2013 Awards for Excellence

International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management

ISSN: 1741-0401

Article publication date: 7 January 2014

86

Citation

(2014), "2013 Awards for Excellence", International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 63 No. 1. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-01-2014-001

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited


2013 Awards for Excellence

Article Type: 2013 Awards for Excellence From: International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Volume 63, Issue 1

The following article was selected for this year's Outstanding Paper Award for
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management

"Performance appraisal based on a forced distribution system: its drawbacks and remedies"

Rachana Chattopadhayay
International Management Institute, Kolkata, India

Anil Kumar Ghosh
Theoretical Statistics and Mathematics Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, India

Purpose – Performance appraisal based on a forced distribution system (FDS) is widely used in large corporate sectors around the globe. Though many researchers have pointed out several drawbacks in FDS, due to the absence of any suitable alternative, it has been (and continues to be) adopted by many industries over a long period of time. The purpose of this paper is to point out some serious limitations of this system and propose a simple modification to overcome these limitations.
Design/methodology/approach – FDS determines the relative positions of the employees involved in similar work by comparing them against one another, and based on their performance, the employees receive different grades. Here the authors use the Likert's scaling method to convert these grades into numerical scores, then these scores are used to estimate the average performance of each group of employees, which is referred to as the group index. Taking these group indices into consideration, the authors propose a modified performance score of each employee for their final evaluation. Efficiencies of the existing FDS and the proposed modified version are compared using a simple measure of Rank correlation known as the Kendall's τ-statistic.
Findings – Extensive simulation studies show that the modified algorithm is uniformly better than the existing one over different schemes for allocations of employees to different projects, and depending on the allocation scheme, it can lead to substantial improvement.
Originality/value – This paper can be considered as the first to mathematically demonstrate the problems lying in the appraisal system based on a forced distribution and the first that provides a simple but effective solution which can be adopted by the organizations using FDS for performance appraisal.

www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/17410401211277138

This article originally appeared in Volume 61 Number 8, 2012, pp. 881-896,
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management

The following articles were selected for this year's Highly Commended Award

"Welfare service system productivity: the concept and its application"

Antti Lönnqvist and Harri Laihonen

This article originally appeared in Volume 61 Number 2, 2012,
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management

"What makes a “research star”? Factors influencing the research productivity of business faculty"

Charles S. White, Karen James, Lisa A. Burke and Richard S. Allen

This article originally appeared in Volume 61 Number 6, 2012,
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management

Factors relating to effectiveness data use in healthcare management

Outi Simonen, Elina Viitanen and Marja Blom

This article originally appeared in Volume 61 Number 7, 2012,
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management

Related articles