To read this content please select one of the options below:

Village fund management and reporting systems: are they accountable?

Paulina Permatasari (Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics, Parahyangan Catholic University, Bandung, Indonesia)
Adi Budiarso (Department of Fiscal Policy Agency, Ministry of Finance, Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia)
Teguh Dartanto (Department of Economics, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia)
Agunan Paulus Samosir (Fiscal Policy Agency, Ministry of Finance, Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia)
Bramantya Saputro (Fiscal Policy Agency, Ministry of Finance, Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia)
Dewa Ekayana (Fiscal Policy Agency, Ministry of Finance, Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia)
Efid Dwi Agustono (Department of Directorate General Treasury, Ministry of Finance, Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia)
Tri Emil Alim (Department of Directorate General Treasury, Ministry of Finance, Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia)
Leni Hartono (Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics, Parahyangan Catholic University, Bandung, Indonesia)
Firli Wulansari Wahyuputri (Institute of Economic and Social Research, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia)
Irwanda Wisnu Wardhana (Research Center for Cooperative, Corporation, and People’s Economy, National Research and Innovation Agency Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia)

Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy

ISSN: 1750-6166

Article publication date: 1 July 2024

12

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to address fundamental questions surrounding accountability within village fund management (VFM) and reporting systems in Indonesia by comparing the number of anomalous data entries with the actual village funds using the VFM data for all Indonesian villages during the period 2018–2020.

Design/methodology/approach

The research presents a pioneering methodology for assessing village fund accountability by analyzing data from all Indonesian villages and using investigative journalism and qualitative analysis. It integrates data from various sources, including government regulations, previous investigations, literature, interviews, etc.

Findings

This research highlights global challenges in development and governance, revealing common issues such as poor management of village funds and the need for strengthened institutional protection enforcement. Referring to the institutional theory, the authors demonstrate how institutional structures influence community behaviors, emphasizing the importance of regulatory frameworks to prevent misuse of public resources and maintain transparency and accountability across various socio-economic and political contexts.

Practical implications

This study emphasizes the necessity for more transparent and accountable fund management practices and calls for broader consideration of implications beyond government impact.

Social implications

This research provides insights for international stakeholders to strengthen their public financial systems, through rigorous monitoring and comprehensive reporting systems.

Originality/value

This study provides the most comprehensive sample comprising all villages in Indonesia that receive village funds and measures the use of village funds based on all village-level disbursements, representing unprecedented research using this form of data.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their appreciation to Yulius Herdadi Setjo and Pauline Yuliani for their invaluable contributions in this research.

Citation

Permatasari, P., Budiarso, A., Dartanto, T., Samosir, A.P., Saputro, B., Ekayana, D., Agustono, E.D., Alim, T.E., Hartono, L., Wahyuputri, F.W. and Wardhana, I.W. (2024), "Village fund management and reporting systems: are they accountable?", Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-07-2023-0098

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2024, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles