To read this content please select one of the options below:

Medical visit time and predictors in health facilities: a mega systematic review and meta-analysis

Sakineh Hajebrahimi (Research Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran)
Ali Janati (Iranian Center of Excellence in Health Management, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran)
Morteza Arab-Zozani (Social Determinants of Health Research Center, School of Health, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran)
Mobin Sokhanvar (Iranian Center of Excellence in Health Management, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran)
Elaheh Haghgoshayie (Clinical Research Development Unit, Shahid Beheshti Hospital, Maragheh University of Medical Sciences, Maragheh, Iran)
Yibeltal Siraneh (Department of Health Economics, Management and Policy, Faculty of Public Health, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia)
Mohammadkarim Bahadori (Health Management Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran)
Edris Hasanpoor (Research Center for Evidence-Based Health Management, Maragheh University of Medical Sciences, Maragheh, Iran)

International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare

ISSN: 2056-4902

Article publication date: 28 August 2019

Issue publication date: 25 October 2019

166

Abstract

Purpose

Visit time is a crucial aspect of patient–physician interaction; its inadequacy can negatively impact the efficiency of treatment and diagnosis. In addition, visit time is a fundamental demand of patients, and it is one of the rights of every patient. The purpose of this paper is to determine factors influencing the consultation length of physicians and to compare consultation length in different countries.

Design/methodology/approach

MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, Cochrane, ProQuest, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched. In addition, references of references were checked, and publication lists of individual scholars in the field were examined. We used data sources up to June 2018, without language restriction. We used a random-effects model for the meta-analyses. Meta-analyses were conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version (CMA) 3.0.

Findings

Of 16,911 identified studies, 189 studies were assessed of which 125 cases (67 percent) have been conducted in the USA. A total of 189 studies, 164 (86.77 percent) involved face-to face-consultations. The effects of three variables, physician gender, patient gender, and type of consultation were analyzed. According to moderate and strong evidence studies, no significant difference was found in the consultation lengths of female and male doctors (Q=42.72, df=8, I2=81.27, p=0.891) and patients’ gender (Q=55.98, df=11, I2=80.35, p=0.314). In addition, no significant difference was found in the telemedicine or face-to-face visits (Q=41.25, df=5, I2=87.88, p=0.170).

Originality/value

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, all of physicians’ visits in 34 countries were surveyed. The evidence suggests that specified variables do not influence the length of consultations. Good relationship is essential to a safe and high-quality consultation and referral process. A high-quality consultation can improve decisions and quality of visits, treatment effectiveness, efficiency of service, quality of care, patient safety and physician and patient satisfaction.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Citation

Hajebrahimi, S., Janati, A., Arab-Zozani, M., Sokhanvar, M., Haghgoshayie, E., Siraneh, Y., Bahadori, M. and Hasanpoor, E. (2019), "Medical visit time and predictors in health facilities: a mega systematic review and meta-analysis", International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare, Vol. 12 No. 5, pp. 373-402. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHRH-05-2019-0036

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles