To read this content please select one of the options below:

The effect of restatements on office-level audit quality

Jonathan Nash (Department of Accounting and Finance, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, USA)
Cristina Bailey (Department of Accounting, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA)

Managerial Auditing Journal

ISSN: 0268-6902

Article publication date: 10 June 2024

Issue publication date: 9 July 2024

129

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to provide evidence on how the issuance of a nonreliance restatement affects non-restating clients of the same audit office.

Design/methodology/approach

To test the effect of restatement issuance on office-level quality, this study runs regressions using both input- and output-based measures of audit quality.

Findings

This study finds that in the years where one or more clients of an audit office issue a restatement, audit effort is lower for non-restating clients of the same office. When two or more clients issue a restatement, other clients are charged lower audit fees, file later and are more likely to experience an audit failure.

Originality/value

This study contributes to the literature on office-level audit quality and provides an explanation for the longitudinal correlation of office-level audit failures.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Data availability: Data are available from the public sources listed in the text.

Citation

Nash, J. and Bailey, C. (2024), "The effect of restatements on office-level audit quality", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 39 No. 5, pp. 500-521. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-09-2022-3709

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2024, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles