To read this content please select one of the options below:

Electroconvulsive therapy audit

Peter Bentham (Consultant in Old Age Psychiatry, The Queen Elizabeth Psychiatric Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2QZ)
Liam Callinan (Senior Registrar in Psychiatry, The Royal South Hants Hospital, Southampton S09 4PE)
Sylvia Rodriguez‐Fererra (Registrar in Psychiatry, St. Clement's Hospital, Ipswich IP3 8LS)
Martin Stevens (Consultant in Old Age Psychiatry, The Ipswich Hospital IP4 5PD, UK)

Journal of Clinical Effectiveness

ISSN: 1361-5874

Article publication date: 1 February 1998

40

Abstract

An audit of ECT practice against Royal College of Psychiatrists guidelines was conducted within a health authority with a known high rate of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) administration. The audit was conducted in two phases and included a retrospective case note review, plus concurrent observation of ECT practice. An education and training programme designed to correct practice deficiencies was implemented between the phases. ECT practice was generally of good standard. The training programme led to some changes in clinical practice. In particular there was a significant reduction in sub‐optimal ventilation and a significant reduction in unsatisfactory seizures. Introduction of a formal privileging system is a potential strategy for improving practice further.

Citation

Bentham, P., Callinan, L., Rodriguez‐Fererra, S. and Stevens, M. (1998), "Electroconvulsive therapy audit", Journal of Clinical Effectiveness, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 72-74. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb020878

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1998, MCB UP Limited

Related articles