, G. (2009). Democratic innovations: Designing institutions for citizen participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Smith, 2018 Smith, W. (2018). Disruptive democracy: The ethics of direct action. Raisons Politiques, 69(1/2018), 13–27.

Smith, 2019 Smith, W. (2019). Deliberative citizenship: A critical reappraisal. Citizenship Studies, 23(8), 815–830.

Song, 2012 Song, E. (2012). Rawls's liberal principle of legitimacy. The Philosophical Forum, 43(2), 153–173.

Speed and Mannion, 2017 Speed, E. , & Mannion, R. (2017). The rise of post-truth populism in pluralist liberal democracies: Challenges for health policy. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 6(5), 249–251.

Stemplowska and Swift, 2012 Stemplowska, Z. , & Swift, A. (2012). Ideal and nonideal theory. In D. Estlund (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of political philosophy (pp. 373–389). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stillman, 1974 Stillman, P. G. (1974). The concept of legitimacy. Polity, 7(1), 32–56.

Suiter, 2016 Suiter, J. (2016). Post-truth politics. Political Insight, 7(3), 25–27.

Sunstein, 2018 Sunstein, C. R. (2018). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Taylor, 1994 Taylor, C. (1994). Multiculturalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Tschentscher, 1999 Tschentscher, A. (1999). Prozedurale Theorien der Gerechtigkeit: Rationales Entscheiden, Diskursethik und Prozedurales Recht. Studien zur Rechtsphilosophie und Rechtstheorie. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

Urbinati, 2014 Urbinati, N. (2014). Democracy disfigured. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Vincent, 2004 Vincent, A. (2004). The nature of political theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Vinx, 2015 Vinx, L. (2015). Carl Schmitt and the problem of constitutional guardianship. In M. Arvidsson , L. Brännström , & P. Minkkinen (Eds.), The contemporary relevance of carl Schmitt: Law, politics, theology (pp. 34–49). London: Routledge.

Vogelmann, 2018 Vogelmann, F. (2018). The problem of post-truth. Rethinking the relationship between truth and politics. Behemoth. A Journal on Civilisation, 11(2), 18–37.

Waldron, 1999 Waldron, J. (1999). Law and disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Waldron, 2017 Waldron, J. (2017). A right-based critique of constitutional rights. Bills of Rights, 13(1), 18–51.

Wall, 2007 Wall, S. (2007). Democracy and equality. The Philosophical Quarterly, 57(228), 416–438.

Walzer, 1990 Walzer, M. (1990). The communitarian critique of liberalism. Political Theory, 18(1), 6–23.

Walzer, 2003 Walzer, M. (2003). Philosophy and democracy. In T. Christiano (Ed.), Philosophy and democracy. An anthology (pp. 258–284). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Warren, 2009 Warren, M. E. (2009). Governance-driven democratization. Critical Policy Studies, 3(1), 3–13.

Warren, 2017 Warren, M. E. (2017). A problem-based approach to democratic theory. American Political Science Review, 111(1), 39–53.

Warren and Pearse, 2008 Warren, M. E., & Pearse, H. (2008). Designing deliberative democracy: The British Columbia citizens' assembly. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Watkins and Fitzpatrick, 2002 Watkins, E. , & Fitzpatrick, W. (2002). O'Neill and Korsgaard on the construction of normativity. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 36(2–3), 349–367.

We the Citizens, 2011 We the Citizens . (2011). Final report . Retrieved from http://www.wethecitizens.ie/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/We-the-Citizens-2011-FINAL.pdf

Weber, 1978 Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (Vol. 1). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Weiss, 1973 Weiss, D. D. (1973). Wollheim's paradox: Survey and solution. Political Theory, 1(2), 154–170.

Weithman, 2013 Weithman, P. J. (2013). Why political liberalism? On John Rawls's political turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wenar, 2013 Wenar, L. (2013). John Rawls. In E. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/rawls/. Accessed on September 30, 15.

White and Farr, 2012 White, S. K. , & Farr, E. R. (2012). “No-saying” in Habermas. Political Theory, 40(1), 32–57.

Wiggins and Crowston, 2011 Wiggins, A. , & Crowston, K. (2011). From conservation to crowdsourcing: A typology of citizen science. 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–10). doi:10.1109/HICSS.2011.207

Williams, 1996 Williams, M. (1996). Unnatural doubts: Epistemological realism and the basis of scepticism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Williams, 2005 Williams, B. (2005). Realism and moralism in political theory. In G. Hawthorn (Ed.), In the beginning was the deed: Realism and moralism in political argument. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Williams, 2007 Williams, M. (2007). Why (Wittgensteinian) contextualism is not relativism. Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology, 4(1), 93–114.

Williamson, 2009 Williamson, T. (2009). Who owns what? An egalitarian interpretation of John Rawls's idea of a property-owning democracy. Journal of Social Philosophy, 40(3), 434–453.

Williamson and O’Neill, 2009 Williamson, T., & O’Neill, M. (2009). Property-owning democracy and the demands of justice. Living Reviews in Democracy, 1, 1.

Willke and Fetterolf, 2018 Willke, R. , & Fetterolf, J. (2018). Liberal democracy's crisis of confidence. Journal of Democracy, 29(4), 136–150.

Willke, 2014 Willke, H. (2014). Demokratie in Zeiten der Konfusion. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

Willke, 2016a Willke, H. (2016a). Dezentrierte Demokratie: Prolegomena zur Revision politischer Steuerung. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

Willke, 2016b Willke, H. (2016b). Legitimization by exuberance? Output-legitimacy and systemic risk. In A. Mascareno & K. Araujo (Eds.), Legitimization in world society (pp. 83–98). Berlin: Ashgate.

Wingenbach, 2011 Wingenbach, E. C. (2011). Institutionalizing agonistic democracy: Post-foundationalism and political liberalism. Farnham: Ashgate.

Wittgenstein, 1953 Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations (translated by Anscombe, G.E.M.). Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell.

Wöhst, 2011 Wöhst, C. (2011). Das Konzept der Neutralität im Politischen Liberalismus. (Master thesis/Magisterarbeit). Retrieved from http://epub.ub.unimuenchen.de/12200/1/MAA_Woehst.pdf

Wollheim, 1962 Wollheim, R. (1962). A Paradox in the theory of democracy. In P. Laslett , & W. G. Runciman (Eds.), Philosophy, politics and society (pp. 71–87). London: Basil Blackwell.

Yanow and Schwartz-Shea, 2006 Yanow, D. , & Schwartz-Shea, P. (2006). Introduction. Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn. London: Routledge.

Yanow, 2006 Yanow, D. (2006). Thinking interpretively: Philosophical presuppositions and the human sciences. Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn (pp. 5–26). Abingdon: Routledge.

Young, 1996 Young, I. M. (1996). Communication and the other: Beyond deliberative democracy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference (pp. 120–135). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Young, 2002 Young, I. M. (2002). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Zinman et al., 2004 Zinman, R. M. , Weinberger, J. , & Melzer, A. M. (Eds.). (2004). The public intellectual: Between philosophy and politics. Washington, DC: Rowman & Littlefield.

Zolo, 1992 Zolo, D. (1992). Democracy and complexity: A realist approach. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.