To read this content please select one of the options below:

Evaluation of body composition: a comparison between two systems of bioelectrical impedance

Patricia Camacho Dias (Patricia Camacho Dias is Professor of Nutrition at the Faculdade de Nutrição, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Brazil.)
Gloria Valeria da Veiga (Gloria Valeria da Veiga is Professor of Nutrition at the Instituto de Nutrição, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.)
Sidney Cavalcante da Silva (Sidney Cavalcante da Silva is a Researcher at the Núcleo do Instituto de Ciências de Atividade Física, Laboratório de Fisiologia do Exercício, Comando da Aeronáutica do Brasil, Brazil.)
Walace David Monteiro (Walace David Monteirois a Researcher at the Núcleo do Instituto de Ciências de Atividade Física, Laboratório de Fisiologia do Exercício, Comando da Aeronáutica do Brasil, Brazil.)

Nutrition & Food Science

ISSN: 0034-6659

Article publication date: 1 December 2001

751

Abstract

This study compared resistance (R) and body composition obtained via the bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) leg‐to‐leg system with the arm‐to‐leg system, using underwater weighing as a standard method. The study subjects were 48 healthy men between 20‐40 years old. No difference was observed in the means of R, per cent body fat (%BF) and fat‐free mass (FFM) obtained from the two systems, but the range of individual differences was from – 70 to + 60ohms for R, from – 5 to + 7kg for FFM and – 8 to + 8 for %BF. The two systems of BIA overestimated the %BF and underestimated FFM. Concludes that LLS is an alternative to assessment of body composition in epidemiological studies. However, independent of the system, BIA is not appropriate for estimating body composition at an individual level.

Keywords

Citation

Camacho Dias, P., Valeria da Veiga, G., Cavalcante da Silva, S. and Monteiro, W.D. (2001), "Evaluation of body composition: a comparison between two systems of bioelectrical impedance", Nutrition & Food Science, Vol. 31 No. 6, pp. 304-309. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006156

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2001, MCB UP Limited

Related articles