To read this content please select one of the options below:

A tale of two frameworks: charting a path to lifelong learning for physician leaders through CanMEDS and LEADS

Ming-Ka Chan (Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada)
Graham Dickson (School of Leadership Studies, Royal Roads University, Victoria, Canada and Canadian Society of Physician Leaders, Ottawa, Canada)
David A. Keegan (Department of Family Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada)
Jamiu O. Busari (Department of Educational Development and Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands and Department of Pediatrics, Horacio Oduber Hospital, Oranjestad, Aruba)
Anne Matlow (Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada)
John Van Aerde (Canadian Society of Physician Leaders, Ottawa, Canada)

Leadership in Health Services

ISSN: 1751-1879

Article publication date: 9 November 2021

Issue publication date: 10 January 2022

264

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper was to determine the complementarity between the Canadian Medical Education Directions for Specialists (CanMEDS) physician competency and LEADS leadership capability frameworks from three perspectives: epistemological, philosophical and pragmatic. Based on those findings, the authors propose how the frameworks collectively layout pathways of lifelong learning for physician leadership.

Design/methodology/approach

Using a qualitative approach combining critical discourse analysis with a modified Delphi, the authors examined “How complementary the CanMEDS and LEADS frameworks are in guiding physician leadership development and practice” with the following sub-questions: What are the similarities and differences between CanMEDS and LEADS from: An epistemological and philosophical perspective? The perspective of guiding physician leadership training and practice? How can CanMEDS and LEADS guide physician leadership development from medical school to retirement?

Findings

Similarities and differences exist between the two frameworks from philosophical and epistemological perspectives with significant complementarity. Both frameworks are founded on a caring ethos and value physician leadership – CanMEDS (for physicians) and LEADS (physicians as one of many professions) define leadership similarly. The frameworks share beliefs in the function of leadership, embrace a belief in distributed leadership, and although having some philosophical differences, have a shared purpose (preparing for changing health systems). Practically, the frameworks are mutually supportive, addressing leadership action in different contexts and where there is overlap, complement one another in intent and purpose.

Originality/value

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first paper to map the CanMEDS (physician competency) and LEADS (leadership capabilities) frameworks. By determining the complementarity between the two, synergies can be used to influence physician leadership capacity needed for today and the future.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of Ms Danielle Kiss, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, for her copy editing of the manuscript, and Ms Roberta Reid, Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, for her assistance in coordinating research meetings.

Citation

Chan, M.-K., Dickson, G., Keegan, D.A., Busari, J.O., Matlow, A. and Van Aerde, J. (2022), "A tale of two frameworks: charting a path to lifelong learning for physician leaders through CanMEDS and LEADS", Leadership in Health Services, Vol. 35 No. 1, pp. 46-73. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHS-04-2021-0032

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles