New growth in cross-border E-business: evidence from gray forecasting to cross-border E-business in China

Da Huo (School of International Trade and Economics, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing, China)
Rihui Ouyang (China Center of Internet Economics, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing, China)
Aidi Tang (School of International Trade and Economics, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing, China)
Wenjia Gu (School of International Trade and Economics, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing, China)
Zhongyuan Liu (High School Affiliated to Renmin University of China, Beijing, China)

Journal of Internet and Digital Economics

ISSN: 2752-6356

Article publication date: 25 April 2024

Issue publication date: 20 May 2024

154

Abstract

Purpose

This paper delves into cross-border E-business, unraveling its intricate dynamics and forecasting its future trajectory.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper projects the prospective market size of cross-border E-business in China for the year 2023 using the GM (1,1) gray forecasting model. Furthermore, to enhance the analysis, the paper attempts to simulate and forecast the size of China’s cross-border E-business sector using the GM (1,3) gray model. This extended model considers not only the historical trends of cross-border E-business but also the growth patterns of GDP and the digital economy.

Findings

The forecast indicates a market size of 18,760 to 18,934 billion RMB in 2023, aligning with the consistent growth observed in previous years. This suggests a sustained positive trajectory for cross-border E-business.

Originality/value

Cross-border e-commerce critically shapes China’s global integration and traditional industry development. The research in this paper provides insights beyond statistical trends, contributing to a nuanced understanding of the pivotal role played by cross-border e-commerce in shaping China’s economic future.

Keywords

Citation

Huo, D., Ouyang, R., Tang, A., Gu, W. and Liu, Z. (2024), "New growth in cross-border E-business: evidence from gray forecasting to cross-border E-business in China", Journal of Internet and Digital Economics, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 12-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIDE-01-2024-0003

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2024, Da Huo, Rihui Ouyang, Aidi Tang, Wenjia Gu and Zhongyuan Liu

License

Published in Journal of Internet and Digital Economics. Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode


1. Introduction

China has consistently been at the forefront of growth and innovation in the global digital retail landscape, seamlessly transitioning from digital trade to cross-border e-commerce. According to an April 2023 report on the development of digital China, as of 2022, the scale of China’s digital economy has surged to 50.2 trillion yuan (approximately 7.25 trillion US$), constituting a substantial 41.5% of the GDP. Remarkably, China holds the title of the world’s largest e-commerce market, with transactions totaling US$ 1.5 trillion (RMB 42.3 trillion) in 2021 – a remarkable 20% surge from the previous year. This figure surpasses the combined e-transactions of France, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States. Despite the preference of US citizens for online shopping, the UNCTAD Annual Report 2020 reveals that an astonishing 56.67% of global online retail sales are directed toward e-commerce platforms based in China, highlighting the exponential surge in e-commerce retail metrics. Moreover, China’s demographic landscape, boasting the world’s highest population base, emphasizes the significant demand it generates, facilitating the processing of nearly 50% of global transactions. As of December 2021, the Chinese e-commerce user base had burgeoned to 842 million individuals, constituting a remarkable 81.6% of the total netizen population – an increase of 59.68 million users compared to December 2020. Furthermore, China claims the position of the globe’s largest mobile payment market, amassing a revenue of RMB 2,976 trillion in 2021.

In consideration of the aforementioned background, this study employs the GM (1,1) gray forecasting model to project the prospective market size of cross-border E-business in China for the year 2023. The research endeavors to delve deeper into the landscape of cross-border E-business by initiating an in-depth examination of its future trajectory. This involves scrutinizing the various dynamics, including technological advancements, regulatory changes and consumer behaviors, that could influence the trajectory of cross-border E-business. Furthermore, to enhance the analysis and provide a more comprehensive forecast, the study incorporates the GM (1,3) gray forecasting model. This extended model takes into account not only the historical trends of cross-border E-business but also factors in the growth patterns of GDP and the digital economy. By integrating these additional dimensions, the study aims to offer a nuanced understanding of the complex interplay between economic indicators and the cross-border E-business sector. The forecasting outcomes reveal a projected market size ranging between 18,760 and 18,934 billion RMB for the year 2023. This consistent growth projection aligns with the observed performance trends in the preceding years, indicating a sustained positive trajectory for cross-border E-business in China. The study, therefore, not only provides valuable insights into the anticipated market size but also offers a robust foundation for strategic planning and decision-making in the dynamic landscape of cross-border E-business. The nuanced approach of considering multiple variables ensures a more accurate and holistic forecast, contributing to the reliability and applicability of the study’s findings for stakeholders in the cross-border E-business ecosystem.

The distinctive merits of cross-border e-commerce, in comparison to traditional business frameworks, are noteworthy. Unlike conventional retailing, the cross-border e-commerce model boasts economic advantages, characterized by cost-effectiveness and substantial discounts. Simultaneously, it offers lifestyle advantages, including convenience, time efficiency, a diverse array of choices and a streamlined ordering process. By separating the shopping and payment processes, consumers can make better use of their fragmented time, reducing impulsive purchases and aligning with today’s fast-paced lifestyles (Lai et al., 2014; Duarte et al., 2018). Moreover, cross-border e-commerce exhibits distinctive social advantages relative to its domestic counterpart, particularly in the democratization of knowledge. The abundance of diverse goods, services and global information allows consumers to engage with a myriad of cultural perspectives, thereby enhancing their insights into and fostering the cultivation of an international outlook. The evolution of cross-border e-commerce in China is driven by the co-innovation of profit, marketing and regulatory paradigms (He and Xu, 2018). The integration of “online–offline” marketing channels within cross-border e-commerce plays a pivotal role in advancing digital industrialization, industrial digitization and governance digitization in China’s developmental framework. This integration has the potential to catalyze regional economic transformation, leveraging ecological advantages to radiate influence on the surrounding economic landscape (Ni, 2022). Furthermore, the catalytic impact of cross-border e-commerce extends beyond its operational dimensions, ushering in prospects for the economic development model in the digital age. This is achieved through adept integration with traditional industries, international trade, cross-border financial services and the emerging field of domestic new urbanization (Liu, 2017). The interplay between cross-border e-commerce and these sectors delineates an emergent economic landscape, highlighting the dynamic synergy between digital innovation and traditional economic paradigms.

Overall, the benefits of studying cross-border e-commerce can be summarized in the following three points. Firstly, augmenting investment in cross-border e-commerce holds the potential to markedly enhance the overall developmental caliber of China’s digital economy. Despite the rapid volumetric expansion, challenges demand immediate attention, including information asymmetry (Mavlanova et al., 2012; Li et al., 2023), infringement issues (Huang and Li, 2019) and deficiencies in ancillary facilities concerning production safety and labor protection. Cross-border e-commerce can bolster the overseas market performance of low-cost, low-value-added small commodities, introducing distinctive “selling points” and engendering unique appeal for these small goods. Simultaneously, it can uncover new growth avenues for high-value-added goods and services within more expansive and diversified international markets. Secondly, digital trade stands poised as a pivotal driver for the nation’s deepened integration into the international arena. The digital realm can propel the ongoing standardization of trade patterns (Polyanin et al., 2019). The robust evolution of e-commerce models plays a pivotal role in curtailing transaction costs (Garicano and Kaplan, 2001), streamlining processes (Eastin, 2002), mitigating barriers and reducing the threshold impact of the Internet on exports. Digital technologies also play a role in fostering international trust mechanisms (Aljifri et al., 2003). Cross-border e-commerce leverages the loosely coupled organizational attributes of platforms and their inclusive, open ecological advantages, striving to encompass participants from diverse nations (Li et al., 2019). This approach not only furnishes an environment and technical support framework for profound international collaborations (Niehoff et al., 2022; Veile et al., 2022) but also, through internal cooperation mechanisms, implicitly cultivates and fortifies the international trust system (e.g. Niu et al., 2019; Yan et al., 2021; Fan et al., 2023). China’s established digital leadership strategically positions it to proactively engage in global digital cooperation, bearing paramount significance in reshaping the international order and forming a crucial foundation for the forthcoming intensive permeation of the global cooperation network during the smart economy era. Thirdly, further scholarly exploration into cross-border e-commerce holds considerable promise. Scholars have delved into unraveling its multifaceted role in fostering international trade expansion, examining dimensions such as trade distance, consumer welfare and policy shocks (Wang et al., 2017). As a nascent trade paradigm, cross-border e-commerce is poised to transcend its current role, catalyzing its ascendancy in diverse realms, including the invigoration of consumption dynamics and catalyzing consumption upgrading (e.g. Huo, 2023). It acts as a transformative force, steering traditional industries toward intelligent and hybrid development, with the capacity to enhance ecological sustainability and elevate global welfare levels (e.g. Chang and Uden, 2008; Almeida et al., 2020; Gamidullaeva et al., 2021; Zhang, 2021). These potentials can be achieved through judiciously designed mechanisms, such as the sharing of digital resources, cultivation of mutual trust channels and robust international economic collaboration, necessitating strategic interventions exemplified by the establishment of various “e-commerce plus” models.

The subsequent sections of this paper are structured as follows. The second segment presents a thorough literature review, constructing a macroscopic theoretical analytical framework rooted in the ecological advantage perspective. This effort aims to elucidate the role of cross-border e-commerce development in cultivating competitive advantages at the industry level, positioning Chinese enterprises not only to endure but also to triumph in the progressively intensifying global ecological competition. The third section delves into the intricacies of research design, encompassing the delineation of the model, the articulation of analytical concepts and details related to data sources, variable selection and the chosen research methodology. The fourth section provides an exhaustive account of our research findings, concurrently engaging in a comparative discourse with existing studies. The fifth part delineates the primary conclusions derived from our study, encapsulating a synthesis of theoretical contributions and pragmatic implications. The final section articulates targeted policy recommendations, spanning the realms of scenario and culture, mixed industry development and the fortification of platform ecological responsibility.

2. Theoretical background and literature review

In the realm of e-commerce, where the value primarily comes from new transactions, the complexity poses a challenge for any single classical theory to fully understand and predict its performance. To address this, Amit and Zott (2001) integrated previous perspectives, identifying four key dimensions: efficiency, complementarity, lock-in effect, and innovation. They introduced a business circle concept, encompassing supplier (complementors), partner, and customer segments—a seminal yet nebulous prototype of the e-commerce platform ecosystem. Subsequent literature has deepened our understanding of the intricacies surrounding the e-commerce platform ecology, recognizing its ecological and systemic facets (e.g. Liu et al., 2013). Tian et al. (2014) further advanced the structural model of e-commerce market analysis, grounding their innovations in ecological theory and network science. Despite these advancements shaping a foundational systematic framework, there remains a noticeable gap in research perspectives' innovation. The current discourse has inadequately addressed the catalytic effect of the e-commerce ecosystem on industry development and the comprehensive dynamic analysis concerning the linkage and interaction among platform elements. In response to these observations, a growing group of scholars has embraced the concept of digital ecology, integrating innovation, information, strategy, and organizational management into a unified framework. Their research on the platform-specific advantages of the ecosystem provides a more nuanced explanation of the e-commerce model, aligning better with its logic of co-creating value. In this context, this paper maintains its focus on the ecological advantage perspective, aiming to construct a coherent theoretical framework. The overall goal is to explore the inherent characteristics and developmental logic of e-commerce, seeking to complement and expand the existing literature in terms of both breadth and depth.

In the upcoming literature review section, we will expand our framework to explore how e-commerce growth impacts cross-industry interactions from broader perspectives. Initially, we’ll highlight the unique advantages of e-commerce in catering to small markets and micro-groups, focusing on its success in the paradigm of small-scale technology. Our analysis will delve into the catalytic role of digital ecological advantages, customization, and scenario matching. Subsequently, we’ll then project potential trajectories for e-commerce evolution. The paper will also examine how digitalization contributes to the intelligent transformation of traditional industries and the development of mixed industries, particularly focusing on how digital technology influences smart growth and fosters environmental benefits across diverse fields. Additionally, acknowledging the extensive impact of ecosystem social responsibility, we expand the traditional Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) paradigm. Informed by existing research and e-commerce model characteristics, we scrutinize the environmental performance of digital trade in e-commerce. Systematically outlining key areas in the academic community related to digital ecosystem social responsibility, we present current and future trends in the literature. We argue that the e-commerce industry’s future trajectory will witness further innovation and diversification within the service scenario, fostering synergistic and inclusive growth through digital-intelligent transformations and shaping its long-term development path.

2.1 A new application of small-scale technology theory

The small-scale technology theory, initially proposed by Wells (1977, 1983), represents an early milestone in exploring the role of transnational corporations (TNCs) in developing countries. The prevailing argument suggests that a strategic competitive edge is achieved by developing small-scale production technologies tailored to the specific needs of small markets, especially in labor-intensive industries (e.g. Anderson, 1982; Liedholm and Mead, 1987; Schmitz, 1995; Frijns and Van Vliet, 1999). This approach can purportedly facilitate the convergence of social, economic, and environmental benefits more easily (Burton and Hubacek, 2007). These small-scale markets typically have low demand, making it unfeasible for companies from developed countries to enter due to the difficulty of achieving economies of scale. However, existing research on this theory has two main shortcomings: an overly absolute and delimited definition of technology, and a lack of recognition of the positive impacts of small-scale markets on industrial development (Romijn, 2001). Despite the growing interdisciplinary research (e.g. Dinham, 2003) based on this theory, research tends to focus more on the theory’s application rather than on its innovation and systematic refinement.

We pioneeringly assume that research rooted in the domain of e-commerce holds promise for ameliorating the aforementioned theoretical gaps to a certain extent. On one facet, the e-commerce ecosystem emerges as an apt conduit for the proliferation of intangible or “soft” products, including ethnic elements and culture, thereby expanding the ambit of traditional technological advantages from a service and innovation perspective. Concurrently, the small-scale markets cultivated through the alignment of nuanced demand and bespoke services constitute the primary revenue source within the e-commerce paradigm. Intensive exploration of this mode’s evolution may contribute to a more holistic comprehension of scenario-based markets and intensive services.

2.1.1 Digital inclusion and market segmentation

Primarily, from a supply-side perspective, the entry of numerous small-scale and less efficient producers lays the foundation for the formation of the e-commerce ecosystem and its small-scale technological edge. These vendors avoid relying on economies of scale or scope for cost reduction. Instead, they choose to gain premium pricing and competitiveness through differentiation. The capacity of the Internet to furnish SMEs with opportunities and facilitate competitiveness in global markets is widely recognized (e.g. Ramsey et al., 2003; Dholakia and Kshetri, 2004; Levenburg et al., 2005). Digital inclusion positions e-commerce strategically to attract a diverse array of small-scale producers by mitigating entry barriers. This model effectively extends greater financial accessibility for small and medium-sized sellers, reducing the cost of integration into the digital financial system and diversifying the array of financial products and services. This, in turn, fosters inclusive growth within the ecosystem, harnessing the innate advantages of digital platforms (Wirdiyanti et al., 2023). In conclusion, e-commerce, facilitated by the establishment of digital platforms and online communities, nurtures small-scale marketplaces while adeptly catering to niche segments (Turowski, 2002; Koch and Moslein, 2005; Chen, 2021).

Furthermore, when considering the demand aspect, the e-commerce paradigm, characterized by goods diversification and demand intricacy, inherently tends towards market segmentation, giving rise to numerous heterogeneous small-scale markets. These market segments form organically, unlike traditional divisions based on geography, driven by intricate factors including psychological, social, and demographic aspects (e.g. Liu et al., 2015; Ballestar et al., 2018; Muchardie et al., 2019). The evolution of digital technology, alongside the refinement of business intelligence tools and optimization of decision-making models, robustly supports the nuanced analysis of segmented niches and the formulation of tailored strategies for distinct segments (Beheshtian-Ardakani et al., 2018; Kamthania et al., 2018; Tiwari et al., 2018; Dolnicar, 2022). Hence, we contend that the strategic alignment of scenarios facilitated by digital advantages is pivotal for enhancing the e-commerce model’s efficacy in meeting the nuanced needs of small-scale markets.

2.1.2 Ethnic marketing and price advantage

A broader interpretation of the small-scale technology theory suggests that firms in emerging markets can establish competitiveness by exporting ethnic products, specifically targeting small-scale markets formed by the same ethnic group abroad. This approach focuses on fostering stable trade relationships rooted in cultural affinities (Wells, 1983). With the export-oriented impacts of digitalization (Von Arnim and Mrozewski, 2020; Elia et al., 2021; Eduardsen et al., 2023) and performance optimization mechanisms (Yao et al., 2023; Yang et al., 2023), e-commerce enables local small-scale producers to more effectively serve international markets in comparison to traditional direct investment models. The evolution of information and communication technology (ICT) facilitates communication between local merchants and overseas ethnic markets, overcoming geographical and time zone constraints through digital platforms, thereby enhancing logistics responsiveness and service quality (Zou and Cheshmehzangi, 2022). Additionally, the eco-cooperation mechanisms that drive the e-commerce model streamline resource allocation (Mason and Mouzas, 2012; Li et al., 2019; Fan et al., 2023). This allows sellers to modularize production, marketing, transportation, and after-sales services, flexibly distributing them between domestic and foreign markets as well as online and offline channels, without the need for establishing overseas factories. Furthermore, the small-scale technology theory underscores that firms in emerging markets gain competitive advantages through low production costs and competitive pricing strategies (Wells, 1983). This synergy between low-cost strategies and digital marketing in e-commerce not only promotes affordability but also boosts the platform’s overall competitiveness.

2.2 The empowerment of digital advancement in cross-sector development

2.2.1 Digitally enabled smart industries

Digitalization empowers industries by optimizing resource allocation through new infrastructures, circular economy models, and ecosystem advantages (Cioffi et al., 2020). Current scholarly discussions primarily focus on smart industries, examining how digitalization catalyzes intelligent production and manufacturing. There is a prevailing consensus asserting that the concentration, connectivity, and interaction of digital factors are foundational for intelligent development (e.g. Cioffi et al., 2020; Eichstädt et al., 2021; Kumar et al., 2021). For example, digital twin technology enhances simulation computing, visualization, and analytics in the industrial Internet, opening new possibilities for intelligent industrial systems across manufacturing, regulation, and service domains (Cheng et al., 2020; Lin et al., 2021). Scholars such as Salvatore and Stefano (2021) and Dornelles et al. (2022) suggest that digital technologies oriented toward intelligent operations can enhance worker performance, contributing significantly to industrial sector growth.

Digitalization plays a crucial role not only in industrial sectors but also in various fields, such as smart agriculture, which serves as a significant catalyst for the high-quality development of China’s foundational industries and the growth of the rural economy (Li and Nanseki, 2023; Bhuyan et al., 2022). Firstly, communication technologies, especially those based on the Internet of Things (IoT), facilitate efficient digital flow within complex ecological networks. This connectivity enables precision agriculture, commonly referred to as smart agriculture, by enabling real-time communication between diverse devices (Khanna and Kaur, 2019; Tao et al., 2021). Furthermore, smart agriculture employs digital intelligence algorithms to provide personalized recommendations for consumers (Huo, 2021). Moreover, the e-commerce model transforms traditional offline transactions into a digital ecosystem, increasing profits with higher turnover rates (Zhu et al., 2021; Ramirez-Asis et al., 2022). It also benefits from channel extension and innovative marketing models, particularly for agricultural products that emphasize freshness (Ma and Zhang, 2022). Simultaneously, it ensures the safety of digital transactions through real-time tracking and sharing mechanisms, thus ensuring strict control over the quality and safety of agricultural products (Zhu et al., 2021; Ramirez-Asis et al., 2022).

2.2.2 Cross-industry development: linkage and synergy effect

Considerable research has delved into the spillover effects linked to intelligent industry development (Min et al., 2019; Kim and Kim, 2023; Wang et al., 2021; Dong et al., 2023). The growth of cross-sector digital ecosystems, exemplified by e-commerce, significantly enhances interaction between businesses from different fields based on network connections. This dynamic fosters the simultaneous advancement of multidisciplinary science and technology, maximizing synergistic effects derived from ecological advantages (Gamidullaeva et al., 2021; Yamaka et al., 2023).

