Intelligibility and cellularity in the villas of Palladio and Le Corbusier: examining Rowe's observations

Abstract

Purpose

In the 1947 article, The Mathematics of the Ideal Villa, Colin Rowe famously compared the spatial and geometric properties of buildings by two architects: Palladio and Le Corbusier. Many of Rowe's observations in this article have since been extensively debated but not rigorously tested. This paper examines Rowe's proposition that Palladio's villa plans possess greater intelligibility and cellularity than Le Corbusier's villa plans.

Design/methodology/approach

Two established computational techniques, axial line analysis and isovist analysis, are adopted in this paper to quantify and compare the properties of intelligibility and cellularity in the four villas that Rowe used to construct his argument: Malcontenta, Rotunda, Stein, and Savoye.

Findings

While acknowledging methodological limitations, the results of this paper do not support Rowe's claims, but they do lead to a unique quantitative examination of spatial configurations and properties of four famous villa plans.

Originality/value

This is the first paper to quantitatively examine Rowe's claims that Palladian villas possess greater intelligibility and cellularity than Le Corbusier's villas.

Citation

Dawes, M.J., Lee, J.H. and Ostwald, M.J. (2023), "Intelligibility and cellularity in the villas of Palladio and Le Corbusier: examining Rowe's observations", Archnet-IJAR, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 287-300. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-02-2022-0034