To read this content please select one of the options below:

WWH-dropout scale: when, why and how to measure propensity to drop out of undergraduate courses

Jeovani Schmitt (Department of Education, Catarinense Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology (IFC), Blumenau, Brazil)
Maria Inês Fini (Department of Educational Psychology, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil)
Cyntia Bailer (Department of Languages, Regional University of Blumenau (FURB), Blumenau, Brazil)
Rosangela Fritsch (Department of Education, University of the Rio dos Sinos Valley (UNISINOS), São Leopoldo, Brazil)
Dalton Francisco de Andrade (Department of Informatics and Statistics, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Brazil)

Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education

ISSN: 2050-7003

Article publication date: 17 August 2020

Issue publication date: 4 May 2021

478

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims at developing an instrument to measure the latent trait propensity to drop out in face-to-face higher education.

Design/methodology/approach

Based on Tinto's student integration theory, a 27-item scale was created to measure student propensity to drop out of undergraduate programs. Item response theory was used to evaluate the psychometric analysis of the items. Furthermore, different methodologies were used to evaluate and provide evidence for content validity, response process validity, internal structure validity and criterion-related validity.

Findings

With the support of specialists in the construct, the interpretation of the scores for the use of the scale was defined in four levels of propensity: high, moderate, low and very low.

Research limitations/implications

The latent trait propensity to drop out in face-to-face higher education allows the inclusion of new items and aspects in the instrument. Thus, it can be adapted to distance education.

Practical implications

The students' propensity to drop out score can be useful for researchers and administration units in colleges and universities in the planning of permanent institutional actions and programs to take preventive measures.

Social implications

Minimize dropout in order to raise the educational level of the population and make better use of the resources invested in education.

Originality/value

This study points out when, why and how propensity to drop out can be measured and how scores can be interpreted in the context of the problem.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank three anonymous reviewers for their enlightening comments on a previous version of this paper.Funding: Ministry of Education – MEC; Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel – CAPES Process 88881.133982/2016–01.

Citation

Schmitt, J., Fini, M.I., Bailer, C., Fritsch, R. and Andrade, D.F.d. (2021), "WWH-dropout scale: when, why and how to measure propensity to drop out of undergraduate courses", Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 540-560. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-01-2020-0019

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles