Investigating the relationship between director’s profile, board interlocks and corporate social responsibility

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to discuss a research model that presents three metrics of corporate social performance (CSP): board interlocks, director’s profile and corporate social responsibility (CSR).

Design/methodology/approach

Based on social network theories, the authors argue the possible relationships between the three variables. The authors conduct the study on 255 directorships in the boards of 20 listed companies in France, which participate in Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) for 2010.

Findings

The results show that director’s background and nationality diversity in the board are the most relevant attributes to discerning firms with high CSR scores. However, the relationship between board interlocks and CSR is not consistent. Some explanations are reported and discussed.

Research limitations/implications

The research contributes to recognize the most influential variables in board composition for firms with high CSR scores, although it is based on a conceptual development and an explorative analysis. It could constitute the basis for future research which integrates modeling and multivariate analysis.

Practical implications

Diversity in the board could be an effective tool to guide management for more CSR decisions.

Social implications

The paper highlights the importance of diversifying the recruitment base when integrating new board members. This implies opening board networks to new profiles, in order to better meet stakeholders’ expectations regarding CSR.

Originality/value

The paper contributes to board literature by highlighting the importance of combining individual attributes (director) with corporate ones (board of directors) to better assess the role of board of directors in the adoption of CSR’ practices.

Citation

Ben Barka, H. and Dardour, A. (2015), "Investigating the relationship between director’s profile, board interlocks and corporate social responsibility", Management Decision, Vol. 53 No. 3, pp. 553-570. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-12-2013-0655