To read this content please select one of the options below:

The German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act: impacts on sustainable supply chain management from a stakeholder perspective

Livia Buttke (Department of Sustainability-oriented Innovation and Transformation Management, Nuremberg Tech University of Applied Sciences, Nuremberg Campus of Technology, Nuremberg, Germany)
Sebastian Schötteler (Faculty of Computer Science, Nuremberg Tech University of Applied Sciences, Nuremberg, Germany and School of Business and Economics Schöller Endowed Professorship for Information Systems (Digitalization in Business and Society), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany)
Stefan Seuring (Chair of Supply Chain Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany)
Frank Ebinger (Department of Sustainability-oriented Innovation and Transformation Management, Nuremberg Tech University of Applied Sciences, Nuremberg Campus of Technology, Nuremberg, Germany)

Supply Chain Management

ISSN: 1359-8546

Article publication date: 25 July 2024

29

Abstract

Purpose

The German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (GSCDDA), as a comprehensive regulation for due diligence in supply chains, will exert profound pressure on companies’ sustainable supply chain management (SSCM). This study aims to examine the affected stakeholders’ polarizing expectations stemming from the GSCDDA, the resulting impacts on SSCM and how these findings compare with theoretical SSCM developments.

Design/methodology/approach

From 5,490 GSCDDA posts on X (formerly “Twitter”), the authors extracted 556 qualitative posts illustrating the GSCDDA discourse and analyzed them from a stakeholder perspective. The posts were classified according to the dimensions of stakeholder groups and expectations (i.e. challenges and opportunities). The authors then synthesized the posts across these dimensions and compared the identified expectations with the SSCM literature.

Findings

Seven stakeholder groups were identified, along with nine challenges (e.g. legal flaws) and four opportunities (e.g. increased transparency). The synthesis of both components revealed highly discussed and conflicting expectations. The theoretical SSCM developments partly differ from the discourse, indicating discernible gaps between theory and practice

Practical implications

Identifying key stakeholder groups supports building synergies between GSCDDA implementers and stakeholders to tackle their challenges and reinforce opportunities.

Originality/value

Due to the growing prevalence of supply chain due diligence regulations, it is essential to consider the legal implications for SSCM. This study explores the link between due diligence concepts and SSCM, and to the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to analyze how legal pressure shapes stakeholders’ expectations on companies’ SSCM.

Keywords

Citation

Buttke, L., Schötteler, S., Seuring, S. and Ebinger, F. (2024), "The German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act: impacts on sustainable supply chain management from a stakeholder perspective", Supply Chain Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-01-2024-0058

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2024, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles