Contrasting approaches to very highcapacity network regulation and policy: a comparative analysis of France, Portugal, Spain and the UK (2008–2020)

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to examine the factors that may have contributed to different levels of very high-capacity network (VHCN) coverage, with a particular focus on the role of regulation and State aid.

Design/methodology/approach

A comparative empirical study based on multiple case studies was conducted in France, Portugal, Spain and the UK.

Findings

Although France, Portugal and Spain initially adopted similar regulatory strategies for VHCN deployment, the outcomes differed significantly. The UK, with a more demanding regulation, achieved a residual coverage. This study highlights the importance of the regulatory approach to VHCN access in balancing private and public investment and emphasizes the importance of State aid in the policy agenda for nationwide VHCN deployment projects.

Research limitations/implications

Research on complex phenomena, such as the impact of regulation on investment or the effectiveness of State aid procedures, may focus on specific events to the detriment of others, which could bias the results.

Practical implications

The findings of this study provide insights for policymakers involved in State aid decisions and regulators by understanding the importance of timely State aid interventions, efficient governance and the impact of regulation on investment incentives.

Originality/value

This paper extends the literature on the impact of regulation on investment incentives and State aid as a tool to complement private investment for VHCN deployment through in-depth case studies.

Citation

Manica, L. (2024), "Contrasting approaches to very highcapacity network regulation and policy: a comparative analysis of France, Portugal, Spain and the UK (2008–2020)", Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-07-2023-0111