Determinants of digital technologies adoption in government census data operations

Kingsley Ofosu-Ampong (Department of Business Technology and Innovation, Heritage Christian University College, Accra, Ghana)
Alexander Asmah (Department of Business Technology and Innovation, Heritage Christian University College, Accra, Ghana)
John Amoako Kani (Department of Informatics, Heritage Christian University College, Accra, Ghana)
Dzifa Bibi (Department of Business Technology and Innovation, Heritage Christian University College, Accra, Ghana)

Digital Transformation and Society

ISSN: 2755-0761

Article publication date: 14 June 2023

Issue publication date: 21 August 2023

1578

Abstract

Purpose

This study investigates the determinants of digital census for population and housing census (PHC) program through the lens of performance expectancy, technology readiness, self-efficacy and hedonic motivation for the upliftment of a national data collection exercise and development of human resource management.

Design/methodology/approach

A quantitative and qualitative research method was used to survey enumerators' responses from the PHC exercise during the COVID-19 period in Ghana. Based on the four determinants, a conceptual framework was developed consisting of eight proposed hypotheses tested through a structural equation model.

Findings

The findings of the study indicate that technological readiness, self-efficacy and hedonic motivation significantly influence behavioural intention to adopt digital technologies for PHC training and data collection. Importantly, the authors identified four key themes relating to digital technologies in PHC – personal enablers, general enablers, inherent affordances (inherent possibilities by the user in relation to what the technology offers in context) and personal inhibitors.

Originality/value

For research, this work systematizes antecedents from diverse research streams and validates their relative impact on government digital transformation for accurate data, thus providing a cohesive theoretical explanation of digital technologies in PHC. Due to the study's infancy in a developing country context, the findings provide a preliminary foundation and constructive insight for a digitalization plan conducive to people’s personality and technological readiness.

Keywords

Citation

Ofosu-Ampong, K., Asmah, A., Kani, J.A. and Bibi, D. (2023), "Determinants of digital technologies adoption in government census data operations", Digital Transformation and Society, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 293-315. https://doi.org/10.1108/DTS-11-2022-0056

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Kingsley Ofosu-Ampong, Alexander Asmah, John Amoako Kani and Dzifa Bibi

License

Published in Digital Transformation and Society. Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode


1. Introduction

Since the first outbreak in late 2019, the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the adoption and use of digital technologies (Favale, Soro, Trevisan, Drago, & Mellia, 2020; Ofosu-Ampong, 2021) in national activities, including training census officers for data collection exercises. Most often, developing countries relied on face-to-face training, traditional methods, and a paper-based approach in training and collecting population and housing census (PHC) data. With the technologies deployed, enumerators for the PHC enjoy a range of training resources (quizzes, milestone learning, syllabus, social learning, badges and inquiries) at an appropriate place and time convenient to the users. Recently, Ghana has been ranked (EGDI rank – 101) the first in West Africa and fifth in Africa in e-government development services. The assessment of EGDI indicates a country's strides in infrastructure and educational levels and use of information, technology and communication (ICT) to promote access and inclusion of its citizens. This clearly shows that developing economies are doing well in terms of online services provision, human capacity development for national assignments and telecommunication connectivity. In this regard, national institutions such as the statistical bodies have started taking advantage of the technological prowess to use digital services such as computer-assisted personal interviews (CAPI) to conduct Ghana’s first-ever PHC with technology at the hub.

Previous studies have reported the low acceptance and adoption rate of digital technologies in developing countries (Kanwal & Rehman, 2017). As such, deploying technology initiatives face challenges unless the users widely accept it for training and CAPI services as an alternative to the traditional training or paper-based personal interviews (PAPI) approach. In recent times, users are still hesitant to accept new technologies while others discontinue use after initial acceptance as revealed in developing countries (Riffai, Grant, & Edgar, 2012; Kanwal & Rehman, 2017). For example, Africa's digital technologies (learning) market share was valued at US$2.2bn in 2020, accounting for one of the least across the continents (Imarc Report, 2021).

Given the unpredictable and complex learning behaviours, persuading potential field officers of different backgrounds to change their attitude and accept new technology for PHC exercise is challenging, especially in a developing country context. Prior research has reported the issue as one of the most challenging factors in implementing digital technologies in developing countries (Riffai et al., 2012) and requires further investigation to unravel the essential factors that hinder user adoption and intention to use digital census.

Furthermore, recent information systems research has used a meta-analysis to integrate findings from well-established adoption and post-adoption theoretical frameworks such as the technology acceptance model (TAM) (Davis, 1989), unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) (Dwivedi, Rana, Tamilmani, & Raman, 2020), technology-organization-environment framework (TOE) and extended UTAUT2. Notwithstanding the extensive use of the adoption model to explain the use and behavioural intention, few meta-analysis-based papers exist that have integrated the concepts and results. For example, Ambalov (2018) conducted a meta-analysis on 51 studies, whereas Ofosu-Ampong and Acheampong (2022) used structural equation modeling (SEM) to examine the original model of TOE with an additional variable “technology readiness.” According to Hunter and Schmidt (2015), there are inconclusive results of studies as it fails to account for mixed results emanating from the meta-deductive analysis.

In this regard, this study includes a mixed-method analysis with a much larger sample size of 206 participants and performs recommended SEM and follows Creswell, Plano Clark, Gutmann, and Hanson (2003) approach for conducting qualitative inquiry in identifying insightful factors and outliers. This study, therefore, examines users’ first-time adoption of digital technologies (e.g. CAPI) to facilitate PHC. To achieve the objectives, our study aspires to answer the following research questions:

RQ1.

What antecedents influence and motivate enumerators’ behavioural intention toward digital technologies in conducting PHC?

RQ2.

Does combining constructs of UTAUT2 and technology readiness offers an excellent research framework in the Ghanaian context?

The study is the earliest to investigate enumerators' intentions in census exercise by identifying IT-specific factors that affect the adoption of digital technologies. The study is structured to include the following: literature review, research method and hypotheses, analysis and results, and conclusion.

2. Literature review

2.1 Use of digital census

Investigating technology acceptance and adoption has been established as a relevant aspect of the related literature on online education, such as teaching, personalized and self-regulated learning (McLoughlin & Lee, 2010). Many theories and considerations have been used to investigate and examine critical antecedents of user intention and adoption of e-learning technologies. For example, Kayali and Alaaraj (2020) found that perceived ease of use, social influence, relative advantage and user satisfaction are important predictors of technology adoption in Lebanese universities. The scholars also found a positive influence of behavioural intention on the use behaviour of cloud-based resources. Factors such as utility, usefulness, price value and enjoyment have significantly influenced users' behavioural intention and adoption (Kayali & Alaaraj, 2020; Chen, Li, Liu, Yen, & Ruangkanjanases, 2021). Prior studies have been conducted on behavioural intention and digital media from different perspectives and contexts with different conceptual frameworks. For instance, Table 1 shows studies on digital technologies deployed, the context of the study, the theoretical and methodological models and the factors that may determine digital census adoption.

In Ghana, Boateng et al. (2016) empirically investigated students' determinants of e-learning resources using SEM and found perceived usefulness and attitude as significant predictors. Conversely, computer self-efficacy and perceived ease of use were insignificant predictors. In a recent study, Mailizar, Burg, and Maulina (2021) examined how system quality, perceived ease of use, experience, attitude, and perceived usefulness predict adoption during the COVID-19 pandemic. The scholars found attitude as the most significant factor in determining students' technology adoption during the pandemic. Perceived usefulness and ease of use were less significant in predicting behavioural intention because the users had a long experience with the system and were hence conversant with the system. Further, Aboagye, Yawson, and Appiah (2021) supported the adoption challenges of digital technologies from a cultural perspective. They found that accessibility, social, academic, and lecturer issues were the predominant challenges of technology intention and adoption. Lecturer issues were also a hindrance to the intention and use of e-learning. Certainly, these studies have provided an early understanding of determinants of users' behavioural intention and adoption in developing countries. However, other important determinants such as hedonic motivation and technology readiness have received less attention and research in technology adoption.

With the wide adoption of technologies since the pandemic, it has become necessary to expand research to explore other important factors that account for the relationship between technology readiness with self-efficacy and hedonic motivation. These factors have not received much attention in prior research in developing countries. The direct relationship between attitude and behavioural intent and adoption has also been ignored in these studies. Importantly, no study has examined these factors in the context of PHC. Consequently, the motivation of this study is to fill these theoretical gaps and provide new insight into technology adoption in PHC from a developing country context. Thus, we explore the following less researched variables to explain the phenomenon of interest from a developing country's perspective on census: performance expectancy, hedonic motivation, technology readiness and self-efficacy. Lastly, the reviewed papers did not provide a detailed description of the quality of digital technologies deployment, which makes it difficult to understand the IT-specific factors that influence enumerators’ and digital census quality. Scholars have been urged to investigate information technology-related factors that are more closely linked to the context of digital technologies (Li, Dai, & Cui, 2020; Damenshie-Brown & Ofosu-Ampong, 2023). This approach may offer more precise recommendations for developing effective strategies, designs and practices (Hong, Chan, Thong, Chasalow, & Dhillon, 2014).

Moreover, in examining prior digital technologies adoption at the organizational level, as noted earlier in Table 1, we identified two drivers as the antecedents. The first driver or dimension is the enablers’ factors, a type of external or internal locus of control that motivate people to engage in counterproductive work behaviour. Thus, if the adoption of technology does not meet the performance and effort expectancy of the intended users, it may lead to counterproductive work behaviour. Venkatesh, Cheung, Davis, and Lee (2021) consider enablers as an internal propensity or external pressure that motivates work outcomes while the second driver, i.e. inhibitors, are barriers that prevent “deviant behaviour”.

The conventional research on information systems (IS) has predominantly concentrated on identifying the factors that promote technology usage (i.e. enablers) while giving less consideration to the factors that deter it (known as inhibitors). However, we believe that enablers and inhibitors are separate concepts and can exist together. Examining IT usage from both enabler and inhibitor perspectives can offer a more comprehensive understanding of this phenomenon (Cenfetelli & Schwarz, 2011).

3. Research model and hypothesis

As shown in Figure 1 are four determinants (performance expectancy, hedonic motivation, technology readiness, and self-efficacy) for predicting behaviour intentions included in the proposed conceptual model. The hedonic motivation and performance expectancy as an extension of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology was proposed to address the technology adoption from the user perspective (Venkatesh et al., 2012). Similarly, technology readiness and self-efficacy have been widely used. Extant literature shows its predictive power of analysing users' intention and adoption of emerging technologies (Kuo, Liu, & Ma, 2013; Chen et al., 2021). The next section discusses the research model and hypotheses development.

3.1 Performance expectancy

Originally, Venkatesh et al. (2012) defined PE as the extent to which individuals believe that their job performance is improved using technology. However, depending on the nature of their research, several researchers (such as Sewandono et al., 2022; Batucan et al., 2022) have explored PE from a different viewpoint concerning habitual behaviour. For this study, we define PE as the degree to which the use of digital census tools (such as CAPI) has enabled enumerators to effectively carry out their duties. As a relatively new area of study, there may not be any prior research that specifically examines the relationship between PE and digital census. However, PE has been used in other studies to establish its relationship with various technology outcomes, such as faculty research, where Sewandono et al. (2022) found that information quality, collaboration quality, and satisfaction with system use all have a positive and significant relationship with PE. Using the extended UTAUT model to explain factors affecting online technologies, Batucan et al. (2022) concluded that there was an insignificant relationship between PE and BI, but they explained that the level of interactivity the system affords and the actual enjoyment from the system can significantly influence PE. Despite their findings, this study seeks to explore the relationship between PE and digital census specifically, and the following hypothesis is proposed:

H1.

PE influences BI.

H2.

PE influences the use of digital census.

3.2 Hedonic motivation

HM refers to the happiness or pleasure from using an innovation (Venkatesh et al., 2012). Previous studies (Nguyen, Nguyen, Pham, & Misra, 2014) have found the positive influence of HM on users' behavioural intention to use digital technologies and the essential role HM plays in technology acceptance (Venkatesh et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2021). Similarly, Raman and Don (2013) found HM as a significant predictor of BI among teachers learning management systems. Prior studies have also found that HM factors such as enjoyment, excitement, playfulness and fun are influential factors in predicting users' intention to adopt e-learning services (Riffai et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2021). Also, the relationship between HM and TR has been established in the literature (Borotis, Zaharias, & Poulymenakou, 2008) to mean that users who perceive e-learning as exciting tend to be more technologically ready and competent to use e-learning services. In recent times, gamification (Ofosu-Ampong, 2020) – an act of adding game design elements to task activities to improve the hedonic value of systems is been propagated in most organizations. To this end, the study proposes the following:

H3.

HM influences BI.

H4.

HM influences TR.

3.3 Technological readiness

TR is the extent to which human capacity, technological infrastructure, and innovation support technology adoption (Wang et al., 2010). Human resource or capacity readiness is the skills and knowledge required to manage and implement e-learning services for PHC. On the other hand, the technological infrastructure is the hardware, software, and services required to manage and operate e-learning services in a national assignment. Thus, the IT skills of users and the availability of technological infrastructure and innovation products constitute TR of a PHC and may influence the adoption of e-learning (Wang et al., 2010; Oliveira & Martins, 2010). Consequently, TR is important in behavioural intention to adopt e-learning. Thus, the study proposes the following:

H5.

TR influences BI to use digital census.

3.4 Self-efficacy

SE refers to how individuals judge their capabilities to perform a task. As people will operate and manage e-learning services if adopted for data collection and training, their capability for the exercise is a factor that may influence e-learning adoption (Oliveira & Martins, 2010). Thus, several studies (Sharif & Raza, 2017) have found a positive relationship between SE and BI. Further, SE can indirectly contribute to BI by shaping the users' perception (e.g. ease of use and technology readiness) towards an innovation (Pan & Jang, 2008). According to Wang et al. (2010), users who believe in their skills and abilities to use technology are more likely to adopt such innovation. Accordingly, users may be more technologically ready if they positively perceive their self-efficacy and capability to use e-learning services appropriately. As a result, SE is critical in the use of technologies. Thus, the study proposes the following:

H6.

SE influences BI.

H7.

SE influences TR.

3.5 Behavioural intention

BI is “a cognitive process of individuals' readiness to perform specific behaviour and is an immediate antecedent of usage behaviour” (Abbasi, Chandio, Soomro, & Shah, 2011). Prior studies have found BI as an essential determinant of technology acceptance and success of a system and a decisive drive of actual use behaviour (Tarhini, Hone, & Liu, 2014; Alalwan, Dwivedi, & Rana, 2017). Thus:

H8.

BI influences the use of digital census.

3.6 Methodology

The protocol for this study was reviewed by the District Census Office of the Kwaebibirem Municipal Assembly of Ghana. A mixed research method was used for this exploratory study to include a survey questionnaire and interviews.

The purpose of the study is to investigate the determinants of behavioural intention and adoption of digital technologies in census. This is the first time Ghana is employing DT in PHC, hence the issues of technology acceptance or rejection may be diverse and not clear-cut. To ensure reliability and validity of the survey instruments and importantly collect quality data, the study followed Churchill (1979) approach used for designing the questionnaire. The works of Compeau and Higgins (1995), Parasuraman (2000) and Venkatesh et al. (2012) informed the item selections for SE, TR, PE and HM. Table 2 provides a conceptualization of the constructs used in this study. The target population are enumerators recruited by the Ghana Statistical Service to partake in the PHC which is conducted every 10 years. A convenience sampling technique was adopted to make use of readily available enumerators after the fieldwork. The researchers were added to the WhatsApp platform created for the enumerators. In all, two WhatsApp platforms were created with each consisting of 170 members. Formal consent was sought from the participants and our objective for the study was made known to them. Since the researchers were in the field, most participants wanted to fill out the questionnaire via paper-based, so their phone numbers were collected on the platform for face-to-face data collection. Others preferred the online questionnaire due which was the most convenient. This approach to collecting data is deemed best due to COVID-19 protocols. The paper-based and online data collection was carried out from June to July 2022 in the Eastern part of Ghana (Koforidua and Kade). A total of 216 respondents were obtained, and 206 were useable, i.e. 10 invalid responses. The study used a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from strongly agree (1) to strongly disagree (5). Structural equation modeling (SEM) using SPSS and SmartPLS was used in analysing the data.

4. Results

4.1 Descriptive statistics

Out of the 206 participants, 54.4% were male, while 45.6% were females. The ages of the respondents ranged from 22 to 67, with a mean age of 38.5. Majority of the participants were senior high school and diploma holders (46.8%), bachelor’s degree holders (32.3%), senior high certificates (17.7%) and master's degrees (3.2%). Further, 41.7% of the enumerators were unemployed, 10.4% were teachers, 10.4 were health workers and 6.3 were retired. Ghana has a relatively high unemployment rate as supported by our data. According to the Ghana Statistical Service's Labor Force Survey Report for 2019, the unemployment rate was 7.3%. However, it is worth noting that the youth unemployment rate is much higher than the overall rate, with 13.8% of young people aged 15–24 unemployed. Despite efforts to create jobs and reduce unemployment, it remains a significant challenge for the country. Interestingly, out of the 206 enumerators, only 64 (31.1%) own a tablet. In contrast, 142 (68.9%) have used a tablet before but do not own one. Table 3 shows the demographic characteristic of the respondents.

Furthermore, most of the participants were at the beginner’s stage of using data collection software; on the contrary, majority of the enumerators (67.5%) have intermediate experience with tablet and ICT knowledge. Consequently, intermediate and advanced knowledge and experience with ICT and tablets do not necessarily equate to experience in data collection software.

4.2 Quantitative inquiry

There are two parts to the results. The first part of the results (i.e. quantitative analysis) is in two folds. The first is the measurement model validation, where the variables of the psychometric properties were examined. The second is the structural model assessment where collinearity issues, predictive relevance and the relationship between the constructs were examined.

4.3 Assessment of measurement model

To evaluate the measurement model, we examine the reliability, convergent validity and discriminant validity. The study followed three steps (Fornell & Larcker, 1981). First, all the item loadings must be above 0.6. Second, the composite reliabilities (CR) should be higher than 0.8. Finally, the average variance extracted (AVE) must be above 0.5. As shown in Table 1, the analysis of the results confirms that all the item loadings were higher than the 0.6 thresholds. Also, as indicated in Table 4, the CR values were equal to or higher than 0.850 except for PE (0.809), and the AVE value was between 0.592 and 0.769. This implies that convergent is fulfilled.

The reliabilities of the latent variables were assessed using the CR and AVE with values above 0.8 and 0.5, respectively. As shown in Table 4, the reliability of CR and AVE is acceptable and confirms the measurement model's reliability. The discriminant validity is assessed using the Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio of correlation (HTMT). HTMT values equal to or less than 0.9 indicate discriminant validity is established. As shown in Table 5, all the values were below 0.9 except HM and behavioural intention which equalled the 0.9 thresholds, however, remain unaffected because the threshold is 0.9 and below. Consequently, the measurement items indicate the model fitness of the proposed research. It is important to establish the fact that there is evidence of an estimated correlation between measures as some values are close to 0.9 in Table 5 (Bagozzi & Phillips, 1982).

4.4 Assessment of structural model

The structural model in an SEM specifies the hypothesized relationships among the latent variables, and also the relationships between the latent and observed variables. The structural model and hypothesis are analysed based on the calculated values of the path coefficient and t-values. The R2 indicates the model's predictive capabilities. The strength of the R2 for BI of digital census usage (dependent variable) indicates that three independent variables (i.e. HM, TR, SE) explain 73.8% of intention to use. At the same time, BI accounted for 68.2% of the actual use of digital census variance. Multi-collinearity issue is also assessed using the VIF statistics. VIF values less than 5 indicate no collinearity issue (Hair, Sarstedt, Hopkins, & Kuppelwieser, 2014). As shown in Table 6, all the values ranged from 1.062 to 2.683 implying that the issue of multi-collinearity was not present.

The statistical significance of the propositions is achieved using the bootstrap resampling method (Henseler, Ringle, & Sarstedt, 2015). Table 7 illustrates the support of the hypothetical path of the adapted model. Out of the eight hypotheses, H1, H3, H4, H5, H6 and H8 indicate a strong positive effect, while H2 and H7 are not supported. Consequently, HM (t-value = 3.475), technological readiness (t-value = 4.090) and SE (t-value = 2.210) show a positive effect on enumerators' intention of digital census usage. Enumerators' behavioural intention (t-value = 25.285) also shows a positive effect on the digital census in PHC.

Moreover, PE (t-value = 2.899) affected participants’ behavioural intention to use and use digital census (t-value = 3.582). The result of HM on TR is t-value = 9.731. The results support the hypothesis and thus HM positively impacts TR to adopt digital technologies in PHC. On the other hand, self-efficacy had no positive effect on TR (t-value = 0.013) of enumerators BI to adopt. The final findings of the SmartPLS analysis are shown in Figure 2.

Additionally, we estimated the goodness of fit indices using standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) and normed fit index (NFI). The SRMR measures the approximate fit index, and its acceptable range is between 0 and 0.08 with a comparative fit index (CFI) > 0.95 (Hu & Bentler, 1998). The NFI which shows the incremental fit indices indicates that the closer the NFI value to 1, the better the fit (Hu & Bentler, 1998). Table 8 shows the CFI, SRMR and NFI values of the model fit. The SRMR value (0.081) was slightly higher than the 0.08 threshold. This can occur if there is missing data; however, SRMR ≤.09 may still be indicative of an acceptable fit (Little, 2013). This study assumed a 95% confidence interval, with a minimum critical value of 1.65 for a significance level of 10% (two-tailed). The estimated model in the SEM represents the statistical findings and results based on the observed data, which provides insights into the structure and relationships of the variables under analysis in this research.

4.5 Qualitative inquiry

The second part is the results from the interview held with the enumerators on the digital census to respond to the call for incorporating particular variables necessary for the uptake of technologies in the census. IT-specific constructs are rarely found in prior PHC studies. The interview on the digital census was to map out specific IT variables and sub-constructs relevant to technology adoption. This helps to broaden the UTAUT model inadequacy and explain the phenomenon of interest (see Table 9). As an explanation of the observed phenomenon and a guiding theory (UTAUT) in this study, our sub-constructs are contextually developed from the interview and should serve as a contribution to the theory in describing the main tenants. The digital census was found to be effective and empowered enumerators to accomplish training and data collection activities in a reduced time. The qualitative data were collected at roughly the same time as the quantitative data. This implies that the same respondents were selected for the quantitative and qualitative for easy convergence and thematic trend of analysis. Selecting different respondents would have introduced personal characteristics that might confound the measures and results.

In essence, this study followed Creswell et al. (2003) approach to conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Following Creswell et al. (2003), we derived the first-order codes, second-order themes and aggregated dimensions (Gioia, Corley, & Hamilton, 2013). The classification is based on a data structure that groups first and second-order themes within the three aggregate dimensions of personal enablers, inherent affordance, general enablers and personal inhibitors (Figure 3). This was to allow the researchers to gather additional data to understand the phenomenon and help resolve technology adoption contradictions. After the data analysis, the team concluded that digital technology adoption can be grouped into different user types. We, therefore, turned to the qualitative data, where we highlighted four qualitative themes and re-examined their quantitative occurring indicators for support for the themes. The new information led to further analysis of the literature, in which we found sub-constructs confirmation for the new findings. As shown in Table 9, the quantitative data were collected first, and the results of the technology acceptance (UTAUT2) factors informed the qualitative form of data collection, analysis and insight. The occurring themes show a summary and highlight the interview responses. Accordingly, we summarized their responses by first giving sub-constructs and eventually the four core themes. These sub-constructs, to be measured directly or indirectly by those occurring themes, can be used in studies of a similar kind in the future.

We identified 13 sub-constructs and several occurring themes on the use and intent-to-use digital census in a developing country. Regarding performance expectancy, three constructs were identified namely job fit and perceived usefulness, perceived behavioural control and outcome expectation of digital census. Some of the recurring themes include social support and try-out opportunities, persistence use boost confidence and digital literacy as a primary factor in technology adoption. Hedonic motivation revealed three constructs while technology readiness showed four constructs. Regarding self-efficacy, three constructs namely complexity, perceived ability and optimism were identified. These constructs allowed us to explore further the occurring themes as shown in Table 9.

Importantly, we identified four key themes relating to digital technologies in PHC – personal enablers, inherent affordances, general enablers and personal inhibitors. These themes are distinctive to digital innovation at the national level and could form a conceptual initiative that allows for connections between national initiative, regional acceptance and district-level implementation of digital technologies. Thus, we found that during a pandemic, the human resource management of technology for a national assignment may exhibit these four personality traits and future studies may examine technology use in these dimensions.

5. Discussion

Looking at users' behavioural intention and adoption of technologies, this study presents a significant contribution to existing knowledge regarding digital technologies for PHC training and data collection. Certainly, the study provides practitioners and researchers with an understanding of key determinants and aspects of integrating technology to collect information from over 30 million population. The study extends previous constructs on technology adoption and goes beyond proposed studies examined by considering new constructs (HM), including SE and TR. It further investigates the causal path between BI and the use of digital census. From the analysis, the proposed model successfully predicted 73.8% of the variance in BI. This large portion of variance is close to Venkatesh et al.'s (2012) predictive value of 74%. Consequently, this shows how solid the conceptual model predicts the field officers' intention and adoption of digital technology in the era of COVID-19. The study also found four key themes necessary for understanding digital technologies adoption. They include personal enablers – the degree to which an enumerator has a favourable evaluation of digital census; inherent affordance – these are inherent possibilities by the user in relation to what the technology offers in context; while general enablers focus on the organizational capacity to initiate digital technologies to affect the traditional business operation and produce transformational change. The last theme is personal inhibitors which refer to enumerators' propensity to try innovations or technologies, notwithstanding the technological challenges.

Empirically, the relationship between HM and BI and TR is the most significant. This means that enumerators in the PHC fancy excitement and fun in using DT and are more motivated to train and collect effective census data with technology such as CAPI. These results are consistent with prior studies (Riffai et al., 2012; Venkatesh et al., 2012; Farooq et al., 2017). Accordingly, the national statistical units should promote more data collection technologies and continue developing enumerators' skills and experience to use DT effectively in subsequent PHCs. As the results revealed that SE positively affects BI, conducting PHC training for field officers will enhance their self-efficacy and intention to use DT (Compeau & Higgins, 1995).

In most developing countries, using digital means such as tablets for training and data collection represents an added value in terms of innovation, improvement, and modernization. Hence, this approach contributes to the intrinsic motivation of users to effectively collect quality data for projection and resource allocations. Riffai et al. (2012) found the essential function of intrinsic motivation in predicting behaviour intention. This study finds similarities in a developing country context. TR is the second strongest factor predicting BI, indicating that in conditions of a high level of TR, enumerators will have a stronger reason to adopt digital technologies. In this regard, enumerators with high TR will achieve a higher productivity benefit and stronger training intention with the technology. Further, HM positively influences TR, whereas SE negatively influences TR.

Finally, SE was found to influence BI positively. The result of this finding is consistent with prior studies (Zhou, 2012; Alalwan et al., 2017). This implies that field officers capable of using technologies for training and data collection are more likely and motivated to use the technology for PHC and in the future. Accordingly, enhancing the enumerators' self-efficacy – skills and experience will result in the intention to use digital technologies (Compeau & Higgins, 1995) and ultimately collect quality data. Further, users with high innovativeness have a better understanding. Thus, they are more willing to learn and use new technologies and become familiar operators of the product than users with less drive for innovativeness (Massey, Khatri, & Montoya-Weiss, 2007).

5.1 Theoretical implications

This article makes a valuable contribution to the IS literature by addressing the gaps that exist in digital census research. Specifically, we identified and organized the antecedents of the digital census, which is a significant contribution to the literature and theory building. We utilized a literature-based approach to synthesize four theoretical construct perspectives (guided by the UTAUT2), namely performance expectancy, hedonic motivation, technology readiness and self-efficacy, into a comprehensive model. This approach provides a unified and cohesive explanation of the digital census, which is in line with calls from IS scholars to create unified models that synthesize diverse theories and models. This paper's contribution aligns with previous research by Ofosu-Ampong and Acheampong (2022) and Venkatesh et al. (2012) that advocate for a unified approach to advance the IS field. This study is one of the initial research to evaluate the acceptance and use of digital census among enumerators in a developing country, particularly after the outbreak of COVID-19, using a distinctive research model. Our model also allowed for the exploration of second-order themes and aggregated dimensions of the qualitative inquiry, such as Job fit and perceived usefulness, compatibility, innovativeness, perceived ability and optimism.

5.2 Practical implications

Practically, as national assignments increasingly rely on digital technologies for operations, our work confirms that personal enablers, general enablers, inherent affordances and personal inhibitors can significantly affect work activities and performance. Thus, directors or managers must pay attention to job fit, perceived usefulness, relative advantage, innovativeness and perceived behavioural control of employees for short-term contracts. By uncovering the four core themes on the use of digital census for national assignment, we offer countries planning on census and population exercises insights on how to tailor technologies to provide accurate data for national projections. Also, given the importance of readiness in such a huge task, managers must deploy the technologies and training of required staff earlier to the district and regional zones. This will help in paying close attention to high-priority areas with less technology readiness and extraversion – as their engagement with non-work digital technologies use is likely to be high.

6. Conclusion

This study contributes to the understanding of behavioural intention and adoption of digital technologies for PHC training and data collection. It highlights the key determinants and aspects of integrating technology to collect information from over 30 million populations. The study uses new constructs such as HM, SE and TR to extend previous constructs on technology adoption. From the analysis, the proposed model predicts the field officers' intention and adoption of digital technology. The study also identifies four key themes necessary for understanding digital technologies adoption. These include personal enablers, inherent affordances, general enablers and personal inhibitors.

The study finds that HM and TR are the most significant factors predicting BI, indicating that enumerators in the PHC fancy excitement and fun in using DT and are more motivated to train and collect effective census data with technology such as CAPI. The study recommends that the national statistical units should promote more data collection technologies and continue developing enumerators' skills and experience to use DT effectively in subsequent PHC.

SE is found to influence BI positively, implying that field officers capable of using technologies for training and data collection are more likely and motivated to use the technology for PHC and in the future. Practically, the study recommends that directors or managers pay attention to job fit and perceived usefulness, relative advantage, innovativeness and perceived behavioural control of employees for short-term contracts.

7. Limitations and future research

The suggested future research directions can contribute to addressing the limitations of the current study and expanding the knowledge in the field of digital census adoption in developing countries. Conducting studies in other developing countries can increase the generalizability of the findings and provide insights into the similarities and differences in the adoption of digital census technologies in different contexts.

In addition, using qualitative research methods can complement the quantitative findings and provide a more in-depth understanding of the determinants of digital census adoption in developing countries. Qualitative studies can help identify additional factors that may not have been captured in the quantitative approach and explore the nuances and complexities of the adoption process.

Furthermore, examining the impact of demographic differences on the independent variables of use intention can enhance the understanding of how digital census technologies are perceived and adopted in developing countries. This can help inform targeted interventions and policies that address the specific needs and preferences of different demographic groups.

Overall, these future research directions can contribute to advancing the knowledge and understanding of digital census adoption in developing countries, which can have important implications for improving census data collection and management processes.

Figures

Research model of digital census adoption for PHC

Figure 1

Research model of digital census adoption for PHC

SmartPLS analysis results

Figure 2

SmartPLS analysis results

Overview of data structure

Figure 3

Overview of data structure

Selected studies on digital technologies adoption

AuthorsTheoryCountryMethodologySome adoption factors
Namisiko, Munialo, and Nyongesa (2014)Technology acceptance model and Technology, organization and environmentKenyaQuestionnaire distributed to 500 participants
Inferential statistics
Technology infrastructure
Perceived usefulness
Competitive pressure
Boateng, Mbrokoh, Boateng, Senyo, and Ansong (2016)TAMGhanaSurveyed 339 participants
Structural equation model
Self-efficacy Attitude
Perceived usefulness
Perceived ease of use
Attitude
Alhabeeb and Rowley (2018)N/ASaudi ArabiaQuestionnaire distributed to academic staff (230) and students (306)
Principal component analysis
Technology infrastructure
Ease of access
Student characteristics
Support and training
Instructor characteristics
Yakubu and Dasuki (2019)Unified theory of acceptance of use of technologyNigeriaSurvey 286 participants
Structural equation model
Performance expectancy
Effort expectancy
Kayali and Alaaraj (2020)TAM
UTAUT
Diffusion of innovation
LebanonQuestionnaire completed by 422 participants from three universities
Smart partial least square
Relative advantage
Ease of use
Social influence
User satisfaction
Chen et al. (2021)UTAUT2TaiwanOnline questionnaire distributed to 260 participants
Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)
Price value
Technological readiness
Performance expectancy
Facilitating conditions
Drivers of digital technologies in government and organizational improvement
Related papersDescriptionDrivers identified
Wimelius, Mathiassen, Holmström, and Keil (2021), Wang, Chen, and Xie (2010), Zhu, Dong, Xu, and Kraemer (2006), Gong, Yang, and Shi (2020), Hafseld, Hussein and Rauzy (2021) and Ofosu-Ampong (2023)Many government agencies and organizations are utilizing digital technology to enhance business processes and operational performance. For instance, RFID-based technologies are commonly used to transfer data, and mainly to track and identify objects and people to manage the growing complexity of data. Equipment manufacturers employ digital technologies to enable rescheduling, while service managers implement big data analysis to enhance process visibility and transparency, agility and integration
While many governments have launched digital transformation initiatives, there is still a lack of understanding about the factors that contribute to their success
Enablers
(triggers that can provoke digital technologies adoption and use)
Kane (2019), Bharadwaj, El Sawy, Pavlou, and Venkatraman (2013), Ofosu-Ampong (2021), Tangi, Janssen, Benedetti, and Noci (2021) and Simmonds, Gazley, Kaartemo, Renton, and Hooper (2021)Government institutions are increasingly offering digitalized products and services to better meet market demands and manage customer relationships. In addition to enhancing customer satisfaction, digital solutions can also serve as a powerful government marketing tool, projecting a positive government image as being innovative and digitally savvy. However, the inhabitants may be resistant (inhibitors) to government digital transformation and may impede progress
Moreover, digital solutions have the potential to substantially reduce census costs when compared to traditional approaches (paper-based). As a result, many government institutions are striving to adopt the latest digital technologies in order to keep up with digital frontrunners. Organizations that do not follow this trend risk falling behind their competitors
Inhibitors
(barriers to digital technologies use and engagement)

Source(s): Indicate by authors

Conceptualisation of the constructs

FactorsItemSources
Performance expectancyThe use of digital technologies would enhance job performanceModified (Alalwan et al., 2017)
The degree to which new technologies are perceived as better than previous innovation
Digital technologies are useful in daily transactions and involve personal consequences of the behaviour
Hedonic motivationUsing the digital census is fun with good designModified (Venkatesh et al., 2012)
Using the digital census is entertaining and relaxing for learning and data collection
The badges and game elements were fun and engaging
Self-efficacyMy interaction with the digital census is good and easy to use
I think using digital census meets my skills and competences
Modified (Compeau & Higgins, 1995)
Technology readinessDigital census contributes to quality data and gives me more freedom of mobilityModified (Wang et al., 2010; Oliveira & Martins, 2010)
The training was adequate and gives me more control
I think the digital census was not designed for use by ordinary people
Behavioural intentionI intend to continue using digital census in the future for training and data collection
I will always opt for a digital census for data collection than paper-based
Modified (Venkatesh et al., 2012)
Use behaviourKindly indicate your usage frequency for the following digital census features:
Tablets
E-learning
Location
Modified (Oliveira, Alhinho, Rita, & Dhillon, 2017)

Source(s): Indicate by authors

Demographic characteristics

CharacteristicsN%
GenderMale11254.4
Female9445.6
Age22–327436.9
33–438943.2
44–543115.0
55–67104.9
Educational levelSenior High/Diploma10952.9
Bachelor’s degree7235.0
Master’s degree or above2512.1
Experience with Tablet/ICT knowledgeBeginners3014.6
Intermediate13967.5
Advanced6833.0
Profession of enumeratorsTrained teachers4823.3
Retired (e.g. educationists)136.3
University students104.9
Unemployed8641.7
Traders73.4
Health personnel4220.4
Data collection software used by enumeratorsBeginners13364.6
Intermediate6129.6
Advanced125.8

Source(s): Indicate by authors

Construct reliability and validity

ConstructsLabelLoadingsCronbach’s alpharho_ACRAVE
Digital Census AdoptionDCA10.8610.7600.7870.8600.674
DCA20.848
DCA30.746
Behavioural IntentionBI10.8650.8130.7840.8610.675
BI20.882
BI30.704
Performance ExpectancyPE10.7660.6960.8000.8090.592
PE20.910
PE30.607
Hedonic MotivationHM10.8600.7320.7580.8500.656
HM20.876
HM30.679
Self-efficacySE10.8800.7010.7030.8700.769
SE20.874
Technology ReadinessTR10.7500.7690.8220.8640.681
TR20.893
TR30.826

Source(s): Indicate by authors

Discriminant validity - HTMT

AdoptionBehavioural intentionPerformance
Expectancy
Hedonic motivationSelf-efficacyTechnology readiness
Adoption
Behavioural Intention0.891
Performance Expectancy0.1150.355
Hedonic Motivation0.8970.9000.223
Self-efficacy0.8100.8240.2780.767
Technology Readiness0.7120.8810.3050.8010.539

Source(s): Indicate by authors

Collinearity statistics (VIF)

AdoptionBehavioural intentionPEHedonic motivationSelf-efficacyTechnology readiness
Adoption
Behavioural Intention1.062
Performance Expectancy1.0621.048
Hedonic Motivation 2.683 1.476
Self-efficacy 1.477 1.476
Technology Readiness 2.267

Source(s): Indicate by authors

Hypothesis confirmation and effect size

PathPath coefficientSEf2t valueSupport
Performance Expectancy → Behavioural Intention0.1000.0830.1372.899H1: Supported
Performance Expectancy → E-Learning Adoption−0.1300.0780.1500.358H2: Not supported
Hedonic Motivation →Behavioural Intention0.4090.1180.2383.475H3: Supported
Hedonic Motivation →Technological Readiness0.7390.0760.8139.713H4: Supported
Technological Readiness → Behavioural Intention0.3340.0820.1884.090H5: Supported
Self-efficacy → Behavioural Intention0.2260.1020.1332.210H6: Supported
Self-efficacy →Technological Readiness−0.0010.0880.000.013H7: Not supported
Behavioural Intention → Digital Census Adoption0.8470.0342.12425.285H8: Supported

Source(s): Indicate by authors

Model fit

Structural modelEstimated model
CFI0.9100.952
SRMR0.0670.081
NFI0.7910.889

Source(s): Indicate by authors

Use of digital census: qualitative inquiry and thematic analysis (n = 10) on IT-specific variables

UTAUT2/Technology acceptance factors (first-order codes)Sub-construct
(second-order themes)
Occurring themes (exposition)
(use and intent-to-use the digital census was influenced by….)
Four core identified themes (aggregated dimensions)
Performance expectancyJob fit and perceived usefulnessAccurate data emanating from digital census
  • More accurate and reliable than the paper-based approach

Direct assistance from supervisors and district census officer and monitoring team
Reduced time to complete tasks – improved efficiency compared to the previous census
Personal enablers
The attitude towards technologies in PHC – thus, the degree to which an enumerator has a favourable evaluation of digital census
Perceived behavioural controlSocial support and try-out opportunities
Digital literacy
Persistent use boost confidence
Outcome expectations/enablersSafety of use and privacy control of devices
Increased self-esteem of enumerators
Hedonic motivationIntrinsic motivationPride partaking in the digital censusInherent affordances
These are inherent possibilities by the user in relation to what the technology offers in context. Hence the affordance may emanate from digital, institutional or social
Relative advantageHousehold benefits: reduced time in counting, convenience, accessible
Counting accuracy: more accurate and prompt errors
Reduce the time to complete a household
Device portability
Extrinsic motivationIncrease trust with data and information from households (enumerators were mostly recruited from the zonal communities)
Cases of census are resolved quickly due to the familiarity of enumerators
Census participation incentives
Technology readinessPerceived ease of useEasy to use due to prior experience with technologies
Training was not sufficient and prior experience with technology is key to digital census success
Recognized first-time challenges but adapted with time
Ease of work due to “all-in-one” census data and device
General enablers
Focus on the organizational capacity to initiate digital technologies to affect traditional business operations and produce transformational change (sometimes through hybrid)
CompatibilityTechnologies and manuals were intended for the census program and officers
According to (Ofosu-Ampong & Acheampong, 2022) compatibility plays a critical role when an organisation evaluates new technologies to see if there is an overlap with the perceived ease of use and usefulness of technologies as experienced in the past
  • Familiarity and compatibility with social lifestyle and reliability

  • Organizational readiness and top management support

  • Market Dynamics and competitive pressure for conducting population census

OptimismGenerally have a positive view of technology
  • Offers increased control, flexibility and efficiency in digital census

  • Increased efforts to attain desired goals and outcomes of the census

  • Business model readiness and government support

InnovativenessKeen to adopt new technologies
  • Willing to operate as key change agents to facilitate digital census

Challenge: some expressed discomfort/insecurity towards the technology that emanates from general scepticism towards the ability of digital census to work appropriately
Self-efficacyComplexityThe majority were early adopters of the digital census, especially the software for collecting the data
Ease in performance of the task (data collection)
Confidence with time; Data security
Personal inhibitors
Refers to enumerators' propensity to try innovations or technologies, notwithstanding the technological challenges. Hence, have a high sense of openness, flexibility and optimism
Perceived abilityEfficacy belief – perceived skills, competence and characteristics with the digital census (perceived benefit)
Optimism/opennessEnumerators perceived the digital census as more competent in training than on the field for data collection

Source(s): Indicate by authors

References

Abbasi, M. S., Chandio, F. H., Soomro, A. F., & Shah, F. (2011). Social influence, voluntariness, experience and the internet acceptance: An extension of technology acceptance model within a South‐Asian country context. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 24(1), 3052.

Aboagye, E., Yawson, J. A., & Appiah, K. N. (2021). COVID-19 and E-learning: The challenges of students in tertiary institutions. Social Education Research, 2(1), 18.

Alalwan, A. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Rana, N. P. (2017). Factors influencing adoption of mobile banking by Jordanian bank customers: Extending UTAUT2 with trust. International Journal of Information Management, 37(3), 99110.

Alhabeeb, A., & Rowley, J. (2018). E-learning critical success factors: Comparing perspectives from academic staff and students. Computers & Education, 127, 112.

Ambalov, I. A. (2018). A meta-analysis of IT continuance: An evaluation of the expectation-confirmation model. Telematics and Informatics, 35(6), 15611571.

Bagozzi, R. P., & Phillips, L. W. (1982). Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(3), 459489.

Batucan, G. B., Gonzales, G. G., Balbuena, M. G., Pasaol, K. R. B., Seno, D. N., Gonzales, R. R. (2022). An extended UTAUT model to explain factors affecting online learning system amidst COVID-19 pandemic: The case of a developing economy. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 5, 768831. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.768831. PMID: 35573898; PMCID: PMC9096242.

Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. V. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471482.

Boateng, R., Mbrokoh, A. S., Boateng, L., Senyo, P. K., & Ansong, E. (2016). Determinants of e-learning adoption among students of developing countries. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 33(4), 248262.

Borotis, S., Zaharias, P., & Poulymenakou, A. (2008). Critical success factors for e-learning adoption. In Handbook of Research on Instructional Systems and Technology (pp. 498513). IGI Global.

Cenfetelli, R. T., & Schwarz, A. (2011). Identifying and testing the inhibitors of technology usage intentions. Information Systems Research, 22(4), 808823.

Chen, S. C., Li, S. H., Liu, S. C., Yen, D. C., & Ruangkanjanases, A. (2021). Assessing determinants of continuance intention towards personal cloud services: Extending UTAUT2 with technology readiness. Symmetry, 13(3), 467.

Churchill, G. A. Jr. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 6473.

Compeau, D., & Higgins, C. (1995). Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 118143.

Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M., & Hanson, W. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 209240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Damenshie-Brown, A., & Ofosu-Ampong, K. (2023). COVID-19 pandemic and digital banking trends: managerial perspective on challenges and opportunities. In Societal transformations and resilience in times of crisis. IGI Global.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319340.

Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Tamilmani, K., & Raman, R. (2020). A meta-analysis based modified unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (meta-UTAUT): A review of emerging literature. Current Opinion in Psychology, 36, 1318.

Farooq, M. S., Salam, M., Jaafar, N., Fayolle, A., Ayupp, K., Radovic-Markovic, M., & Sajid, A. (2017). Acceptance and use of lecture capture system (LCS) in executive business studies: Extending UTAUT2. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 14(4), 329348.

Favale, T., Soro, F., Trevisan, M., Drago, I., & Mellia, M. (2020). Campus traffic and e-Learning during COVID-19 pandemic. Computer Networks, 176, 107290.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 3950.

Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 1531.

Gong, Y., Yang, J., & Shi, X. (2020). Towards a comprehensive understanding of digital transformation in government: Analysis of flexibility and enterprise architecture. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101487.

Hafseld, K. H., Hussein, B., & Rauzy, A. B. (2021). An attempt to understand complexity in a government digital transformation project. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 9(3), 7091.

Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structuralequation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106121.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1).

Hong, W., Chan, F. K., Thong, J. Y., Chasalow, L. C., & Dhillon, G. (2014). A framework and guidelines for context-specific theorizing in information systems research. Information Systems Research, 25(1), 111136.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to Underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424453.

Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Imarc Report (2021). Africa E-learning market: Industry trends, share, size, growth, opportunity and forecast 2021-2026. Available from: https://www.imarcgroup.com/africa-e-learning-mark et (accessed on 13th October 2021).

Kane, G. (2019). The technology fallacy: People are the real key to digital transformation. Research-Technology Management, 62(6), 4449.

Kanwal, F., & Rehman, M. (2017). Factors affecting e-learning adoption in developing countries–empirical evidence from Pakistan's higher education sector. IEEE Access, 5, 1096810978.

Kayali, M., & Alaaraj, S. (2020). Adoption of cloud based E-learning in developing countries: A combination A of DOI, TAM and UTAUT. International Journal of Contemporary Management and Information Technology, 1(1), 17.

Kuo, K. M., Liu, C. F., & Ma, C. C. (2013). An investigation of the effect of nurses' technology readiness on the acceptance of mobile electronic medical record systems. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13(1), 114.

Li, Y., Dai, J., & Cui, L. (2020). The impact of digital technologies on economic and environmental performance in the context of industry 4.0: A moderated mediation model. International Journal of Production Economics, 229, 107777.

Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. NY: Guilford Press.

Mailizar, M., Burg, D., & Maulina, S. (2021). Examining university students’ behavioural intention to use e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: An extended TAM model. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 70577077.

Massey, A. P., Khatri, V., & Montoya‐Weiss, M. M. (2007). Usability of online services: The role of technology readiness and context. Decision Sciences, 38(2), 277308.

McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2010). Personalised and self-regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1).

Namisiko, P., Munialo, C., & Nyongesa, S. (2014). Towards an optimisation framework for e-learning in developing countries: A case of private universities in Kenya. Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 2(2), 131148.

Nguyen, T. D., Nguyen, T. M., Pham, Q. T., & Misra, S. (2014). Acceptance and use of e-learning based on cloud computing: The role of consumer innovativeness. International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications (pp. 159174) Cham: Springer.

Ofosu-Ampong, K. (2020). The shift to gamification in education: A review on dominant issues. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 113137.

Ofosu-Ampong, K. (2021). Determinants, barriers and strategies of digital transformation adoption in a developing country Covid-19 era. Journal of Digital Science, 3(2), 6783.

Ofosu-Ampong, K. (2023). Advances in sustainable technologies’ adoption: A research agenda for smart grid. SDGs in Africa and the Middle East Region. Implementing the UN Sustainable Development Goals – Regional Perspectives. Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-91260-4_46-1.

Ofosu-Ampong, K., & Acheampong, B. (2022). Adoption of contactless technologies for remote work in Ghana post-Covid-19: Insights from technology-organisation-environment framework. Digital Business, 2(2), 100023.

Oliveira, T., Alhinho, M., Rita, P., & Dhillon, G. (2017). Modelling and testing consumer trust dimensions in E-commerce. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 153164.

Oliveira, T., & Martins, M. F. (2010). Understanding e‐business adoption across industries in European countries. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 110(9), 13371354.

Pan, M. J., & Jang, W. Y. (2008). Determinants of the adoption of enterprise resource planning within the technology-organization-environment framework: Taiwan’s communications industry. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(3), 94102.

Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology Readiness Index (TRI) a multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 307320.

Raman, A., & Don, Y. (2013). Preservice teachers' acceptance of learning management software: An application of the UTAUT2 model. International Education Studies, 6(7), 157164.

Riffai, M. M. M. A., Grant, K., & Edgar, D. (2012). Big TAM in Oman: Exploring the promise of online banking, its adoption by customers and the challenges of banking in Oman. International Journal of Information Management, 32(3), 239250.

Sewandono, R. E., Thoyib, A., Hadiwidjojo, D., & Rofiq, A. (2022). Performance expectancy of E-learning on higher institutions of education under uncertain conditions: Indonesia context. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 40414068. doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11074-9.

Sharif, A., & Raza, S.A. (2017). The influence of hedonic motivation, self-efficacy, trust and habit on adoption of internet banking: A case of developing country. International Journal of Electronic Customer Relationship Management, 11(1), 122.

Simmonds, H., Gazley, A., Kaartemo, V., Renton, M., & Hooper, V. (2021). Mechanisms of service ecosystem emergence: Exploring the case of public sector digital transformation. Journal of Business Research, 137, 100115.

Tangi, L., Janssen, M., Benedetti, M., & Noci, G. (2021). Digital government transformation: A structural equation modelling analysis of driving and impeding factors. International Journal of Information Management, 60, 102356.

Tarhini, A., Hone, K., & Liu, X. (2014). The effects of individual differences on e-learning users' behaviour in developing countries: A structural equation model. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 153163. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.020.

Venkatesh, V., Cheung, C. M. K., Davis, F. D., & Lee, Z. W. Y. (2021). Cyberslacking in the workplace: Antecedents and effects on job performance. MIS Quarterly, 47(1), 281316.

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157178.

Wang, H., Chen, S., & Xie, Y. (2010). An RFID-based digital warehouse management system in the tobacco industry: A case study. International Journal of Production Research, 48(9), 25132548.

Wimelius, H., Mathiassen, L., Holmström, J., & Keil, M. (2021). A paradoxical perspective on technology renewal in digital transformation. Information Systems Journal, 31(1), 198225.

Yakubu, M. N., & Dasuki, S. I. (2019). Factors affecting the adoption of e-learning technologies among higher education students in Nigeria: A structural equation modelling approach. Information Development, 35(3), 492502.

Zhou, T. (2012). Understanding users' initial trust in Mobile banking: An elaboration likelihood perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 15181525.

Zhu, K., Dong, S., Xu, S. X., & Kraemer, K. L. (2006). Innovation diffusion in global contexts: Determinants of post-adoption digital transformation of European companies. European Journal of Information Systems, 15, 601616.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the editor and reviewers for their valuable contribution to the paper. Their insightful comments and suggestions have greatly improved the quality of this work. The authors would also like to extend their heartfelt gratitude to the management of Heritage Christian University College for their generous financial support towards the development of the paper.

Corresponding author

Kingsley Ofosu-Ampong can be contacted at: kingofosu11@gmail.com

Related articles