We argue that e-commerce facilitates mixed-industry development as follows. Firstly, e-commerce serves as a foundational force for mixed-industry emergence by drawing stakeholders into the platform economy for cost savings. This involves a refined division of labor and leveraging comparative advantages for optimal resource allocation. Organic collaboration is crucial for value addition within the e-commerce ecosystem (Li et al., 2019; Fang et al., 2023). Secondly, digital models enhance industrial synergies, such as the synergistic development mechanism between digital financial inclusion and technological innovation, aligning with the inclusive nature of e-commerce (Sun et al., 2023). The shift to online transactions driven by e-commerce necessitates improved payment models, including better credit provisions, diverse financing channels, transparent transaction processes, and secure capital flows. Furthermore, enhanced digital business infrastructure, coupled with overall financial market development, supports an efficient digital system tailored to mixed-industry dynamics. Simultaneously, the trajectory toward industry intelligence facilitates the effective accumulation of innovative capital, offering greater prospects for support.

2.3 Digital ecosystem social responsibilities: re-examination of the ESG framework

Compared to corporate social activities, social responsibility within the ecosystem, particularly in e-commerce, is more extensive and complex. This wider scope is subject to stricter regulations and higher risks. The traditional research model for Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) may fall short of encapsulating the entire ambit of ecological social responsibility. There’s an urgent need to reform the research approach to social responsibility. This reform entails a comprehensive review of the social performance in digital ecosystems and ongoing enhancement of their self-regulatory governance.

Contemporary scholarship on digital eco-governance is directed towards both economic and social dimensions. Specifically, economic governance aspires to integrate the profit imperative across stakeholders, enhancing the integration of external resources (Li et al., 2019). In contrast, social governance endeavors to establish and maintain long-term comparative advantages through social responsibility. Scholars have enriched research paradigms from corporate social responsibility (Montiel, 2008) to broader digital ecosystem responsibility (Yi et al., 2023). There’s a shift from prioritizing economic value to emphasizing social value, from traditional economic governance to broader forms of public and digital self-regulatory governance (Linders, 2012; Sihotang et al., 2023). Concurrently, numerous scholars emphasize the crucial role of eco-governance in understanding the societal impacts of the eco-economy’s progress (Chang and Uden, 2008; Almeida et al., 2020). This pursuit involves measuring social responsibility and performance within digital ecosystems. While each part of the digital ecosystem bears its social responsibilities, the aggregate social responsibility transcends mere summation. It requires adjustments based on positive or negative externalities within a particular ecological context (Yi et al., 2023). Illustratively, consider the e-commerce ecosystem, where platforms endowed with robust user-generated content (UGC) can harness the powerful word-of-mouth effect to effectively filter out low-quality products, saving costs on quality control. Conversely, platforms lacking evaluation information must implement additional regulations to manage misinformation (e.g. Wang and Yu, 2017). Furthermore, social quandaries often arise from conflicts among multiple stakeholders in platform ecosystems, as discussed by Shankar et al. (2008). Therefore, effective ecological governance involves addressing collective action dilemmas and reconciling diverse stakeholder objectives (Chen et al., 2022; Yi et al., 2023).

3. Research method

It is challenging to forecast data trends using statistical approaches and data mining tools with a small dataset due to the lack of information, and it is this issue that gray system theory seeks to address. Gray systems theory suggests that predicting systems containing both known and unknown or non-deterministic information involves predicting gray processes that vary within a certain orientation and are time-dependent. Although the phenomenon shown in the process is random and haphazard, it is ultimately orderly and bounded. Therefore, this collection of data possesses a potential law, and gray prediction involves using this law to establish a gray model for predicting the gray system (Vallée, 2008; Zhou and He, 2013; Liu et al., 2016). The gray system operates by collating the original data to seek the law of change. This method aims to understand the reality of the data’s underlying law by accumulating data to generate a gray sequence, thereby weakening its randomness and revealing its regularity. The process involves diminishing the influence of unknown factors in the gray system, amplifying the impact of known factors, and ultimately constructing a differential equation with time as the variable. Parameters in the equation are determined through mathematical methods to accurately predict the future development trend. The gray model is a popular forecasting technique for use with small datasets.

Based on the time-series data of cross-border e-commerce, this study has established a gray forecasting model GM (1,1) to forecast the expected market size of cross-border E-business in China in 2023. Further discussions on cross-border E-business in the future have also been carried out with the forecasting data of GDP and digital economy growth in the corresponding period. Cross-border e-commerce data from 2014 to 2022 is gathered from both the China E-commerce Research Center and iiMedia Research. Additionally, GDP data is sourced from the National Bureau of Statistics, and information on the digital economy is obtained from the State Council of China’s official website.

4. Results

The application of the gray forecasting method proves to be instrumental in analyzing the anticipated growth of cross-border E-business in China. Specifically, the GM (1,1) gray forecasting model is employed to predict the expected market size of cross-border E-business in China for the year 2023, leveraging data from 2014 to 2022, a period marked by the development of cross-border E-business pilot cities. The results, as illustrated in Figure 1, indicate a forecasted market size of 18,934 billion RMB in 2023, affirming a consistent growth trajectory based on the performance observed in the preceding years.

Extending the analysis, the GM (1,3) gray forecasting model is applied to predict the expected market size of cross-border E-business in China for 2023, taking into account the growth of GDP and the digital economy. This forecast utilizes data spanning from 2014 to 2022. Figure 2 displays the outcome of the GM (1,3) gray forecasting, revealing a forecasted market size of 18,760 billion RMB in 2023. Notably, this result aligns closely with the outcome of the GM (1,1) gray forecasting, emphasizing the robustness of the forecasting method. The consistent and parallel projections further reinforce the expectation of a continued upward trend in the growth of cross-border E-business in China throughout 2023.

This methodological approach not only establishes the reliability of the forecasting models but also provides valuable insights into the multifaceted factors influencing cross-border E-business growth. By integrating the growth patterns of GDP and the digital economy, the extended analysis offers a comprehensive understanding of the interconnected dynamics shaping the future trajectory of the cross-border E-business sector. The close alignment of results from both forecasting models underlines the methodological rigor and consistency in predicting the market size, thereby contributing to a more robust basis for strategic planning and decision-making in the realm of cross-border E-business development in China.

5. Conclusion

The strategic significance of cross-border e-commerce in China extends beyond shaping developmental strategies. It serves as a linchpin for integrating traditional industries into the global market. This transformative force not only acts as a catalyst for economic growth but also significantly elevates the overall prosperity of digital trade, contributing to the enhanced developmental quality of China’s digital economy. We aim to delve deeper into the multifaceted landscape of cross-border E-business, unraveling its intricate dynamics and forecasting its future trajectory.

In pursuit of a more comprehensive understanding, we leverage the GM (1,1) gray forecasting model to project the anticipated market size of cross-border E-business in China for the year 2023. Furthermore, to enrich our analytical framework, we employ the GM (1,3) gray model, which not only takes into account historical trends in cross-border E-business but also factors in the growth patterns of GDP and the digital economy. The outcomes of our forecasting efforts unveil a projected market size ranging between 18,760 and 18,934 billion RMB for the year 2023. This steadfast growth projection aligns with the observed performance trends of the preceding years, painting a compelling picture of a sustained positive trajectory for cross-border E-business in China. As we unravel the layers of this complex landscape, our findings promise insights that transcend statistical trends, contributing to a nuanced understanding of the pivotal role played by cross-border e-commerce in shaping China’s economic future.

6. Countermeasures and suggestions

This section outlines targeted policy recommendations designed to leverage the unique advantages of e-commerce in catering to small markets, focusing on its success in the paradigm of small-scale technology. These recommendations include the application of scenario matching and cultural exportation. Additionally, the paper proposes strategies to enhance digital empowerment and industrial synergy, along with initiatives to strengthen eco-governments, enabling them to assume greater social responsibilities.

6.1 Apply scenario matching and cultural exportation

For online merchants, small-scale technology within the e-commerce paradigm does not inherently imply inefficient production. Each small market harbors distinct potential that necessitates exploration. Hence, concentrating on catering to a niche market need not be perceived as a drawback; on the contrary, it can be advantageous. The bespoke service model, crafted through meticulous scenario matching, constitutes the key to e-commerce profitability. The strategic pursuit of new opportunities and the scientific reconfiguration of resources, both internal and external to the platform, emerge as pivotal considerations for ecological layout. Therefore, this article contends that the e-commerce ecosystem warrants comprehensive construction and enhancement, with service innovation seamlessly integrated into platform transactions. Simultaneously, profound exploration and adept utilization of digital technology serve to elevate collective knowledge and capacity reconstruction within the ecosystem. This, in turn, propels the evolution of business models, mitigates innovation constraints and positions platforms to gradually amass technological and service scenario advantages amid the globally diversified ecological competition landscape.

Conversely, from the view of ethical industry diffusion, the boundaries of overseas micro-markets necessitate expansion. Cross-border e-commerce assumes an instrumental role in cultural diffusion, facilitating the exposure of local products to new clientele beyond ethnic group borders. Our assertion posits that digital resources can uniquely enhance the standardization of local products, thereby diminishing institutional and cultural distances between disparate market segments. Meanwhile, they function to assuage the doubtfulness of foreign consumers through the alleviation of information asymmetry, amplifying global awareness and acceptance of local products.

Furthermore, we posit that continued innovations in e-commerce models, exemplified by cross-border marketing, overseas warehousing and the burgeoning live-streaming economy, can surmount the constraints posed by the small-scale technology theory. In other words, the export of reverse innovations from emerging markets need not solely entail the absorption and transformation of “downgraded technology.” Rather, it can leverage digital dividends to empower small-scale producers by seizing market gaps and establishing authentic first-mover advantages. Consequently, e-commerce serves as a pivotal lever for propelling the overall prosperity of digital trade. The innovation of business models contributes to enhancing the quality of new retail development and overall value addition, thereby actualizing the sustained high-quality growth of the digital economy.

6.2 Enhance digital empowerment and industrial synergy

In light of the positive impact of digitization on various industries and its role in fostering mixed-industrial growth, this paper proposes the following recommendations. First and foremost, there is a need to extend the scope of intelligent industry transformation beyond manufacturing and technology sectors, encompassing additional domains. This necessitates increased support for primary industries and local enterprises, exemplified by promoting intelligent upgrades in foundational sectors and enhancing national industry digitization. Simultaneously, a strategic priority lies in deploying digital technologies to refine marketing strategies and enhance public experiences, expediting initiatives like smart living, intelligent services and enlightened governance. Moreover, innovation should progressively extend beyond manufacturing to include a diverse array of dimensions, covering coordination, organizational frameworks, spatial arrangements and decision-making paradigms. Establishing a scientific and efficacious monitoring and evaluation framework, coupled with robust feedback channels, is paramount within this trajectory. All industries should continuously assimilate lessons from tangible business gains and market responses, fine-tuning their digital strategies. Prioritizing data security and privacy protection is crucial to cultivating a bidirectional propulsion mechanism, where industry support fuels intelligent industrial transformation.

The strategic development of a digital innovation ecosystem, including the impact of e-commerce and new digital retail paradigms, is also crucial in tandem with the prevailing zeitgeist. This ecosystem should adeptly facilitate autonomous value creation, collaborative value co-creation, cumulative income amplification, self-regulatory governance and sustainable evolution. Consequently, this should stimulate original invention and the eventual realization of a more sophisticated cross-industry development model. The cooperative mechanism, based on resource complementarity and information distribution, should gradually reduce the platform’s hegemonic interference. Envisioned evolution aims to transcend the dual paradigm of “complementors-users”, extending its purview to encompass the macro-industry system and industrial ecology. This trajectory in mixed-industry development aspires to transform the foundational rationale of interoperability, progressing from loosely coupled superficial affiliations to deeply embedded, high-dimensional network clusters within the system’s architecture.

6.3 Strengthen eco-governments to assume greater social responsibilities

In digital e-commerce, social responsibility is contingent upon the business domain, necessitating tailored governance objectives for diverse ecologies. To progress, it is crucial to emphasize precision in social responsibility and establish comprehensive goals for digital governance. Goods retailers, as primary business players, must intensify their focus on effective eco-governance. Simultaneously, recognizing potential externalities arising from social tensions among various stakeholders in the platform’s operational processes is essential, both within and beyond the ecosystem. Seeking ways to benefit from institutional arbitrage by studying political, environmental, and social landscapes is vital. The goal is to find the optimal combination of public governance and economic benefit. Societies with weak institutions typically prioritize the economic and social benefits of new eco-entrants, fostering digital progress and creating jobs for underprivileged groups. Conversely, regions with advanced institutions are more concerned with balancing ecological welfare and social costs. Therefore, enhancing the net welfare of the local community becomes a pivotal strategy for such e-commerce modes to garner heightened local recognition and seize market prospects. This objective can be achieved through the self-management of each ecological player, efficient communication, and linkage mechanisms facilitated by the platform company’s coordination, and other collaborative mechanisms. As local embeddedness and adaptability increase, the scope of social responsibility should encompass an expanded provision of public goods and services within the ecological context.

With the rapid advancement of the digitalization process, digital e-commerce is progressively expanding its operational scope into the service sector. The prevailing trend centers around the online and digitally intelligent transformation of primary service scenarios. The domain of service-oriented e-commerce necessitates the resolution of social frictions among members within the ecosystem, which may derive from institutional and cultural disparities. Varying perspectives on the specific format and caliber of services rendered or received may emerge among participants, while geographical and time-zone differences can further hinder prompt and effective communication within the ecosystem. Hence, the establishment and enactment of norms within the ecosphere can significantly contribute to alleviating discrepancies and conflicts among its stakeholders. Concrete strategies to achieve this include bolstering technological inputs to standardize service quality provided by the supply side and enhancing platform governance to flexibly facilitate transactions between the supply and demand sectors. Simultaneously, ongoing efforts should be made to continuously refine existing eco-regulations, striving to align them more closely with the highest standards among participants. This approach ensures that elevated social benchmarks become internalized as unified norms across the entire ecosystem, enabling the fulfillment of social expectations through adherence to the highest standard. Consequently, the integration of commercial value propositions and social interests is realized, thereby expanding both the boundaries of the ecosphere and the scope of internationalization.

Figures

GM (1,1) gray forecasting of cross-border E-business in China in 2023

Figure 1

GM (1,1) gray forecasting of cross-border E-business in China in 2023

GM (1,3) gray forecasting of cross-border E-business in China in 2023

Figure 2

GM (1,3) gray forecasting of cross-border E-business in China in 2023

References

Aljifri, H.A., Pons, A. and Collins, D. (2003), “Global e‐commerce: a framework for understanding and overcoming the trust barrier”, Information Management and Computer Security, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 130-138, doi: 10.1108/09685220310480417.

Almeida, V., Filgueiras, F. and Gaetani, F. (2020), “Digital governance and the tragedy of the commons”, IEEE Internet Computing, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 41-46, doi: 10.1109/mic.2020.2979639.

Amit, R. and Zott, C. (2001), “Value creation in E‐business”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22 Nos 6-7, pp. 493-520, doi: 10.1002/smj.187.

Anderson, D. (1982), “Small industry in developing countries: a discussion of issues”, World Development, Vol. 10 No. 11, pp. 913-948, doi: 10.1016/0305-750x(82)90034-1.

Ballestar, M.T., Grau-Carles, P. and Sainz, J. (2018), “Customer segmentation in e-commerce: applications to the cashback business model”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 88, pp. 407-414, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.047.

Beheshtian-Ardakani, A., Fathian, M. and Gholamian, M. (2018), “A novel model for product bundling and direct marketing in e-commerce based on market segmentation”, Decision Science Letters, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 39-54, doi: 10.5267/j.dsl.2017.4.005.

Bhuyan, B.P., Tomar, R. and Cherif, A.R. (2022), “A systematic review of knowledge representation techniques in smart agriculture (urban)”, Sustainability, Vol. 14 No. 22, 15249, doi: 10.3390/su142215249.

Burton, J. and Hubacek, K. (2007), “Is small beautiful? A multicriteria assessment of small-scale energy technology applications in local governments”, Energy Policy, Vol. 35 No. 12, pp. 6402-6412, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.08.002.

Chang, V. and Uden, L. (2008), “Governance for e-learning ecosystem”, 2008 2nd IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies, IEEE, pp. 340-345.

Chen, S. (2021), “Analysis of customization strategy for e-commerce operation based on big data”, Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, Vol. 2021, pp. 1-11, doi: 10.1155/2021/6626480.

Chen, L., Li, S., Wei, J. and Yang, Y. (2022), “Externalization in the platform economy: social platforms and institutions”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 53 No. 8, pp. 1805-1816, doi: 10.1057/s41267-022-00506-w.

Cheng, J., Zhang, H., Tao, F. and Juang, C.-F. (2020), “DT-II: digital twin enhanced industrial internet reference framework towards smart manufacturing”, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 62, 101881, doi: 10.1016/j.rcim.2019.101881.

Cioffi, R., Travaglioni, M., Piscitelli, G., Petrillo, A. and Parmentola, A. (2020), “Smart manufacturing systems and applied industrial technologies for a sustainable industry: a systematic literature review”, Applied Sciences, Vol. 10 No. 8, p. 2897, doi: 10.3390/app10082897.

Dholakia, R.R. and Kshetri, N. (2004), “Factors impacting the adoption of the Internet among SMEs”, Small Business Economics, Vol. 23, pp. 311-322, doi: 10.1023/B:SBEJ.0000032036.90353.1f.

Dinham, B. (2003), “Growing vegetables in developing countries for local urban populations and export markets: problems confronting small‐scale producers”, Pest Management Science, Vol. 59 No. 5, pp. 575-582, doi: 10.1002/ps.654.

Dolnicar, S. (2022), “Market segmentation for e-tourism”, in Handbook of E-Tourism, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 849-863.

Dong, F., Li, G., Liu, Y., Xu, Q. and Li, C. (2023), “Spatial-temporal evolution and cross-industry synergy of carbon emissions: evidence from key industries in the city in Jiangsu Province, China”, Sustainability, Vol. 15 No. 5, p. 3881, doi: 10.3390/su15053881.

Dornelles, J.D.A., Ayala, N.F. and Frank, A.G. (2022), “Smart working in industry 4.0: how digital technologies enhance manufacturing workers' activities”, Computers and Industrial Engineering, Vol. 163, 107804, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2021.107804.

Duarte, P., Costa e Silva, S. and Ferreira, M.B. (2018), “How convenient is it? Delivering online shopping convenience to enhance customer satisfaction and encourage e-WOM”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 44, pp. 161-169, doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.06.007.

Eastin, M.S. (2002), “Diffusion of e-commerce: an analysis of the adoption of four e-commerce activities”, Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 251-267, doi: 10.1016/s0736-5853(01)00005-3.

Eduardsen, J., Marinova, S., Leonidou, L.C. and Christodoulides, P. (2023), “Organizational influences and performance impact of cross-border e-commerce barriers: the moderating role of home country digital infrastructure and foreign market internet penetration”, Management International Review, Vol. 63 No. 3, pp. 433-467, doi: 10.1007/s11575-023-00500-w.

Eichstädt, S., Gruber, M., Vedurmudi, A.P., Seeger, B., Bruns, T. and Kok, G. (2021), “Toward smart traceability for digital sensors and the industrial internet of things”, Sensors, Vol. 21 No. 6, p. 2019, doi: 10.3390/s21062019.

Elia, S., Giuffrida, M., Mariani, M.M. and Bresciani, S. (2021), “Resources and digital export: an RBV perspective on the role of digital technologies and capabilities in cross-border e-commerce”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 132, pp. 158-169, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.010.

Fan, Z., Wang, Y. and Ying, Z. (2023), “Empowerment of cross-border e-commerce platforms for small and medium-sized enterprises: evidence from China”, Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 33-44, doi: 10.1080/1051712x.2023.2175633.

Fang, H., Huo, Q. and Hatim, K. (2023), “Can digital services trade liberalization improve the quality of green innovation of enterprises? Evidence from China”, Sustainability, Vol. 15 No. 8, p. 6674, doi: 10.3390/su15086674.

Frijns, J. and Van Vliet, B. (1999), “Small-scale industry and cleaner production strategies”, World Development, Vol. 27 No. 6, pp. 967-983, doi: 10.1016/s0305-750x(99)00044-3.

Gamidullaeva, L., Tolstykh, T., Bystrov, A., Radaykin, A. and Shmeleva, N. (2021), “Cross-sectoral digital platform as a tool for innovation ecosystem development”, Sustainability, Vol. 13 No. 21, 11686, doi: 10.3390/su132111686.

Garicano, L. and Kaplan, S.N. (2001), “The effects of business‐to‐business e‐commerce on transaction costs”, The Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 49 No. 4, pp. 463-485, doi: 10.1111/1467-6451.00158.

He, W. and Xu, Y. (2018), “Cross-border electronic commerce development present situation and the innovation research in China”, American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, Vol. 8 No. 8, pp. 1825-1842, doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2018.88124.

Huang, W. and Li, X. (2019), “The e-commerce law of the People's Republic of China: e-commerce platform operators liability for third-party patent infringement”, Computer Law and Security Review, Vol. 35 No. 6, 105347, doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2019.105347.

Huo, Y. (2021), “Agricultural product e‐commerce recommendation system based on neural factorization machine in smart cities”, Internet Technology Letters, Vol. 4 No. 1, p. e216, doi: 10.1002/itl2.216.

Huo, D. (2023), “Digital intelligence technologies restructure global consumer markets innovatively”, Renmin Forum, Vol. 18, pp. 46-49.

Kamthania, D., Pawa, A. and Madhavan, S. (2018), “Market segmentation analysis and visualization using K-mode clustering algorithm for e-commerce business”, Journal of Computing and Information Technology, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 57-68, doi: 10.20532/cit.2018.1003863.

Khanna, A. and Kaur, S. (2019), “Evolution of internet of things (IoT) and its significant impact in the field of precision agriculture”, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, Vol. 157, pp. 218-231, doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.12.039.

Kim, C. and Kim, J. (2023), “Spatial spillovers of sport industry clusters and community resilience: bridging a spatial lens to building a smart tourism city”, Information Processing and Management, Vol. 60 No. 3, 103266, doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103266.

Koch, M. and Möslein, K.M. (2005), “Identities management for e-commerce and collaboration applications”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 11-29, doi: 10.1080/10864415.2005.11044339.

Kumar, M., Shenbagaraman, V.M., Shaw, R.N. and Ghosh, A. (2021), “Digital transformation in smart manufacturing with industrial robot through predictive data analysis”, Machine Learning for Robotics Applications, pp. 85-105, doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-0598-7_8.

Lai, J.-Y., Ulhas, K.R. and Lin, J.-D. (2014), “Assessing and managing e-commerce service convenience”, Information Systems Frontiers, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 273-289, doi: 10.1007/s10796-012-9344-2.

Levenburg, N.M., Schwarz, T.V. and Motwani, J. (2005), “Understanding adoption of internet technologies among SMEs”, Journal of Small Business Strategy (Archive Only), Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 51-70.

Li, D., Nanseki, T., Qian, D., Wang, P., Tang, D., Zhong, Y., Shang, Y., Guo, H., Wang, Z., Zhu, G. and Zhang, C. (2023), “Practice, promotion and perspective of smart agriculture in China”, Agricultural Innovation in Asia: Efficiency, Welfare, and Technology, Vol. 136 No. 9, pp. 183-203, doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-9086-1_12.

Li, J., Chen, L., Yi, J., Mao, J. and Liao, J. (2019), “Ecosystem-specific advantages in international digital commerce”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 50 No. 9, pp. 1448-1463, doi: 10.1057/s41267-019-00263-3.

Li, L., Fang, X. and Lim, Y.F. (2023), “Asymmetric information of product authenticity on C2C e-commerce platforms: how can inspection services help?”, Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 631-647, doi: 10.1287/msom.2023.1186.

Liedholm, C. and Mead, D.C. (1987), “Small scale industries in developing countries: empirical evidence and policy implications”, (No. 1094-2016-88092).

Lin, T.Y., Shi, G., Yang, C., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Jia, Z., Guo, L., Xiao, Y., Wei, Z. and Lan, S. (2021), “Efficient container virtualization-based digital twin simulation of smart industrial systems”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 281, 124443, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124443.

Linders, D. (2012), “From e-government to we-government: defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media”, Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 446-454, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003.

Liu, X. (2017), “The impact of cross-border e-commerce on the problems of Chinese economy new norms”, 2017 International Conference on Innovations in Economic Management and Social Science (IEMSS 2017), Atlantis Press, pp. 1395-1400.

Liu, Y., Li, H., Peng, G., Lv, B. and Zhang, C. (2015), “Online purchaser segmentation and promotion strategy selection: evidence from Chinese e-commerce market”, Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 233 No. 1, pp. 263-279, doi: 10.1007/s10479-013-1443-z.

Liu, H., Tian, Z. and Guan, X. (2013), “Analysis on complexity and evolution of e-commerce ecosystem”, International Journal of U-and E-Service, Science and Technology, Vol. 6 No. 6, pp. 41-50, doi: 10.14257/ijunesst.2013.6.6.05.

Liu, S., Yang, Y., Xie, N. and Forrest, J. (2016), “New progress of grey system theory in the new milennium”, Grey Systems: Theory and Application, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 2-31.

Ma, H. and Zhang, X. (2022), “Construction of smart marketing model of agricultural products e-commerce in the era of big data”, Mobile Information Systems, Vol. 2022, pp. 1-10, doi: 10.1155/2022/3016554.

Mason, K. and Mouzas, S. (2012), “Flexible business models”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 46 No. 10, pp. 1340-1367, doi: 10.1108/03090561211248062.

Mavlanova, T., Benbunan-Fich, R. and Koufaris, M. (2012), “Signaling theory and information asymmetry in online commerce”, Information and Management, Vol. 49 No. 5, pp. 240-247, doi: 10.1016/j.im.2012.05.004.

Min, Y.-K., Lee, S.-G. and Aoshima, Y. (2019), “A comparative study on industrial spillover effects among Korea, China, the USA, Germany and Japan”, Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 119 No. 3, pp. 454-472, doi: 10.1108/imds-05-2018-0215.

Montiel, I. (2008), “Corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability: separate pasts, common futures”, Organization and Environment, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 245-269, doi: 10.1177/1086026608321329.

Muchardie, B.G., Gunawan, A. and Aditya, B. (2019), “E-commerce market segmentation based on the antecedents of customer satisfaction and customer retention”, 2019 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech), pp. 103-108, doi: 10.1109/icimtech.2019.8843792.

Ni, W. (2022), “Online and offline integration development of Yiwu cross-border e-commerce in digital economy era”, Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 202, pp. 307-312, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.04.041.

Niehoff, S., Matthess, M., Zwar, C., Kunkel, S., Guan, T., Chen, L., Xue, B., de Oliveira Pereira Grudzien, D.I., Pinheiro de Lima, E. and Beier, G. (2022), “Sustainability related impacts of digitalisation on cooperation in global value chains: an exploratory study comparing companies in China, Brazil, and Germany”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 379, 134606, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134606.

Niu, B., Wang, J., Lee, C.K.M. and Chen, L. (2019), “‘Product + logistics’ bundling sale and co-delivery in cross-border e-commerce”, Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 915-941, doi: 10.1007/s10660-019-09379-y.

Polyanin, A., Golovina, T., Avdeeva, I., Vertakova, Y. and Kharlamov, A. (2019), “Standardization of business processes based on the use of digital platforms”, Proceedings of the 33rd International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA, pp. 3904-3912.

Ramirez-Asis, E., Bhanot, A., Jagota, V., Chandra, B., Hossain, M.S., Pant, K. and Almashaqbeh, H.A. (2022), “Smart logistic system for enhancing the farmer-customer corridor in smart agriculture sector using artificial intelligence”, Journal of Food Quality, Vol. 2022, pp. 1-8, doi: 10.1155/2022/7486974.

Ramsey, E., Ibbotson, P., Bell, J. and Gray, B. (2003), “E‐opportunities of service sector SMEs: an Irish cross‐border study”, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 250-264, doi: 10.1108/14626000310489709.

Romijn, H. (2001), “Technology support for small-scale industry in developing countries: a review of concepts and project practices”, Oxford Development Studies, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 57-76, doi: 10.1080/13600810124790.

Salvatore, M. and Stefano, R. (2021), “Smart operators: how industry 4.0 is affecting the worker's performance in manufacturing contexts”, Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 180, pp. 958-967, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.347.

Schmitz, H. (1995), “Collective efficiency: growth path for small‐scale industry”, The Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 529-566, doi: 10.1080/00220389508422377.

Shenkar, O., Luo, Y. and Yeheskel, O. (2008), “From ‘distance’ to ‘friction’: substituting metaphors and redirecting intercultural research”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 33 No. 4, pp. 905-923, doi: 10.5465/amr.2008.34421999.

Sihotang, D.M., Hidayanto, A.N. and Kurnia, S. (2023), “The e-government adoption ecosystem from the perspective of stakeholder theory: a case study on the village information systems in Indonesia”, Information Development, doi: 10.1177/02666669231192879.

Sun, Z., Cao, C., He, Z. and Feng, C. (2023), “Examining the coupling coordination relationship between digital inclusive finance and technological innovation from a spatial spillover perspective: evidence from China”, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Vol. 59 No. 4, pp. 1219-1231, doi: 10.1080/1540496x.2022.2120766.

Tao, W., Zhao, L., Wang, G. and Liang, R. (2021), “Review of the internet of things communication technologies in smart agriculture and challenges”, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, Vol. 189, 106352, doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106352.

Tian, Z., Zhan, Z. and Guan, X. (2014), “A new structural analysis model for e-commerce ecosystem network”, International Journal of Hybrid Information Technology, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 43-56, doi: 10.14257/ijhit.2014.7.1.04.

Tiwari, R., Saxena, M.K., Mehendiratta, P., Vatsa, K., Srivastava, S. and Gera, R. (2018), “Market segmentation using supervised and unsupervised learning techniques for e-commerce applications”, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 35 No. 5, pp. 5353-5363, doi: 10.3233/jifs-169818.

Turowski, K. (2002), “Agent-based e-commerce in case of mass customization”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 75 Nos 1-2, pp. 69-81, doi: 10.1016/s0925-5273(01)00182-7.

Vallée, R. (2008), “Grey information: theory and practical applications”, Kybernetes, Vol. 37 No. 1, p. 189, doi: 10.1108/k.2008.06737iaa.003.

Veile, J.W., Schmidt, M.-C. and Voigt, K.-I. (2022), “Toward a new era of cooperation: how industrial digital platforms transform business models in Industry 4.0”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 143, pp. 387-405, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.062.

Von Arnim, L. and Mrozewski, M. (2020), “Entrepreneurship in an increasingly digital and global world. Evaluating the role of digital capabilities on international entrepreneurial intention”, Sustainability, Vol. 12 No. 19, p. 7984, doi: 10.3390/su12197984.

Wang, Y. and Yu, C. (2017), “Social interaction-based consumer decision-making model in social commerce: the role of word of mouth and observational learning”, International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 179-189, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.11.005.

Wang, Y., Wang, Y. and Lee, S.H. (2017), “The effect of cross-border e-commerce on China's international trade: an empirical study based on transaction cost analysis”, Sustainability, Vol. 9 No. 11, p. 2028, doi: 10.3390/su9112028.

Wang, L., Chen, Y., Ramsey, T.S. and Hewings, G.J.D. (2021), “Will researching digital technology really empower green development?”, Technology in Society, Vol. 66, 101638, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101638.

Wells, L.T. (1977), “The internationalization of firms from developing countries”, Multinationals from Small Countries, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 133-156.

Wells, L.T. (1983), Third World Multinationals: The Rise of Foreign Investments from Developing Countries, MIT Press Books, Cambridge, Vol. 1.

Wirdiyanti, R., Yusgiantoro, I., Sugiarto, A., Harjanti, A.D., Mambea, I.Y., Soekarno, S. and Damayanti, S.M. (2023), “How does e-commerce adoption impact micro, small, and medium enterprises' performance and financial inclusion? Evidence from Indonesia”, Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 2485-2515, doi: 10.1007/s10660-022-09547-7.

Yamaka, W., Shi, R., Maneejuk, P. and Chi, C. (2023), “Spatial spillover effects of internet development on foreign trade in China”, Sustainability, Vol. 15 No. 5, p. 4213, doi: 10.3390/su15054213.

Yan, W., Zhou, H. and Li, H. (2021), “Scientific programming, decision and coordination of cross-border e-commerce supply chain: based on four modes of cooperation”, Scientific Programming, Vol. 2021, pp. 1-15, doi: 10.1155/2021/5561357.

Yang, Y., Chen, N. and Chen, H. (2023), “The digital platform, enterprise digital transformation, and enterprise performance of cross-border e-commerce —from the perspective of digital transformation and data elements”, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 777-794, doi: 10.3390/jtaer18020040.

Yao, Q., Tang, H., Boadu, F. and Xie, Y. (2023), “Digital transformation and firm sustainable growth: the moderating effects of cross-border search capability and managerial digital concern”, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 4929-4953, doi: 10.1007/s13132-022-01083-x.

Yi, J., Li, J. and Chen, L. (2023), “Ecosystem social responsibility in international digital commerce”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 54 No. 1, pp. 24-41, doi: 10.1057/s41267-022-00561-3.

Zhang, H. (2021), “Trade openness and green total factor productivity in China: the role of ICT-based digital trade”, Frontiers in Environmental Science, Vol. 9, 809339, doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2021.809339.

Zhou, W. and He, J.M. (2013), “Generalized GM (1, 1) model and its application in forecasting of fuel production”, Applied Mathematical Modelling, Vol. 37 No. 9, pp. 6234-6243, doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2013.01.002.

Zhu, Z., Bai, Y., Dai, W., Liu, D. and Hu, Y. (2021), “Quality of e-commerce agricultural products and the safety of the ecological environment of the origin based on 5G Internet of Things technology”, Environmental Technology and Innovation, Vol. 22, 101462, doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2021.101462.

Zou, T. and Cheshmehzangi, A. (2022), “ICT adoption and booming e-commerce usage in the COVID-19 era”, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 13, 916843, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.916843.

Corresponding author

Aidi Tang can be contacted at: aiditang@cufe.edu.cn

Related articles