Unusual Estimates of Probability Weighting Functions

Abstract

The author presents new estimates of the probability weighting functions found in rank-dependent theories of choice under risk. These estimates are unusual in two senses. First, they are free of functional form assumptions about both utility and weighting functions, and they are entirely based on binary discrete choices and not on matching or valuation tasks, though they depend on assumptions concerning the nature of probabilistic choice under risk. Second, estimated weighting functions contradict widely held priors of an inverse-s shape with fixed point well in the interior of the (0,1) interval: Instead the author usually finds populations dominated by “optimists” who uniformly overweight best outcomes in risky options. The choice pairs used here mostly do not provoke similarity-based simplifications. In a third experiment, the author shows that the presence of choice pairs that provoke similarity-based computational shortcuts does indeed flatten estimated probability weighting functions.

Citation

Wilcox, N.T. (2023), "Unusual Estimates of Probability Weighting Functions", Harrison, G.W. and Ross, D. (Ed.) Models of Risk Preferences: Descriptive and Normative Challenges (Research in Experimental Economics, Vol. 22), Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 69-106. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0193-230620230000022002