To read this content please select one of the options below:

Faculty perspectives on accreditation, academic freedom and quality learning in private higher education institutes: empirical evidence

Mohammad Ali Ashraf (Department of Economics, United International University, Dhaka, Bangladesh)
Sarker Rafij Ahmed Ratan (School of Business and Economics, United International University, Dhaka, Bangladesh)
Tanzila Amir (Department of Economics, United International University, Dhaka, Bangladesh)
Mohd Hasanur Raihan Joarder (School of Business and Economics, United International University, Dhaka, Bangladesh)
Abu Rashed Osman (Faculty of Business, Sohar University, Sohar, Oman)

Quality Assurance in Education

ISSN: 0968-4883

Article publication date: 29 August 2024

1

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to investigate the effects of standardization, accreditation process on academic freedom and quality learning in higher education institutes (HEIs). In addition, this study explores the mediating effects of academic freedom between standardization, accreditation and learning.

Design/methodology/approach

To attain the objective, the study uses the theory of self-determination as its theoretical underpinning. The smart PLS-SEM technique is applied for analyzing data.

Findings

The results indicate that the accreditation process has a significant negative influence on faculty academic freedom and quality of learning in the sampled HEIs. There is also a significant mediating effect of academic freedom.

Research limitations/implications

There are a few limitations in this study. First, the study considers the faculty members only as respondents. Second, this study only considers the faculty members of private universities as respondents. In the future, public HEIs could also be included in similar studies. Finally, this research has been done in the context of a developing country.

Practical implications

The findings of the study have pervasive implications for the authorities in HEIs. The authorities of HEIs might capitalize on this evidence in formulating the appropriate policy for their HEIs.

Social implications

As the accreditation process weakens academic freedom and quality learning, accreditation should not be viewed as an institutional development and quality assurance tool. Rather, accreditation ought to allow for amplifying faculty voices, empowering faculty and protecting their rights.

Originality/value

Quantitative analysis on the subject addressed in the current study is scarce. Therefore, this research can be considered valuable for stakeholders of HEIs.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors are indebted to Kristen M. Gudgeon, Lecturer, Department of English, United International University, for her kind and invaluable efforts in proofreading and other comments.

Citation

Ashraf, M.A., Ratan, S.R.A., Amir, T., Joarder, M.H.R. and Osman, A.R. (2024), "Faculty perspectives on accreditation, academic freedom and quality learning in private higher education institutes: empirical evidence", Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-12-2023-0200

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2024, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles