Revitalizing comparative library and information science: theory and metatheory
Abstract
Purpose
This article is intended to stimulate theoretical reflection in international comparative studies in library and information science (comparative LIS).
Design/methodology/approach
The need for theory is emphasized and shortcomings in comparative LIS in respect of theory are identified. On the basis of literature from other comparative disciplines, a framework for examining issues of metatheory, methodology and methods is constructed. Against this background the role of theory and metatheory in the literature of comparative LIS is evaluated. General observations are illustrated using examples selected from comparative studies in LIS.
Findings
Much of the literature of comparative LIS is atheoretical and based on assumptions that reflect naive empiricism. Most comparativists in LIS fail to link their work to that of colleagues, so that no body of theory is built up. Insufficient use is made of theory from other social science disciplines. There is a little evidence of awareness of metatheoretical assumptions in the sociological, teleological, ontological, epistemological and ethical dimensions.
Research limitations/implications
While general observations are presented about the literature of comparative LIS, this is not a bibliometric study. Issues of methodology and method are not dealt with.
Practical implications
Recommendations are made for improving teaching and research in comparative LIS. Concepts presented here are of value to the wider LIS community, particularly in internationally oriented research and practice.
Originality/value
Since the 1980s there has been very little conceptual and methodological reflection on comparative LIS. This article alerts the LIS profession to new thinking in other comparative disciplines.
Keywords
Acknowledgements
This article is a product of on-going reflection on international and comparative librarianship. It draws upon, updates and amplifies material from two conference papers (Lor and Britz, 2010; Lor, 2012) and from the author's book, some draft chapters of which are available on the internet (Lor, n.d.).
Citation
Johan Lor, P. (2014), "Revitalizing comparative library and information science: theory and metatheory", Journal of Documentation, Vol. 70 No. 1, pp. 25-51. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-10-2012-0129
Publisher
:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2014, Emerald Group Publishing Limited