To read this content please select one of the options below:

The heterogeneity of institutional investor activists and their counterintuitive tactical interactions

Jason Cavich (Department of Management, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA)

Society and Business Review

ISSN: 1746-5680

Article publication date: 15 June 2022

Issue publication date: 10 January 2024

123

Abstract

Purpose

Following the traditions of stakeholder salience theory, this paper aims to contend that some institutional investor activists and tactics have more power, legitimacy and urgency than others.

Design/methodology/approach

The author undertakes an empirical test of a saliency table looking at the effects of institutional investor heterogeneity on portfolio firm responses using ordinal logistic regression.

Findings

This study found heterogeneity for institutional investor type to drive firm responses but not tactic type raising the importance of the attributes of each type of investor activist. The author found a rank ordering of public pension plans, hedge funds and then private multiemployer funds in saliency to portfolio firms. In addition, the use of proxy-based tactics did not help or hurt each investor type. Both findings challenge prior empirical work.

Originality/value

The rank ordering based upon the heterogeneity of institutional investor activists and their tactical interactions are tested providing empirical evidence of the most influential activist investors and tactics in one study, which is rare in the literature.

Keywords

Citation

Cavich, J. (2024), "The heterogeneity of institutional investor activists and their counterintuitive tactical interactions", Society and Business Review, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 47-71. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-02-2022-0035

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles