Geographical proximity and value of corporate cash holdings

Abstract

Purpose

In this paper, the authors examine the association between a firm's geographical location and the value of its cash holdings.

Design/methodology/approach

Following Loughran and Schultz (2005) and Nielsson and Wójcik (2016), the authors define firms as either geographically remote or geographically proximate based on their distance to areas that are either largely populated or concentrated in financial expertise. We also estimate the marginal value of cash using the model developed by Faulkender and Wang (2006).

Findings

The authors find that the marginal value of cash is $0.10–$0.16 lower in remotely located firms than in geographically proximate firms. The lower marginal value of cash is prominent among remotely located firms with greater severity of information asymmetry. Our findings support the view that the inability of shareholders to closely monitor how managers use of firm cash may increase the perceived conflicts of interest associated with managers' cash spending and decrease the value of cash.

Originality/value

Previous studies try to explain the cash holdings puzzle by attributing it to CEO overconfidence, external funding constraints, poor corporate governance, difference in corporate financial policy, poor investor protection, lack of firm diversification and large operating losses. This study contributes to the extant literature by offering new evidence of the role of geographic location on the value of cash holdings.

Citation

Palkar, D.D., Sims, R.L. and Kuvvet, E. (2020), "Geographical proximity and value of corporate cash holdings", Managerial Finance, Vol. 46 No. 9, pp. 1101-1122. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-09-2019-0470