To read this content please select one of the options below:

Navigating troubled waters: bringing the e-democratic ship into safe harbour?

Andreas Møller Jørgensen (Department of Social Sciences, Ilisimatusarfik – University of Greenland, Nuuk, Greenland)
Kim Normann Andersen (Department of IT Management, Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark)

Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy

ISSN: 1750-6166

Article publication date: 17 October 2016

195

Abstract

Purpose

Whereas prior research has conceptualized and empirically investigated reinforcement and amplification mechanisms, this paper aims to propose a framework of power that captures the dynamic ways in which different forms of online political action are structured by disparate mechanisms.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper derives a theoretical model of power from Foucault and affiliated governmentality studies, which constructs power as the mechanisms and logics that structure the field of possible actions. This model is grounded in research literature on e-democracy and applied in a study of the mechanisms that structure e-democracy.

Findings

The paper identifies four mechanisms that balance disparate concerns of e-democracy. Monitoring (M) mechanisms apply logics of security and service to weigh anonymity and publicity against each other. The range of participants is determined by Inclusion/exclusion (I) mechanisms which operate through rules of engagement. Moderation (M) mechanisms balance concerns for heterogenic viewpoints and homogeneity according to a logic of uniformity. Logics of profit-making and shared understanding warrant the balance that Exposure (E) mechanisms strike between information abundance and centralized access. The four mechanisms are combined in the MIME framework.

Research limitations/implications

The MIME framework includes mechanisms that are documented by the English-speaking research community, often with a substantial time lag. Others and potentially forceful mechanisms might not be reported in the research literature.

Practical implications

Practitioners are encouraged to be cognizant of the variety of mechanisms that condition e-democracy; their internal components and external relations of e-democratic practices when designing, building and conducting e-democratic initiatives.

Originality/value

Instead of focusing exclusively on the beneficiaries and the possible payoffs from e-democratic practices, the MIME framework developed in the paper focuses on the mechanisms which structure e-democracy.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by a three-year grant from the Danish State’s Fund for Research in the Arctic.

Citation

Jørgensen, A.M. and Andersen, K.N. (2016), "Navigating troubled waters: bringing the e-democratic ship into safe harbour?", Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 591-604. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-01-2016-0005

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles