Supply chain risk management: manufacturing- and service-oriented firms
Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management
ISSN: 1741-038X
Article publication date: 22 January 2018
Issue publication date: 26 February 2018
Abstract
Purpose
A risk, when it occurs, causes negative effects on outputs. Typically, risks are not independent as multiple risks occur simultaneously. The purpose of this paper is to compare the impact various risks have on the performance of manufacturing-oriented and service-oriented firms from a supply chain (SC) perspective.
Design/methodology/approach
First, SC risks were identified and classified into two criteria: context and probability. Then, the different characteristics between manufacturing- and service-oriented firms were distinguished by the theory of goods-dominant logic (GDL) and service-dominant logic (SDL). Structural equations modeling and multiple-group analysis were then used to validate research hypotheses and compare the two groups.
Findings
The empirical evidence, gathered from the Vietnamese construction sector, indicated that in a serious situation all of the five risks proposed occur at the same time, thus the remarkable 87.1% variance in SC performance was explained. Furthermore, this rate is significant when the two groups are compared: manufacturing-oriented firms (88.3 percent) and service-oriented firms (85.6 percent), implying that risks in the manufacturing-oriented group have a greater effect on SC performance. While manufacturing-oriented companies should pay close attention to the operational and demand risks that adversely affect SC performance, they should treat information risk as an opportunity to improve. Service-oriented companies, however, need to manage supply risk which, in their case, can be attributed to a 51.2 percent variance in SC performance. Moreover, service quality can also be improved remarkably if information risk is well managed.
Research limitations/implications
This study provides a detailed picture of the relationship between risks and performance in the SC. Risks are illustrated as affecting the SC performance simultaneously, (not separately) and so the approach outlined here will give firms a comprehensive view of their SCs and provide guidelines for predicting the impact risks will have on the SC performance. Moreover, by comparing manufacturing- and service-oriented firms, a thorough overview of risk behaviors is provided and appropriate solutions for each type of company can be determined.
Originality/value
The “novelty of approach” of this study is in applying GDL and SDL theory to classify the manufacturing-oriented and service-oriented firms. The different characteristics between the two groups are identified and explained in terms of resources, value, network, effectiveness vs efficiency and communication, thus providing an insight into risk management activities in the SC network.
Keywords
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the project of “An empirical study on services value chain based on the experiential and credibility values” (Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) No. 25240050), and Japanese Government by Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) through AUN/SEED-Net Project: 022674.242.2015/JICA-AC. Also, the authors respectfully thank the editor and reviewers for their constructive and augmentable comments which enabled the authors to improve the earlier version of this paper.
Citation
Truong, H.Q. and Hara, Y. (2018), "Supply chain risk management: manufacturing- and service-oriented firms", Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 218-239. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-07-2017-0145
Publisher
:Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited