Sustainability and socially responsible food consumption: an empirical investigation based on self-awareness and self-congruity theories

Shahid Rasool (Department of Economics and Business, Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Engineering Sciences and Technology, Topi, Pakistan)
Roberto Cerchione (Department of Engineering, University of Naples “Parthenope”, Naples, Italy)
Piera Centobelli (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy)
Eugenio Oropallo (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy)
Jari Salo (Department of Economics and Management, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland)

Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics

ISSN: 1355-5855

Article publication date: 25 December 2023

Issue publication date: 9 April 2024

1640

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to highlight the impact of altruistic-self and hunger awareness on socially responsible food consumption through the lens of self-awareness and self-congruity theories due to the great challenge of Sustainable Development Goal 2: Zero Hunger.

Design/methodology/approach

A survey was conducted with a sample of 812 respondents. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) confirm each variable's structure through the measurement model and test the hypothesis to support a structural model.

Findings

The results highlight that the combination of altruistic-self and hunger awareness (AS-HA congruence) drives consumers to execute socially responsible food consumption. Meanwhile, consumers' food-saving attitude mediation translates to the attitude towards responsible and ethical use increasing socially responsible food consumption, a contextual development in the theory of congruence. Conversely, hunger awareness is not confirmed as significantly influencing socially responsible food consumption.

Practical implications

This research provides valuable insights for academicians and practitioners in developing food waste management strategies that can be implemented to reduce food wastage.

Originality/value

Food waste is a global concern and is challenging for many manufacturing, distribution and individual wastage levels. However, food wastage by consumers is one of the most critical problems which can be minimised with awareness and attitudinal changes in behaviour as a form of socially responsible consumption.

Keywords

Citation

Rasool, S., Cerchione, R., Centobelli, P., Oropallo, E. and Salo, J. (2024), "Sustainability and socially responsible food consumption: an empirical investigation based on self-awareness and self-congruity theories", Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, Vol. 36 No. 4, pp. 993-1023. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-07-2022-0559

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Shahid Rasool, Roberto Cerchione, Piera Centobelli, Eugenio Oropallo and Jari Salo

License

Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode


1. Introduction

Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) represent the significant challenges of the twenty-first century (Do et al., 2021; Munir, 2022), and among them, food waste and hunger are considered pivotal sustainability issues (Farr-Wharton et al., 2014; Lazell, 2016; Bhatt et al., 2018; Hamerman et al., 2018; Makhal et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2021; Elhoushy, 2022). The idea of socially responsible food consumption is an emerging concern as one-third of the food available for human use is being wasted each year around the globe, while in other parts of the planet, people suffer hunger (Graham-Rowe et al., 2014; Fan et al., 2022). There is a common consensus that not only supply chains are responsible for sustainability issues (Ramanathan et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2015; Dubey et al., 2017a, b; Mishra et al., 2018; Kamble et al., 2019) but also consumers should be responsible enough for their actions to reduce food waste, predominantly their plate-food consumption (Graham-Rowe et al., 2014; Thi et al., 2015; Coşkun and Filimonau, 2021). Plate-food waste refers to the food left on an individual's plate, which could be eaten by someone else (Dubois, 1990). This waste is caused by food over-filling due to ignoring the right plate portion size and unawareness about unprivileged people's hunger issues (Betz et al., 2015; Pirani and Arafat, 2016). Food waste is usually believed to come from developed countries (Graham-Rowe et al., 2014); however, developing countries face relatively more significant food waste management challenges (Kapepula et al., 2007; Thi et al., 2015; Thapa Karki et al., 2021). According to United Nations (UN) report (United Nations Environment Programme, 2021), the global food waste created by households is approximately 600bn kilos per year, whereas there is a higher contribution from middle-income countries (respectively 211.60bn kilos per year and 290.29bn kilos per year for low middle-income countries) than high-income countries (contribute only with 98.35 kilos per year). However, considering the kilos per capita per year, there is no discernible difference between the advanced countries and emerging counties, that is a common trend of the last decades (Graham-Rowe et al., 2014; Thi et al., 2015; United Nations Environment Programme, 2021). The empirical evidence highlights that consumers can be one of the main contributors to food wastage (Graham-Rowe et al., 2014). According to Mani and Gunasekaran (2018), despite the increasing awareness of social sustainability issues, there is still little knowledge about the impact of social sustainability from the final consumers. Individual consumer choices are the main critical players in food waste, followed by the production process and food distribution process (Aschemann-Witzel et al., 2015; Caldeira et al., 2019). Therefore, irresponsible consumer behaviour is the root of food waste (Holm, 2003), which accounts for various negative economic, social and environmental consequences (Betz et al., 2015; Thi et al., 2015; de Souza et al., 2021). It is prevailing because the food consumption paradigm has changed from nutrition needs to food consumption (Rozin et al., 1999). The change of this paradigm is not limited to people's hedonistic nature, but there are structural forces behind them as political and economic policies and lack of attention on food education in the education system (Evans, 2012; Mani et al., 2016; Dankevych et al., 2020). Therefore, incorrect food consumption patterns and irresponsible social behaviours significantly impact food waste in a society where there are people who systematically suffer from hunger (Betz et al., 2015; Thi et al., 2015).

In this study, only the plate-food waste individual contributions have been considered since it is a significant portion of overall food waste, and the developed country limit was removed since no more only these countries are food wasters but also developing ones (Comstock et al., 1979). Unfortunately, there are few strategies available in the literature to discourage plate-food waste (e.g. rescheduling the lunch hour time, improving the food quality, providing nutrition education, customisation of food serving sizes and self-service) and a lack of quantitative measurement of food waste in no industrial field (Wilson, 1996; Kantor et al., 1997; Graham-Rowe et al., 2014). Therefore, administrations cannot have the right knowledge to execute severe food-waste programs (i.e. educational policies); consequently, these strategies alone cannot stop the rise of the food waste rate (Betz et al., 2015; Thi et al., 2015; Li et al., 2021).

Earlier research on the link between food waste, hunger and socio-demographic conditions highlights the need to implement food policies that directly and indirectly impact food waste. Surveys on attitudes and behaviours have shown correlations between food waste behaviours and socio-demographic characteristics (Pearson et al., 2013). It has been proved that government rules and corporate policies on product marketing and design can impact consumer behaviour and attitudes, even though it is unclear what specific variables determine this influence (Reisch et al., 2021). The COVID-19 pandemic has reduced the levels of food waste within families, which have managed to improve food waste by reducing the number of meals at restaurants and cooking more at home, and 50% of the families have maintained these good practices even after the restrictions were lifted (Laila et al., 2021). In line with this, Eissa (2020) suggested a high level of awareness and global commitment to the SDGs even though the pandemic crisis helped reduce this awareness. However, it has been shown that government policies have a considerable impact in the fight against food waste by working on aspects such as self-awareness of hunger and altruistic-self, food waste and hunger awareness, and the best attitude to economic and socially sustainable behaviour. These policies can be social and educational, but they differ according to the context in which they are applied (Buzby et al., 2011; Quested et al., 2013; WasteMinz, 2014; Thyberg and Tonjes, 2016).

Psychological models, such as the self-congruity theory and self-awareness theory, can contribute considerably to the problem that supports constructing a behavioural and attitude framework (Mathews, 2012). Moreover, the utilisation of these theories has been well-documented in customer behaviour studies in the marketing field (Li and Uysal, 2016) and can be used similarly in this field that has been poorly investigated.

Thus, we posit that socially responsible food consumption can be determined by self-congruence aspects like the altruistic-self (Barasch et al., 2014; Rasool et al., 2019) and hunger awareness, the matter of food waste concern (Graham-Rowe et al., 2014). Besides, the lack of awareness of social responsibility towards food waste represents a social barrier to the failure of food waste reduction (Graham-Rowe et al., 2014). With these premises, four research questions were developed:

RQ1.

What is the role of consumers' altruistic-self in ethical food consumption to walk their talk?

RQ2.

What factors affect socially responsible consumer behaviour through self-congruity theory?

RQ3.

What will be the collective and distant impact of altruistic-self-concept and hunger awareness on socially responsible consumption of plate-food?

RQ4.

Does the consumer's food-saving attitude impact socially responsible behaviour for plate-food?

Given the substantial research gaps, the current study analyses the role of the consumer altruistic-self (an individual's faith to do something good for the enormous benefit of others) and hunger awareness in plate-food consumption. Scarce research exists on plate-food waste, and the literature does not realise the importance of the food audit (Eriksson et al., 2017). To bridge the gap, it is necessary to trace out the constructs that enhance the consumer's socially responsible food consumption for plate food. The proposed model aims to predict socially responsible plate-food consumption with these premises.

The remainder of the paper is structured as follows. After the introduction, section 2 analyses the theories used for the framework development, the different aspects used and the related hypothesis. Section 3 presents the methodology, whereas Section 4 deals with the result obtained. Discussion and implications of this research are discussed in Section 5. Finally, Section 6 reports the conclusions.

2. Theoretical background

Many academicians and practitioners have studied food waste and how consumers can impact this problem (Mathews, 2012). Graham-Rowe et al. (2014) have proposed that people's concern about food waste and their empowerment regarding the cause can keep household waste to a minimum; in fact, the wish to provide healthy and abundant food for family or guests united with the desire to minimise inconvenience are substantial barriers to minimising food waste for some household food purchasers. Furthermore, some consumers consider food waste a compromise with the hunger issue, while others consider the reuse of cooked food residues with negative meaning (Aschemann-Witzel et al., 2015; Parizeau et al., 2015; Roe et al., 2020).

Li et al. (2021) have also identified that consumer behaviours (e.g. illogical purchase plans, lack of cooking skills) and consumer hunger perception and attitudes (e.g. attitudes towards food waste, food safety concerns, the perceived value of food and knowledge of food production) are relevant issues in managing food waste. From a different point of view, Florkowski et al. (2018) and Song et al. (2018) have tested that social and cultural aspects (i.e. education, household size and age, employment status and urbanisation level) are relevant factors influencing household food waste. For instance, many consumers believe that their low food portions will also decrease their energy intake from meals, which consequently hurdles their decision to take low food portions; with this cultural cognition, they cook more than they need and often throw away uneaten food (Rolls et al., 2007). Moreover, age has affected food waste generation, with young people wasting more than older people and polarising food distribution towards specific areas (Quested and Johnson, 2009; WasteMinz, 2014). In Australia, 38% of respondents wasted more than $ 30 (Australian) household items on food compared to 7% of people aged 70 and over (Hamilton et al., 2005). In the UK, people over 65 waste much less food than the rest (Quested et al., 2013). Furthermore, family composition and family size significantly influence the production of household food waste, like children's presence or the household's income (WasteMinz, 2014; Parizeau et al., 2015). Due to these reasons, plate-food waste is both a consequence of individuals' negligence and a result of the conditions in which food is provided. As the first step, government interventions and educational policies should be implemented for awareness, and individual behaviour could be targeted autonomously to increase willingness to perform social responsibilities (Evans, 2012; Graham-Rowe et al., 2014; Eriksson et al., 2017; Li et al., 2021).

These governmental interventions can be significant for the behavioural insight that can reach the right confidence to develop the connection between awareness of food-plate waste and socially responsible behaviours in the domestic edges (Eriksson et al., 2017). In addition, even a policy that aims to spread awareness of the hunger problem has shown that it can raise awareness of food consumption attitudes (Khalid et al., 2019; Bridge et al., 2021).

Consumer psychology research has also evaluated that congruence between the common perception of the brand and their perception influences individual behaviour (Choi and Reid, 2016; Huber et al., 2018). Unfortunately, scarce research exists on plate-food waste, and the literature does not realise the importance of the food plate audit (Eriksson et al., 2017). Nonetheless, previous research suggests that consumer self-concept and awareness influence food consumption attitude and behaviour (Bagozzi et al., 2014) and awareness (Cordell, 1997; Rortveit and Olsen, 2007). The following sections explain some theories and aspects helpful in constructing the framework.

2.1 Self-awareness theory

The self-awareness theory (SAT) is the alleged social mechanism explaining people's behaviour towards plate-food waste (Padgett, 2011; Brandenberger and Bowman, 2015). This mechanism suggests that when people enter a public situation or one that may impact their own life in society, social norms are activated, resulting in people's attention more to themselves than others (Munger and Harris, 1989; Berry et al., 2012). Furthermore, this attention to self is associated with greater adherence to the triggered social norm, thus ensuring that the person is not deviant (Berry et al., 2012; Brandenberger and Bowman, 2015; Min and Wakslak, 2022). Furthermore, this behaviour is also common on social networks that, with different influences, can polarise the attention towards plate-food waste (Gong et al., 2023).

From the SAT body of literature on awareness, four explanations have resulted in a predictor of food consumption in consumer behaviour: benevolence, ecology, equality and universalism (Aertsens et al., 2009). In particular, benevolence and universalism are two factors stabilising awareness, guaranteeing regular and correct food consumption (Krystallis et al., 2008; Graham-Rowe et al., 2014). In the same way, consumers who have a high awareness of the ecology motive (defined as “harmony with the universe and sustainable future”) and equality (defined as “harmony with the all-other people”) tend to waste less food in their daily lives (Zanoli and Naspetti, 2002; Graham-Rowe et al., 2014; Mattar et al., 2018). All these aspects can be summarised at a higher human emotional level which is that of altruism that goes beyond the person who consumes food and can therefore be better defined as an altruistic-self (Brandenberger and Bowman, 2015; Rasool et al., 2019).

2.2 Self-congruence theory

The self-congruence theory (SCT) is a model for bringing a change in attitude, which explains the relationship between attitudinal change towards a particular message (Osgood and Tannenbaum, 1955). The concept of self-congruence is rooted in psychology literature, which reflects the process of cognitive matching with the consumer's self-concept in the product-user image (Sirgy, 2018). Furthermore, the SCT is widely used in research investigating the influence of symbolic and functional congruence on client behaviour (Jamal et al., 2022). For example, the SCT states the psychological process and outcome in which consumers compare their perception of a brand's personality or brand user's image with their actual, ideal, social and ideal social self-concepts (Sirgy, 2018).

SCT emphasises the importance of congruity between the consumer's self-concept and the brand image controlled by their perceived similarities or dissimilates to self-image characteristics (Astakhova et al., 2017). Based on this theory's assumptions, how individuals perceive themselves significantly influences their behaviour (Sirgy, 2018). If objective number 2 of the SDGs is taken as a reference brand, that is, the fight against hunger, it will obviously be possible to verify a direct change in the personal lifestyle rather than in the attitude of a given consumer towards this social brand. Consumers make evaluations or purchase decisions based on consumer self-awareness and express themselves through actions linked to the brand they refer (Pieters, 2013; Bartels and Urminsky, 2015). Therefore, it is possible to assume a connection between the consumer's self-concept and the determination of consumer attitudes and behaviours. These aspects have been frequently considered linked in consumer behaviour research where these links can be, for instance, the brand idea, the hedonic value or the perceived efficacy (Claiborne and Sirgy, 2015; Zhang and Benyoucef, 2016). The culture represents one other relevant connection between the consumer's self-concept and the determination of consumer attitudes and behaviours. This aspect can influence the consumer to think about purchasing food more than having a sustainable approach to the use of food (Zhang and Benyoucef, 2016). The SCT was selected to support our research framework, and further information about the research construct is discussed in the following paragraphs.

2.3 Modelling of framework and hypotheses development

Even though food waste has attracted global attention in recent years due to its significant resource, environmental, economic and social impacts, the research about food waste has been focused on the industrial aspect neglecting the domestic influence variable (Min et al., 2020; Qi et al., 2020). For this reason, the main variables are reported in developing our framework according to SCT and SAT.

2.3.1 Altruistic-self

Altruistic-self (AS) refers to an individual's consciousness to do something good for the more incredible benefit of someone to charitable engagement (Padgett, 2011; Brandenberger and Bowman, 2015). The early research suggests that an altruistically motivated self would perform altruistic behaviours for social good, expressing an individual's internal values and pro-social behaviours (Schwartz, 1977; Sigurðardóttir, 2017). However, few elements have been extended from the literature on food consumption; mainly, two specific factors have been considered: personal health and being environmentally friendly (Kareklas et al., 2014). According to SAT, if people are socially motivated to be concerned about emotional health and a clean environment, they would be encouraged to activate their AS to perform good social actions (Graham-Rowe et al., 2014; Schwartz, 1977).

2.3.2 Hunger awareness

According to Nahman et al. (2012), awareness regarding food value needs to be raised. The current study has attended this call by having Hunger Awareness (HA) as a research variable. Based on the assumptions of SCT, we propose that hunger awareness relates to food waste minimisation on human consciousness accounts to save food for survival. Moreover, an AS drive and awareness about a particular phenomenon would direct individuals' attitudes and behaviours (Osgood and Tannenbaum, 1955; Bartels and Urminsky, 2015). Hence, the consumer's motivation to reduce food waste with HA would encourage own to get involved in minimum food waste activities to highlight the possibility of recovering potentially valuable food sources or resources for use in other processes or raising awareness regarding the associated losses to society (Nahman et al., 2012). Furthermore, the more awareness constrains people's autonomy, the more people will act consciously according to the level of awareness owned (Min and Wakslak, 2022).

2.3.3 Congruence

The congruence considers different awareness types (e.g. actual-self, ideal-self, social-self, social ideal-self) (He and Mukherjee, 2007; Jamal and Al-Marri, 2007). Furthermore, congruence is a high-level factor in social behaviour since the consumer's self-concept is linked to determining consumer attitudes and behaviours and, consequently, to the food used (Claiborne and Sirgy, 2015; Zhang and Benyoucef, 2016). So, within this study, it looks necessary to focus on the congruity between individuals' self and awareness of hunger from external sources to analyse their discrete and collective impact on a particular behaviour (socially responsible consumption of plate food).

2.3.4 Food saving attitude towards food waste

In behavioural literature, attitude is a long-term assessment process that could not be experienced directly (Arnould et al., 2002; Shiu et al., 2011). Vogel and Wanke (2016) define attitude as an individual's feedback to respond to an object. For a comprehensive explanation of attitude, this construct comprises three main factors: cognition (i.e. the belief of the consumer regarding an object), affection (i.e. the feeling of a consumer regarding an object) and conative (i.e. commitment) (Triandis et al., 1971; Heesup et al., 2011). According to this definition of attitude, it is plausible to think that attitude is essential for elaborating why consumers are concerned about unethical behaviour such as plate-food waste. The SAT, as also other theories like the theory of planned behaviour, confirms that attitude towards a behaviour would influence the intention of a person to connect in that behaviour, while attitude refers to the perception of individuals, even if a behaviour is supportive or otherwise (Ajzen, 1985; Bailey, 2006). However, according to SCT, self-congruence significantly predicts various consumer behaviours, attitudes, choices and preferences; thus, it is possible to measure the customer target's actual and ideal self-congruence (Ahn et al., 2013).

2.3.5 Socially responsible plate food consumption

Several definitions of socially responsible consumption outlined by previous researchers exist in the literature. For example, Mohr et al. (2001) stated that socially responsible consumption is based on the corporate social responsibility (CSR) concept, where a person customises their own acquisitions per the ethical consumption standards to ensure long-term social benefits.

According to Karsaklian and Fee (2012), there are four main socially responsible consumer types: (1) reuse and save resources, (2) prefer environmental benefits over economical, (3) purchase ethical products because others do and (4) ethical but without being responsible for environmental protection.

In this regard, consumers' concern about environmental protection and ethical consumption behaviour, as a result, makes a difference in society's favour and drastically changes the environment through consumers' responsible consumption (Lue et al., 2010). Thus, a consumer's socially responsible behaviour can ensure environmental sustainability. Moisander (2007) reveals that the actual reasons for socially responsible food consumption are engaged in the selection, purchasing, usage and serving activities. Results indicated that socially responsible food consumption rapidly decreases because consumers are unaware of its impact on the environment (Moisander, 2007). Therefore, the consumer's socially responsible food consumption can support the awareness dissemination of its positive effect on society (Boccia and Sarnacchiaro, 2017).

Previous literature states that an individual's self-concept and attitude have a significant relationship (Hattie, 2014). The SAT predicts that an emotional concept of self, such as the altruistic-self, can impact self-attitudes like one's eating attitude (Padgett, 2011; Brandenberger and Bowman, 2015). Breiner and Reeve (2009) established a connection between human self-concept and attitude variables. The utilisation of self-concept has been well-documented in consumer behaviour, even though earlier studies essentially consider only four categories: actual-self, ideal-self, social-self and ideal social-self (Li and Uysal, 2016). The fundamental logic of the four categories of self-concepts that were used in consumer behaviour was just to experience their association with the commercial marketing concept (Ekinci and Riley, 2003; Jamal and Al-Marri, 2007; Ibrahim and Najjar, 2008; Min and Wakslak, 2022; Gong et al., 2023). Based on the number of self-concepts, human personality changed over time: previous studies verified the relationship between academic self-concept and reading attitude and found that self-concept positively influenced education's reading attitude (Alvord, 1971; Tapia-Fonllem et al., 2013). Thus, in light of previous research, the relationship between AS and attitude can be developed to examine socially responsible consumer behaviour. Therefore, we have predicted that the consumer's AS will positively drive their food waste attitude. We propose that:

H1.

Altruistic-self positively influences the consumer food saving attitude.

Consumer attitude has always been a concern for marketers and academics, so they seek solutions to enhance awareness and alter consumer approaches towards a particular issue (Spehr and Curnow, 2011; Min and Wakslak, 2022) and the SAT gives the proper theoretical basis to formalise this connection (Graham-Rowe et al., 2014). Likewise, hunger is a social issue between consumer hunger awareness and food saving attitude (Daniluk, 2014). Therefore, improving consumer attitude through HA is necessary to minimise the impact of the hunger social problem. Marra (2014) highlighted the relationship between consumer HA and food waste attitude. Nevertheless, consumer HA improves food saving and accelerates the formation of a more positive attitude (Evans and Durant, 1995). Hence, we propose that HA influences the consumer's attitude towards plate-food waste in our following hypothesis (H2).

H2.

Hunger awareness positively influences the food-saving attitude.

Attitude is beliefs/self-concepts and feelings connected to a resulting individual's behaviour (Tapia-Fonllem et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2023). In SAT and SCT the attitude can be moved by different reasons, but in both theories, it can be seen as a strong determinant for how the consumer behaves socially, and therefore also of how a person behaves in food plate consumption (Ekinci and Riley, 2003; Tsai et al., 2020). Rensbury (2003) study discussed that marketers need to perform vital roles to influence consumers' healthy food choices, ultimately contributing to healthier consumers and societies. In the same study, Rensbury (2003) identified the relationship between healthy consumer self-concept and food choice behaviour. In this way, Rozin et al. (2003) contended that more than 50% of college students consider eating as one most enjoyable parts of their daily lives. Thus, self-concept influenced these students' food choice behaviour. Hence, it can be postulated that consumer AS could influence the plate-food socially responsible consumption behaviour. Wang et al. (2023) also verify that even the attitude to consuming less food can be affected by moral norms and the environmental social consciousness in which people are immersed.

H3.

Altruistic-self positively influences the socially responsible plate-food consumption.

An individual consumer's awareness performs a vital role in own attitudinal change for responsible food consumption (Graham-Rowe et al., 2014). Numerous researchers have verified the relationship between consumer awareness and effective consumer behaviour (Hartlieb and Jones, 2009) and SAT also explains this connection (Graham-Rowe et al., 2014). Similarly, it has been shown that awareness of environmental concerns will reinforce the consumer to perform ethical behaviours in favour of society (Sudbury-Riley and Kohlbacher, 2016). Particularly, consumer awareness related to food products significantly impacts the food consumption decision-making process (Ishak and Zabil, 2012). Thus, in light of the understanding developed, we believe that consumers aware of the hunger issues will perform socially responsible food plate consumption to minimise food waste. Hence, we propose that:

H4.

Hunger awareness positively influences the socially responsible plate-food consumption.

According to the SAT, the various levels of self-awareness can influence each other (Ekinci and Riley, 2003; Brandenberger and Bowman, 2015; Min and Wakslak, 2022). Rabiei et al. (2013) argued that consumer nutritional awareness and self-concept significantly impact school students. Also, consumer self-concept influences cognitive processes, emotions, motivations, decisions and choices (Bringle and Bagby, 1992). In a way where self-concept can increase consumer awareness, consumer awareness increases the self-concept (Schafer et al., 1999; Tapia-Fonllem et al., 2013). A recent environmental awareness study reveals that self-concept and environmental concerns have significant positive relationships (Cousineau et al., 2018). This study shows that consumers having attached their altruistic concept linked to environmental concerns and nutritional awareness will have some significant relationship with hunger awareness. Thus, we propose the following hypothesis:

H5.

There is a significant relationship between altruistic-self and hunger awareness.

In previous studies about SAT and SCT, it has been found that actual self-concept and store image congruity are significantly correlated (Ibrahim and Najjar, 2008). The same study traced the relationship between consumer ideal self-concept and image congruity. The congruities of actual self-concept and ideal self-concept with the image have significantly influenced consumer attitude. Sirgy (2018) developed self-congruity by matching store images and testing consumer attitudes. Moreover, self-concept congruity has been proved as an antecedent of consumer attitude and behaviour (Lee and Hyman, 2008). Furthermore, Jung et al. (2020) have found that, starting from a self-congruity framework, an emotional and altruistic component towards world hunger is avoiding food waste during consumption. Thus, these relationships might be postulated that the congruity of altruistic-self and hunger awareness influence the consumer food saving attitude:

H6.

Congruity between altruistic-self and hunger awareness positively influences the consumer food saving attitude.

Behavioural literature confirms that consumer attitude significantly affects consumption behaviour (Chisnall, 1995; Jiang et al., 2018; Miao et al., 2019). Therefore, Fotopoulos and Krystallis (2002) recommended that the consumer's responsible food consumption attitude was the most vital factor in predicting their motivation to act as responsible consumer. Similarly, other studies suggest that consumers' attitudes towards organic food consumption, developed by the social environment in which they live, influence their (positive) consumption behaviour (Multlu, 2007; Kareklas et al., 2014). Furthermore, the attitude of social dynamics towards food is measured through a high or low saving attitude that influences food-saving behaviour (Multlu, 2007). On those bases, H7 is proposed as follows:

H7.

Consumer food saving attitude positively influences the socially responsible plate-food consumption.

Figure 1 depicts the relationships between the constructs and hypotheses presented earlier.

3. Research methodology

The household consumers in the university area of Kuching city were selected as respondents in this study as food consumers. To achieve the research objectives, a quantitative approach was adopted. The quantitative research approach allowed the development of a survey questionnaire. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was used to explore the simple structure of each construct (Papadopoulos et al., 2017). We used only items with a smaller loading factor than 0.50 (Byrne, 2010). Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was utilised to confirm each variable's structure through the measurement model and tested the hypothesis to support a structural model (Mehra et al., 2022). Common method bias occurs when the instrument introduces a bias in data collection due to overlapping constructs. We used the full collinearity variance inflation factors method to investigate the common method bias (Kock, 2015). According to Kock (2015), data will have common method bias issues if the variance inflation factor values are more significant than 3.3, and our result indicated no issue of common method bias issues.

3.1 Data collection

A survey approach was used to collect the respondents' responses, and primary data was collected through a structured questionnaire. The questionnaire was first written in English and translated into Bahasa Malaysia, which was translated back into English. The decision was made to ensure that the respondents from various backgrounds can answer and could answer the questions so that, in return, they would provide a more accurate response.

Table 1 contains the questions used during the interviews divided according to the model categories.

A total of 1,100 questionnaires were distributed face-to-face. A random probability sampling technique was adopted. Among them, 950 responses were used in the data screening process. During data screening, 138 responses were deemed unusable. Thus, the final data were analysed with the responses of 812 observations. The gender proportions are almost equivalent; about 55% of the respondents are male, and nearly 45% are female. Most of the respondents are between 36 and 40 years old (51.75%) and a large number of the respondents (81%) belonged to married respondents.

3.2 Measures

Measures were adapted from previous literature while the modifications were made as per Malaysian context. The altruistic-self-concept measure was adapted from Tapia-Fonllem et al. (2013) and Corral-Verdugo et al. (2008). The scale was based on ten items and on a five-point Likert scale anchored from strongly disagree = 1 to strongly agreed = 5. The measure of socially responsible plate-food consumption behaviour was adapted from the studies of Antil (1984), Francois-Lecompte and Roberts (2006) and González-Cutre et al. (2009). All the measures were based on five-point Likert-scale.

3.3 Analysis

Reliable and discriminant of consumer altruistic-self and hunger awareness were analysed through Cronbach alpha, average variance extracted (AVE) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) as shown in Appendices 1, 2 and 3. Self-congruencies were primarily measured using mathematical formulae and discrepancy scores (Sirgy et al., 1997). Moreover, the skewness value (0.14) and kurtosis value (0.49) for the normalcy test were less than 2, which was adequate for a normal distribution (George and Mallery, 2010). The histogram's bell-shaped curve provided further proof that our data were normally distributed and that the spots in the Q-Q (quantile–quantile) plot made a straight diagonal line with slight variation (Hair et al., 2010).

Congruity between consumer altruistic-self and hunger awareness was developed with the support of a mathematical formulation named as difference model (Ericksen, 1997) as the average of the congruences between each of the assessments of the m altruistic-self and n hunger awareness variables as given in equation (1) below:

(1)ASHACK(Congruence)=1n*mi=1nj=1m|HAikASjk|
whereas:
  • ASHACK Congruence k = Altruistic-self Hunger Awareness Congruity score for respondent (k)

  • HA ik = Hunger Awareness score of respondents (k) along with attribute (i)

  • AS jk = Altruistic-self score of respondents (k) along with attribute (j)

For attaining the criteria of the factor loading, Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO), Bartlett's Test of Sphericity and Explained Variance, five questions are chosen from altruistic-self-concept measurement (ALS_6, ALS_7, ALS_8, ALS_9, ALS_10), five food saving attitude (ATT_4, ATT_5, ATT_6, ATT_7, ATT_8), five socially responsible consumptions (SRCB_1, SRCB_3, SRCB_4, SRCB_5, SRCB_6) and four from hunger awareness (HC_1, HC_2, HC_3, HC_5) respectively.

For convergent and discriminant validity, the study used the composite reliability (CR) and average variance extracted (AVE) (Hair et al., 2010). The composite value ranged from 0.79 to 0.87, more than the threshold value of 0.70 (Bagozzi and Yi, 1988). Furthermore, the AVE values are higher than the threshold value of 0.40 (Fornell and Larcker, 1981). Besides, the current research kept two items (HC-3 and ALS_6) less than 0.70. According to Janssens et al. (2008, pp. 294) researchers can retain those items in the constructs which are having there loading at 0.5 and must be significant (T-value >1.96). Therefore, in this study research, these items were maintained because their significant level was greater than their threshold value. Researchers can retain items which are loading at 0.50 to 0.99 (Wolfinbarger and Gilly, 2003).

The CFA was used for all endogenous and exogenous latent variables. Maximum-likelihood estimation of CFA is performed. During CFA, the model could not achieve a good fit because the χ2-value was 4.29, the Goodness-of-Fit Index (GFI) value was 0.901, Comparative Fit Index (CFI) value was 0.89, Standardised Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) value was 0.05, and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) value was 0.07. All the cut-off values are acceptable except CFI values (less than 0.90); measurement model fit showed relatively poor fit.

In the first round by using the modification index, two co-variances were created between ALS_6 to ALS 7 and HC_2 to HC_3. Ideally, the average inter-item correlation for a set of items should be between 0.20 and 0.40, suggesting that while the items are reasonably homogenous, they do contain sufficiently unique variance not to be isomorphic. When values are lower than 0.20, the items may not represent the same content domain. If values are higher than 0.40, the items may only capture a small bandwidth of the construct (Cohen and Swerdlik, 2005). Moreover, the content of each item (ALS_6 and ALS_7) and similar (HC-2 and HC-3) are not going to overleaping. On that basis, its hard for researchers to delete any item even though t-values of all the items are greater than 1.96 (Wolfinbarger and Gilly, 2003). As a result, upon making co-variances, the better-fitted model was then identified with reduced χ2-value value 4.29–3.54, the GFI value was 0.92, CFI value was 0.92 and RMSEA value was 0.07. In this stance, all other fit indices showed substantial improvement to the overall fit to the model.

Besides, for testing the multicollinearity, the Herman single factor test was used, which gave 40.5% variation when all factors were placed on a single factor, was used to screen for common method bias (Chang et al., 2010). This research's common latent factor test also verified no common method bias. The method recommended by Gaskin (2012) was employed in the execution of this examination. There was no greater than 0.20 difference between the standardised regression weights with and without the shared latent component.

4. Results

The hypothesis related to consumer altruistic-self-concept H1 and H3 indicated a significant positive effect of altruistic-self-concept on attitude β = 0.19 (5.31) and socially responsible consumption behaviour β = 0.25 (3.99). Hence, consumer self-concepts have significantly influenced consumer attitude and behaviour. Accordingly, consumers try to improve the altruistic-self in their personalities for a socially responsible plate-food-saving attitude.

Similarly, H2 and H4 hypotheses related to consumer awareness were approved that hunger awareness has an insignificant effect on consumer food saving attitude β = 0.04 (0.71), although the significant impact on socially responsible consumption towards plate-food β = 0.19 (3.821). Further, the H5 hypothesis measures the relationship between altruistic-self-concept and consumer hunger awareness, which is the basic assumption to develop the congruence between variables. Hence, r-value highlights a significant relationship (r = 0.15 and t = 3.35) between altruistic-self and hunger awareness. Therefore, the study highlights that consumer altruistic-self-concept and awareness have a bivariate correlation.

Further, the H6 hypothesis indicated a significant positive congruence between altruistic-self and consumer hunger awareness on consumer food-saving attitude β = 0.44 (8.68). This hypothesis proved that the higher the congruity between consumer altruistic-self-concept and awareness, the higher the effect on consumers socially responsible plate-food waste attitude. Hypothesis H7 indicated a significant positive effect β = 0.351 (6.29) consumer food saving attitude on socially responsible consumption towards plate-food, as demonstrated in Table 2 and see Figure 2.

5. Discussion

Under SCT and SAT, socially responsible plate-food consumption is a novel investigation concept. Recent research on ethical consumption has highlighted its significance as consumers advocate for ethical food consumption: there is a strong connection between altruistic-self and hunger awareness. Furthermore, despite consumers' awareness of the importance of sustainable eating and plate food consumption, consumers face challenges in transforming attitudes into real and consistent actions (Govind et al., 2019). The current study investigates the underpinnings of consumers' altruism and hunger awareness to better understand socially responsible plate food consumption. The theoretical constructs altruistic-self-concept, attitude and hunger awareness were used in this study better to understand their impact on socially responsible food consumption. Furthermore, under the SCT perspective, a variable of congruence has been added between altruistic-self and hunger awareness to evaluate a further dynamic of influence of consumer behaviour, experienced in other sectors, but never in that on the use or waste of food. Current research has highlighted the unique nature of constructs in a single framework to eliminate food waste as a social concern.

It has been discovered that consumers' altruistic-self is positively related to their attitude towards consumer plate-food with social responsibility. This aspect explains how responsible plate-food consumption results in sustainable food consumption for the entire society. Even though hunger awareness has no significant direct influence on attitudes, the construct significantly impacts socially responsible plate-food consumption (Dommeyer and Gross, 2009; Ishak and Zabil, 2012). According to research, consumer awareness contributes to ethical and socially responsible food consumption, as responsible food consumption is a matter of social and environmental concerns (Shaw and Newholm, 2002). Our research findings are consistent with previous findings, indicating that hunger awareness influences socially responsible plate-food consumption. Furthermore, it demonstrates that when consumers are fully aware of the global hunger situation, they quickly engage in socially responsible food consumption.

According to research, to reduce food waste, consumers should consume small portions (Freedman and Brochado, 2010). In this case, hunger awareness will not affect their food-saving attitude, despite research showing that smaller food portions do not reduce meal energy intake (Rolls et al., 2007). As a result, public awareness campaigns and extensive research in this area are required to educate people about food portions and nutrients (Dankevych et al., 2020). As previously stated, the altruistic-self significantly influences the food-saving attitude (Marra, 2014). Similarly, altruistic-self congruence and hunger awareness influence consumer food-saving attitudes rather than the altruistic-self and hunger awareness effects separately (Rensbury, 2003). In this way, it is possible to affirm that the variables of altruistic-self and hunger awareness, as from the foundations of SAT, consistently influence the problem under consideration, that is the responsible consumption of food but little on its attitude. According to the SCT, it was possible to ascertain that the alignment between the internal dimension of the altruistic-self and the external one of hunger awareness can have a considerable impact on attitudes and, therefore, through the mediation of this latter variable, on the responsible consumption of food. It is important to note that the food-saving attitude positively influences the socially responsible consumption of food plate. When consumers' altruistic-self is linked to hunger awareness, the relationship between altruism, hunger awareness and socially responsible plate-food consumption strengthens with food-saving attitude mediation. As a result, while mediated by attitude, the congruence between altruistic-self and hunger awareness significantly influenced socially responsible plate-food consumption. It demonstrates that when a consumer wishes to opt for simple consumption and reduce food waste (Shaw and Newholm, 2002), the level of effect of socially responsible plate-food consumption and the congruity between altruistic-self and hunger awareness is significantly stronger when mediated by attitude. This aspect implies that consumer attitude is critical in reducing food waste. Therefore, it is necessary to consider consumers' altruistic-self to bring about social change in attitude and behaviour regarding socially responsible food consumption.

5.1 Theoretical contribution

This study has made a theoretical contribution in four ways. First, it has introduced a novel theoretical framework by meaningfully reinforcing the importance of presented research variables. This study has integrated research variables: altruistic-self, hunger awareness, congruity, food-saving attitude, and socially responsible plate-food consumption to highlight the importance of this social matter in marketing.

Second, the congruence theory application, used to develop the congruity between altruistic-self and hunger awareness, is a unique contribution of this study; an introduction of research variable that links the consumers' self with own awareness about hunger. In theory, this development has extended the congruence theory scope to understand the link between awareness and self.

Third, the congruence of consumer altruistic-self and consumer hunger awareness is meaningful for developing the attitude towards socially responsible plate-food consumption. To our observation, we conducted the first comprehensive, systematic study to identify and formulate a conceptual framework for socially responsible plate-food consumption with the support of altruistic-self, hunger awareness and attitude in the domain of SCT in the Malaysian context (Li and Uysal, 2016). From the present study's findings, it is concluded that the self-congruence does exist between altruistic-self and hunger awareness, and SCT is validated in plate-food consumers in the Malaysian context.

Fourth, the findings provide a strong connection between food-saving attitude and socially responsible plate-food consumption – a change in attitude is significant for food waste management campaigns. Meanwhile, congruence is measured between altruistic-self and consumer awareness. Finally, social consumer awareness could also measure the congruence between ideal-self, social-self and actual-self.

5.2 Practical implications

Marketers may think there are no incentives to reduce plate-food wastage (Wansink, 2018). They may also feel more food consumption will ensure high gains because of sales growth. However, the current study significantly contributes to practitioners ethically improving the business's efficiency.

First, astute marketers would anticipate the possibility of profiting from reducing food waste on their plate. Considering that people appear to be sensitive both to a reasonable reduction in the portion of food on their plate if this supports the fight against hunger and to feel an active part in the fight against food waste (Carrington et al., 2010), marketing professionals have the opportunity to promote products rethought in quantity to represent a valid sustainable alternative to products that would instead contribute to food waste. Creative ad hoc designed advertisements could also have an impact on influencing consumer attitudes. Second, to satisfy ethical concerns reinforced by self-concept, buffet food service should be preferred in restaurants and public canteens, where persons with hunger awareness can be held socially accountable for plate-food waste. According to studies, buffet food services can lower food waste (Silvennoinen et al., 2015).

Furthermore, discouraging food waste through billboards and commercials with awareness messages will better impact their food-saving mentality, empowering people to be individually accountable for their food consumption. Third, in the face of the growing awareness of hunger and the increase in the socially responsible consumption of plates, creating a multidimensional communication strategy is the first step to be implemented by the government. Individuals should be more aware of the waste of food on their plates. In this context, educational institutions and media platforms can play a fundamental role in educating people of all ages. This education in food sustainability must then be applied in business contexts and seen as a possibility to increase one's profits and achieve social and environmental sustainability objectives. Besides, using eco-sustainable or recycled packaging also increases their attractiveness towards people aware of the hunger problem and therefore choose brands close to their sustainable awareness. For these reasons, companies should encourage green marketing for environmental sustainability as part of their CSR duties. Fourth, from the point of view of families, it is possible to say that parents, or in any case those who manage the household affairs, could sensitise other members of the family to consume the quantities of food necessary to have an economic savings for the family and also have an impact of social sustainability in the fight against hunger. This research has established theoretical underpinnings for the practical implications of reducing food waste. Managers and markets can use the findings of this study to develop a roadmap impacting product design, production, logistics and marketing in order to educate people about more sustainable behaviour and increase revenue and market shares.

5.3 Limitations and future research

This study entails a particular limitation as any other social research. First, this study has focused on plate-food consumption. Future researchers can highlight food consumption sources diversification and propose related strategies to counter food wastage. For instance, food wastage can be analysed in specific industries, such as packed frozen foods during manufacturing and distribution.

Second, the currently proposed research model empirically provides room for another theoretical construct, potential moderators to improve the model fitness. Thus, future research can attend this gap to increase the richness of the research framework.

Third, the respondents in this study were students. This aspect can limit the findings of research for the multi-generational population. Thus, further analysis can consider respondents from different to increase the generalisability of the research.

Fourth, this research has focused on altruistic-self, hunger-awareness and attitude, limiting this study's results to individual responsibility for socially responsible plate-food behaviour. Meanwhile, future research can focus on group-level variables to analyse the phenomenon. Furthermore, starting from the concept evolution of food consumption and how it has been changed from nutrition needs to food consumption fashion, future research should analyse how it connects with co-responsibility practices in the present conceptualisation.

Fifth, this study measured the altruistic-self and hunger awareness congruence with the help of differential formulation, but future researchers may measure the self-congruency through discrepancy score concerning the proposed variables towards a conceptual framework.

Finally, this study was conducted in Malaysia which limits the context of this study. The current results cannot provide insight into developed countries' socially responsible consumption behaviour. Future research can eliminate this limitation by comparing data from developing and developed countries to understand the phenomenon better.

6. Concluding remarks

This study extended previous literature in the field of SDG 2: “Zero Hunger” by integrating established backgrounds of responsible food consumption behaviour into consumer SCT and SAT. The results contributed to the extensive literature documenting the effects of self-congruity between self-concepts, and brand/product image is undoubtedly an essential component of attitude and behaviour. Compared to the number of prior applications that focus on self-congruity between self-concepts (actual, idea, social and ideal social self) and brand image, the current study examined and reinforced self-congruence with altruistic-self and hunger awareness specific background of SCT and SAT. Consequently, scholars must emphasise consumer attitudes and behaviours' direct predictors (self-concepts) and the fundamental factors that develop the self-congruity effect. Further, the present study applied an extended SCT that includes altruistic self-concept and hunger awareness. These added constructs for developing self-congruity showed better prediction for attitude in the context of plate food waste. Thus, scholars should consider that the mainstream self-congruity variable is not essentially better, while altruistic self-Hunger Awareness congruity-based predictors may be more relevant, as in the food waste phenomena. Conclusively, despite the limited use of SCT (Plewa and Palmer, 2014) in social marketing, the present study emphasised its significance in guiding food waste minimisation interventions. To the best of this study's knowledge, this paper was the first in sustainable consumer behaviour to examine both the direct and congruity function of altruistic-self and hunger awareness. Future researchers can enhance this stream of knowledge through supplementary investigations of self-congruity effects in this domain.

Figures

Conceptual framework of the study

Figure 1

Conceptual framework of the study

Structural model

Figure 2

Structural model

Framework variables

Sr. no.Original scaleReferenceAdapted scale
Altruistic-selfALS_1Gives clothes to the poorTapia-Fonllem (2013)I usually give food to the poor
ALS_2Assists people who fall or get hurtTapia-Fonllem (2013)I assist people who fall in hunger
ALS_3Contributes financially with the Red CrossTapia-Fonllem (2013)I help strangers asking for food
ALS_4Visit the Sick at hospitals/homesTapia-Fonllem (2013)I visit the sick at hospitals or their homes to take them food
ALS_5Helps older or handicapped crossing streetTapia-Fonllem (2013)I help old or handicapped whenever I see them to receive their meals
ALS_6Guides persons asking for directionTapia-Fonllem (2013)I provide some money to the homeless to allow them to get meals
ALS_7Provides some money to homelessTapia-Fonllem (2013)I donate money to organisations for charity for the hunger issue
ALS_8Participates in fund-collection ralliesTapia-Fonllem (2013)I donate money in response to flood-affected campaigns
ALS_9Donates blood in response to campaignsTapia-Fonllem (2013)I participate in fund-collection activities for hungry people
ALS_10Cooperates with colleaguesTapia-Fonllem (2013)I look after my neighbours for food necessities
Hunger awarenessHC_1Hungry people are increasing rapidly in the worldSavary et al. (2020)Hungry people are increasing rapidly in the world
HC_2Children suffers more in nutrition security situationMitra et al. (2019)Children are more affected by the scarcity of food
HC_3Food insecurity is a daily reality for hundreds of millions of people around the worldWebb et al. (2006)There are many people around me who are food insecure
HC_4Knowledge about hungry people is increasing all around the worldGoodman et al. (2012)Most of the people have knowledge about hungry people
HC_5Several organisations are working to achieve agri-food sustainabilityGoodman et al. (2012)Several organisations are working to relieve world hunger
AttitudeATT_1I prefer to buy products made from recycled paper or plasticKareklas et al. (2014)I prefer eco-sustainable food on the plate
ATT_2Generally speaking, buying counterfeit market goods is a better choiceMiao et al. (2019)I believe that using food with clear origin and composition on the plate is a better choice for taste
ATT_3I believe minimum food on the plate can help the environmentConrad et al. (2020)I believe a minimum quantity of food on the plate helps the environment
ATT_4I believe in being careful about how I spend my moneyKareklas et al. (2014)I prefer a small quantity of food on the plate because it helps to save money
ATT_5I believe that a balanced diet in plate-quantities guarantees a better distribution of foodConrad et al. (2020)I believe right food on the plate saves the food for hungry people in the world
ATT_6There is nothing wrong with purchasing counterfeit luxury productsJiang et al. (2018)There is nothing wrong with plate food waste
ATT_7Buying counterfeit luxury products generally benefit consumersJiang et al. (2018)Eating in an non-ethical way generally benefits the society
ATT_8I believe that a balanced diet guarantees a saving of water resourcesConrad et al. (2020)I believe right food on the plate helps to save the planet resources
Socially responsible consumption behaviorSRCB _1People should be concerned about reducing or limiting the noise in our societyAntil (1984)People should be concerned about reducing or limiting the plate food waste in our society
SRCB _2Every person should stop increasing their consumption of products so that our resources will last longerAntil (1984)Everyone should stop the extra consumption of food so that our food resources will last longer
SRCB _3I limit my consumption to what I really needGonzalez et al. (2009)I limit my plate food consumption to what I really need
SRCB _4In general, I try not to consume too muchGonzalez et al. (2009)I generally try to consume all the food that is available on my plate
SRCB _5I try not to buy objects that I can do by myselfFrancois-Lecompte et al. (2006)I hardly waste the plate food, which is attached to limited resources
SRCB _6I try to reduce my consumption to what I really needFrancois-Lecompte et al. (2006)I take only the portion of food I need to consume

Source(s): Created by authors

Results

Hypothesisp-value (p)t-value (t)Beta (β)Acceptance or rejection
H1Altruistic-self positively influences the consumer food saving attitude0.0005.3090.195
H2Hunger awareness positively influences the consumer food saving attitude0.4800.7070.043x
H3Altruistic-self positively influences the socially responsible plate-food consumption0.0003.9900.253
H4Hunger awareness positively influences socially responsible plate-food consumption0.0003.8160.194
H5There is a significant relationship between altruistic-self and hunger awareness0.000 0.150
H6Congruity between altruistic-self and hunger awareness positively influences the consumer food saving attitude0.0008.6760.441
H7Consumer food saving attitude positively influences the socially responsible plate-food consumption0.0006.2860.382

Note(s): p-value <0.000; CMIN/df = 3.936; GFI = 0.950; CFI = 0.906; SRMR = 0.046; TLI = 0.919; RMSEA = 0.070

Source(s): Created by authors

Summary of respondent's profile

VariableNumberPercentage
GenderFemale44955.295567
Male36344.704433
Total812100%
AgeLess than 20617.5123153
21–25 years19924.507389
26–30 years34542.487685
31–35 years809.8522167
36–40 years759.2364532
41–45 years273.3251232
46–50 years111.3546798
Above 51 years141.7241379
Total812
Current marital statusSingle33841.625616
Married43253.20197
Widowed334.0640394
Separated30.3694581
Divorced60.7389163
Total812100%
Number of family members living at homeNone131.6009852
One516.2807882
Two566.8965517
Three728.8669951
Four738.9901478
Five13416.502463
Six11514.162562
More than six29836.699507
Total812100%
Highest education completedHigh school or less27533.866995
Bachelor degree42151.847291
Master587.1428571
Doctorate253.0788177
Other334.0640394
Total812100%
EthnicityMalay40149.384236
Indian182.2167488
Chinese21326.231527
Iban435.2955665
Melanau354.3103448
Orang Ulu394.8029557
Bidayuh344.1871921
Other293.5714286
Total812100%
ReligionMuslim38747.660099
Hindu182.2167488
Christian26933.128079
Buddhist11213.793103
Others263.2019704
Total812100%
Income level (RM)Less than RM 1,50029836.699507
RM 1,501 – RM 2,50028134.605911
RM 2,501 – RM 3,50014417.73399
RM 3,501 – RM 4,500455.5418719
RM 4,501 RM 5,000253.0788177
More than RM 5,000192.3399015
Total812100%

Source(s): Created by authors

Reliability and validity indices

ConstructsItemsSFLAlphaAVECR
Altruistic-selfALS_6Guides persons asking for direction0.580.8220.4830.822
ALS_7Provides some money to homeless0.65
ALS_8Participates in fund collection rallies0.82
ALS_9Donates blood in response to campaigns0.66
ALS_10Cooperates with colleagues0.74
Hunger awarenessHC_1Hungry people are increasing rapidly in the world0.940.8690.6360.869
HC_2Children are more affected by the scarcity of food0.70
HC_3There are many people around me who are food insecure0.50
HC_5Several organisations are working to relieve world hunger0.96
AttitudeATT_4I prefer a small quantity of food on the plate because it helps to save money0.730.7850.6420.785
ATT_5I believe minimum food on the plate saves the food for hungry people in the world0.72
ATT_6There is nothing wrong with plate food waste0.54
ATT_7Eating in an ethical way generally benefits the society0.68
ATT_8I believe minimum food on the plate because it helps to save the water0.57
Social responsible consumption behaviourSRCB_1People should be concerned about reducing or limiting the plate food waste in our society0.720.8440.5200.844
SRCB_3I limit my plate food consumption to what I really need0.78
SRCB_4I generally try to consume all the food that is available on my plate0.65
SRCB_5I hardly waste the plate food, which is attached to limited resources0.70
SRCB_6I take only the portion of food I need to consume0.75

Note(s): Model fit indices: chi-square/df (cmin/df) = 3.54, the Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) = 0.92, Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = at 0.92, and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.07

SFL, Standardised factor loadings, all loadings are significant below 0.001 level; Alpha, Cronbach's alpha; CR, composite reliability; AVE, average variance extracted

Source(s): Created by authors

Result of the discriminant validity analysis

Constructs1(ALS)2(HC)3(ATT)4(SRCB)
1. Altruistic-self (ALS)0.483
2. Hunger awareness (HC)0.438**0.636
3. Attitude (ATT)0.421**0.571**0.642
4. Socially responsible consumption behaviour (SRCB)0.388**0.487**0.341**0.520

Note(s): Square root of AVE in italic

⁎⁎Correlation is significant at the 0.001 level (2-tailed)

⁎Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)

Source(s): Created by authors

Appendix 1

Table A1

Appendix 2

Table A2

Appendix 3

Table A3

References

Aertsens, J., Verbeke, W., Mondelaers, K. and Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2009), “Personal determinants of organic food consumption: a review”, British Food Journal, Vol. 111 No. 10, pp. 1140-1167, doi: 10.1108/00070700910992961ù.

Ahn, T., Ekinci, Y. and Li, G. (2013), “Self-congruence, functional congruence, and destination choice”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 66 No. 6, pp. 719-723, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.09.009.

Ajzen, I. (1985), From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.

Alvord, D.J. (1971), “Relationships among pupil self concept, attitude toward school, and achievement on selected science exercises from the National Assessment of Educational Progress”, available at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5934&context=rtd (accessed May 2019).

Antil, J.H. (1984), “Socially responsible consumers: profile and implications for public policy”, Journal of Macromarketing, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 18-39, doi: 10.1177/027614678400400203.

Arnould, E.J., Price, L. and Zinkhan, G.M. (2002), Consumers, McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Aschemann-Witzel, J., De Hooge, I., Amani, P., Bech-Larsen, T. and Oostindjer, M. (2015), “Consumer-related food waste: causes and potential for action”, Sustainability, Vol. 7 No. 6, pp. 6457-6477, doi: 10.3390/su7066457.11.

Astakhova, M., Swimberghe, K.R. and Wooldridge, B.R. (2017), “Actual and ideal-self congruence and dual brand passion”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 34 No. 7, pp. 664-672, doi: 10.1108/JCM-10-2016-1985.

Bagozzi, R.P., Batra, R. and Ahuvia, A.C. (2014), “Brand love: construct validity, managerial”, Journal of Marketing Research.

Bagozzi, R. and Yi, Y. (1988), “On the evaluation of structural equation models”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences, Vol. 16, pp. 74-94.

Bailey, T.P. (2006), “Electronic book usage at a master's level I university: a longitudinal study”, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 52-59, doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2005.10.004.

Barasch, A., Levine, E.E., Berman, J.Z. and Small, D.A. (2014), “Selfish or selfless? On the signal value of emotion in altruistic behavior”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 107 No. 3, pp. 393-413, doi: 10.1037/a0037207.

Bartels, D.M. and Urminsky, O. (2015), “To know and to care: how awareness and valuation of the future jointly shape consumer spending”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 41 No. 6, pp. 1469-1485, doi: 10.1086/680670.

Berry, T.D., Fournier, A.K. and Porter, B.E. (2012), “Developing and testing a touch-path model for hand hygiene and pathogen risk: design-behavior assessment of fast-food restaurant restrooms”, Environment and Behavior, Vol. 44 No. 4, pp. 451-473.

Betz, A., Buchli, J., Göbel, C. and Müller, C. (2015), “Food waste in the Swiss food service industry–Magnitude and potential for reduction”, Waste Management, Vol. 35, pp. 218-226, doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.015.

Bhatt, S., Lee, J., Deutsch, J., Ayaz, H., Fulton, B. and Suri, R. (2018), “From food waste to value-added surplus products (VASP): consumer acceptance of a novel food product category”, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 57-63.

Boccia, F. and Sarnacchiaro, P. (2017), “The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer preference: a structural equation analysis”, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 151-163, doi: 10.1002/csr.1446.

Brandenberger, J.W. and Bowman, N.A. (2015), “Pro-social growth during college: results of a national study”, Journal of Moral Education, Vol. 44 No. 3, pp. 328-345, doi: 10.1080/03057240.2015.1048792.

Breiner, J. and Reeve, S. (2009), “Change your attitude self esteem visualisation exercise”, available at: http://www.self-esteem-experts.com/change-your-attitude.html (accessed August 2015).

Bridge, G., Armstrong, B., Reynolds, C., Wang, C., Schmidt, X., Kause, A., Ffoulkes, C., Krawczyk, C., Miller, G., Serjeant, S. and Oakden, L. (2021), “Engaging citizens in sustainability research: comparing survey recruitment and responses between Facebook, Twitter and Qualtrics”, British Food Journal, Vol. 123 No. 9, pp. 3116-3132, doi: 10.1108/BFJ-06-2020-0498.

Bringle, R.G. and Bagby, G. (1992), “Self esteem and perceived quality of romantic and family relationships in young adults”, Journal of Research in Personality, Vol. 26, pp. 340-356, doi: 10.1016/0092-6566(92)90064-B.

Buzby, J.C., Hyman, J., Stewart, H. and Wells, H.F. (2011), “The value of retail- and consumer-level fruit and vegetable losses in the United States”, J. Consum. Affairs, Vol. 45 No. 3, pp. 492-515.

Byrne, B.M. (2010), Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, 2nd ed., Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Caldeira, C., De Laurentiis, V., Corrado, S., van Holsteijn, F. and Sala, S. (2019 In press), “Quantification of food waste per product group along the food supply chain in the European Union: a mass flow analysis”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 149, pp. 479-488, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.06.011.

Carrington, M.J., Neville, B.A. and Whitwell, G.J. (2010), “Why ethical consumers don't walk their talk: towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 97 No. 1, pp. 139-158, doi: 10.1007/s10551-010-0501-6.

Chang, S.J., Van Witteloostuijn, A. and Eden, L. (2010), “From the editors: common method variance in international business research”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 41 No. 2, pp. 178-184.

Chisnall, P.M. (1995), Consumer Behaviour, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill Book Company, England.

Choi, H. and Reid, L.N. (2016), “Congruity effects and moderating influences in nutrient-claimed food advertising”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 69 No. 9, pp. 3430-3438, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.043.

Claiborne, C. and Sirgy, M.J. (2015), “Self-image congruence as a model of consumer attitude formation and behavior: a conceptual review and guide for future research”, Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 1990 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference.

Cohen, R.J. and Swerdlik, M.E. (2005), Psychological Testing and Assessment: an Introduction to Tests and Measurement, 6th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.

Comstock, E.M., Symington, L.E., Chmielinski, H.E. and McGuire, J.S. (1979), Plate Waste in School Feeding Programs: Individual and Aggregate Measures, Army Natick Research and Development Center, Ma.

Conrad, Z., Blackstone, N.T. and Roy, E.D. (2020), “Healthy diets can create environmental trade-offs”, Depending on How Diet Quality Is Measured Nutrition Journal, Vol. 19 No. 1, 117.

Cordell, V.V. (1997), “Consumer knowledge measures as predictors in product evaluation”, Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 241-260, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793)(19970514:3<241::AID-MAR3>3.0.CO;2-B.

Corral-Verdugo, V., Carrus, G., Bonnes, M., Moser, G. and Sinha, J.B. (2008), “Environmental beliefs and endorsement of sustainable development principles in water conservation: toward a new human interdependence paradigm scale”, Environment and Behavior, Vol. 40 No. 5, pp. 703-725, doi: 10.1177/0013916507308786.

Coşkun, A. and Filimonau, V. (2021), “I waste food but this is not my fault!': exploring the drivers of plate waste in foodservices of Turkey through the prism of neutralisation theory”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 329, 129695, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129695.

Cousineau, L.S., Mock, S.E. and Glover, T.D. (2018), “Camper self-concept promotes environmental awareness: a relationship mediated by social inclusion”, Journal of Youth Development, Vol. 13 Nos 1-2, pp. 144-160.

Daniluk, J. (2014), “World hunger, food waste & how it relates to GMOs”, available at: https://juliedaniluk.com/health-tips/world-hunger-food-waste-how-it-relates-to-gmos.html (accessed 26 March 2015).

Dankevych, V.Ye., Kamenchuk, T.O., Kononova, O.Ye., Nadtochii, I.I. and Ohor, H.M. (2020), “Strategic planning for sustainable development of states: administration aspect”, International Journal of Management, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 511-522, doi: 10.34218/IJM.11.4.2020.049.

de Souza, M., Pereira, G.M., Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A.B., Chiappetta Jabbour, C.J., Trento, L.R., Borchardt, M. and Zvirtes, L. (2021), “A digitally enabled circular economy for mitigating food waste: understanding innovative marketing strategies in the context of an emerging economy”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 173, 121062, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121062.

Do, Q., Ramudhin, A., Colicchia, C., Creazza, A. and Li, D. (2021), “A systematic review of research on food loss and waste prevention and management for the circular economy”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 239, 108209, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108209.

Dommeyer, C.J. and Gross, B.L. (2009), “What consumers know and what they do: an investigation of consumer knowledge, awareness, and use of privacy protection strategies”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 34-51, doi: 10.1002/dir.10053.

Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A. and Papadopoulos, T. (2017), “Green supply chain management: theoretical framework and further research directions”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 184-218, doi: 10.1108/BIJ-01-2016-0011.

Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S.J., Papadopoulos, T., Hazen, B., Giannakis, M. and Roubaud, D. (2017b), “Examining the effect of external pressures and organisational culture on shaping performance measurement systems (PMS) for sustainability benchmarking: some empirical findings”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 193, pp. 63-76.

Dubois, S. (1990), “Accuracy of visual estimates of plate waste in the determination of food consumption”, Journal of the American Dietetic Association, Vol. 90 No. 3, pp. 382-387.

Eissa, N.A.M. (2020), “Egypt within the sustainable development goals one and two of the United Nations: overview and recommendations thereof”, Research in World Economy, Vol. 11 No. 5, pp. 420-432, doi: 10.5430/RWE.V11N5P420.

Ekinci, Y. and Riley, M. (2003), “An investigation of self-concept: actual and ideal self-congruence compared in the context of service evaluation”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 201-214, doi: 10.1016/S0969-6989(02)00008-5.

Elhoushy, S. (2022), “To taste not to waste: can exposure to TV cooking shows cultivate food waste reduction?”, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, Vol. 21 No. 4, doi: 10.1002/cb.2026.

Ericksen, M.K. (1997), “Using self-congruity and ideal congruity to predict purchase intention: a European perspective”, Journal of Euromarketing, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 41-56, doi: 10.1300/J037v06n01_04.

Eriksson, M., Persson Osowski, C., Malefors, C., Björkman, J. and Eriksson, E. (2017), “Quantification of food waste in public catering services–A case study from a Swedish municipality”, Waste Management, Vol. 61, pp. 415-422, doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.035.

Evans, D. (2012), “Beyond the throwaway society: ordinary domestic practice and a sociological approach to household food waste”, Sociology, Vol. 46, pp. 41-56, doi: 10.1177/0038038511416150.

Evans, G. and Durant, J. (1995), “The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain”, Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 57-74, doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004.

Fan, L., Ellison, B. and Wilson, N.L.W. (2022), “What Food waste solutions do people support?”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 330, 129907, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129907.

Farr-Wharton, G., Foth, M. and Choi, J.H.-J. (2014), “Identifying factors that promote consumer behaviours causing expired domestic food waste”, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, Vol. 13 No. 6, pp. 393-402.

Florkowski, W.J., Us, A. and Klepacka, A.M. (2018), “Food waste in rural households support for local biogas production in Lubelskie Voivodship (Poland)”, Resource Conservative Recycle, Vol. 136, pp. 46-52.

Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981), “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 39-50, doi: 10.2307/3151312.

Fotopoulos, C. and Krystallis, A. (2002), “Purchasing motives and profile of the Greek organic consumer: a countrywide survey”, British Food Journal, Vol. 104 No. 9, pp. 730-765, doi: 10.1108/00070700210443110.

Francois-Lecompte, A. and Roberts, J.A. (2006), “Developing a measure of socially responsible consumption in France”, Marketing Management Journal, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 55-66, doi: 10.1108/00070700210443110.

Freedman, M.R. and Brochado, C. (2010), “Reducing portion size reduces food intake and plate waste”, Obesity, Vol. 18 No. 9, pp. 1864-1866, doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.480.

Gaskin, J. (2012), “Common method bias using common latent factor [Video]. YouTube”, available at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7zZCBlRXog (accessed 25 October 2021).

George, D. and Mallery, P. (2010), SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 17.0 Update, 10th ed., Allyn & Bacon.

Gong, Y., Chen, C., Tan, Y. and Tang, D. (2023), “How active social network site use affects green consumption: a moderated mediation model”, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 14, 1124025, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1124025.

González-Cutre, D., Sicilia, Á., Moreno, J.A. and Fernández-Balboa, J.M. (2009), “Dispositional flow in physical education: relationships with motivational climate, social goals, and perceived competence”, Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 422-440, doi: 10.1123/jtpe.28.4.422.

Goodman, D., DuPuis, E.M. and Goodman, M.K. (2012), “Alternative food networks: knowledge, practice, and politics alternative food networks: knowledge”, Practice, and Politics, Vol. 9780203804520, pp. 1-308.

Govind, R., Singh, J.J., Garg, N. and D'Silva, S. (2019), “Not walking the walk: how dual attitudes influence behavioral outcomes in ethical consumption”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 155 No. 4, doi: 10.1007/s10551-017-3545-z.

Graham-Rowe, E., Jessop, D.C. and Sparks, P. (2014), “Identifying motivations and barriers to minimising household food waste”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 84, pp. 15-23, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.12.005.

Hair, J.F. Jr, Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. and Anderson, R.E. (2010), Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective, 7th ed., Pearson.

Hamerman, E.J., Rudell, F. and Martins, C.M. (2018), “Factors that predict taking restaurant leftovers: strategies for reducing food waste”, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 94-104.

Hamilton, C., Denniss, R. and Baker, D. (2005), Wasteful Consumption in Australia, The Australia Institute, Canberra.

Hartlieb, S. and Jones, B. (2009), “Humanising business through ethical labeling: progress and paradoxes in the UK”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 88, pp. 583-600, doi: 10.1007/s10551-009-0125-x.

Hattie, J. (2014), Self-concept, Psychology Press, available at: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315802183 (accessed 1 June 2019).

He, H. and Mukherjee, A. (2007), “I am, ergo I shop: does store image congruity explain shopping behaviour of Chinese consumers?”, Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 23 Nos 5-6, pp. 443-460, doi: 10.1362/026725707X212766.

Heesup, H., Yunhi, K. and Eui-Keun, K. (2011), “Cognitive, affective, conative, and action loyalty: testing the impact of inertia”, International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 1008-1019, ISSN 0278-4319, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.03.006.

Holm, L. (2003), “Food health policies and ethics: lay perspectives on functional foods”, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, Vol. 16 No. 6, pp. 531-544, doi: 10.1023/B:JAGE.0000004966.67083.8a.

Huber, F., Eisele, A. and Meyer, F. (2018), “The role of actual, ideal, and ought self-congruence in the consumption of hedonic versus utilitarian brands”, Psychology Mark, Vol. 35 No. 1, pp. 47-63, doi: 10.1002/mar.21070.

Ibrahim, H. and Najjar, F. (2008), “Assessing the effects of self-congruity, attitudes and customer satisfaction on customer behavioural intentions in retail environment”, Marketing Intelligence and Planning, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 207-227, doi: 10.1108/02634500810860638.

Ishak, S. and Zabil, N.F.M. (2012), “Impact of consumer awareness and knowledge to consumer effective behavior”, Asian Social Science, Vol. 8 No. 13, 108, doi: 10.5539/ass.v8n13p108.

Jamal, A. and Al-Marri, M. (2007), “Exploring the effect of self-image congruence and brand preference on satisfaction: the role of expertise”, Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 23 Nos 7-8, pp. 613-629, doi: 10.1362/026725707X2266.

Jamal, Y., Islam, T. and Shahid, Z.A. (2022), “Understanding online shopping hate in social commerce context: antecedents and consequences of psychological reactance”, Kybernetes, Vol. 52 No. 9, pp. 3706-3728, doi: 10.1108/K-11-2021-1093.

Janssens, W., Wijnen, K., De Pelsmacker, P. and Van Kenhove, P. (2008), Marketing Research with SPSS, Pearson Education.

Jiang, Y., Xiao, L., Jalees, T., Naqvi, M.H. and Zaman, S.I. (2018), “Moral and ethical antecedents of attitude toward counterfeit luxury products”, Evidence from Pakistan Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Vol. 54 No. 15, pp. 3519-3538.

Jung, S.E., Shin, Y.H. and Dougherty, R. (2020), “A multi theory–based investigation of college students' underlying beliefs about local food consumption”, Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, Vol. 52 No. 10, pp. 907-917, doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2020.07.002.

Kamble, S.S., Gunasekaran, A., Parekh, H. and Joshi, S. (2019), “Modeling the internet of things adoption barriers in food retail supply chains”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 48, pp. 154-168.

Kantor, L.S., Lipton, K., Manchester, A. and Oliveira, V. (1997), “Estimating and addressing America's food losses”, Food Review, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 2-12.

Kapepula, K.M., Colson, G., Sabri, K. and Thonart, P. (2007), “A multiple criteria analysis for household solid waste management in the urban community of Dakar”, Waste Management, Vol. 27 No. 11, pp. 1690-1705, doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2006.07.009.

Kareklas, I., Carlson, J.R. and Muehling, D.D. (2014), “I eat organic for my benefit and yours: egoistic and altruistic considerations for purchasing organic food and their implications for advertising strategists”, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 43 No. 1, pp. 18-32, doi: 10.1080/00913367.2013.799450.

Karsaklian, E. and Fee, A. (2012), “The motivational roots of international volunteering: a cross-disciplinary framework”, Academy of Management Proceedings, Academy of Management, NY, No. 1, 11382.

Khalid, S., Naseer, A., Shahid, M., Shah, G.M., Ullah, M.I., Waqar, A., Abbas, T., Imran, M. and Rehman, F. (2019), “Assessment of nutritional loss with food waste and factors governing this waste at household level in Pakistan”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 206, pp. 1015-1024, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.138.

Kock, N. (2015), “Common method bias in PLS-SEM: a full collinearity assessment approach”, International Journal of E-Collaboration, Vol. 11, pp. 1-10.

Krystallis, A., Maglaras, G. and Mamalis, S. (2008), “Motivations and cognitive structures of consumers in their purchasing of functional foods”, Food Quality and Preference, Vol. 19 No. 6, pp. 525-538, doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.12.005.

Laila, A., von Massow, M., Bain, M., Parizeau, K. and Haines, J. (2021), “Impact of COVID-19 on food waste behaviour of families: results from household waste composition audits”, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 101188, doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2021.101188.

Lazell, J. (2016), “Consumer food waste behaviour in universities: sharing as a means of prevention”, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, Vol. 15 No. 5, pp. 430-439.

Lee, S.H. and Hyman, M. (2008), “Hedonic/Functional congruity between stores and private label brands”, The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 219-232, doi: 10.2753/MTP1069-6679160303.

Li, X. and Uysal, M. (2016), “An examination of effects of self-concept, destination personality, and SC-DP congruence on tourist behavior”, Travel and Tourism Research Association: Advancing Tourism Research Globally.

Li, Y., Wang, L.-E., Liu, G. and Cheng, S. (2021), “Rural household food waste characteristics and driving factors in China Resources”, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 164, 105209.

Lue, Y.L., Liu, L.Y., Hu, X., Wang, L., Guo, L.L., Gao, S.Y. and Jia, Z.J. (2010), “Characteristics and provenance of dustfall during an unusual floating dust event”, Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 44 No. 29, pp. 3477-3484, doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.06.027.

Makhal, A., Robertson, K., Thyne, M. and Mirosa, M. (2021), “Normalising the “ugly” to reduce food waste: exploring the socialisations that form appearance preferences for fresh fruits and vegetables”, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, Vol. 20 No. 5, pp. 1025-1039.

Mani, V. and Gunasekaran, A. (2018), “Four forces of supply chain social sustainability adoption in emerging economies”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 199, pp. 150-161.

Mani, V., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Dubey, R. and Benjamin, H. (2016), “Supply chain social sustainability for developing nations: evidence from India”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 111, pp. 42-52.

Marra, F. (2014), “Raising food waste awareness in Japan”, available at: http://foodtank.com/news/2014/02/raising-food-waste-awareness-in-japan (accessed 14 February 2015).

Mathews, C. (2012), Towards a Framework for Sustainable Consumption in China (Doctoral Dissertation, Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College, London.

Mattar, L., Abiad, M.G., Chalak, A., Diab, M. and Hassan, H. (2018), “Attitudes and behaviors shaping household food waste generation: lessons from Lebanon”, Journal of Cleaning Production, Vol. 198, pp. 1219-1223.

Mehra, A., Rajput, S. and Paul, J. (2022), “Determinants of adoption of latest version smartphones: theory and evidence”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 175, 121410, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121410.

Miao, M., Jalees, T., Qabool, S. and Zaman, S.I. (2019), “The effects of personality, culture and store stimuli on impulsive buying behavior: evidence from emerging market of Pakistan Asia”, Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 188-204.

Min, B. and Wakslak, C. (2022), “The effects of self-awareness on consumer evaluation of experiential creation”, International Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 46 No. 6, pp. 2333-2350, doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12789.

Min, S., Wang, X. and Yu, X. (2020), “Does dietary knowledge affect household food waste in the developing economy of China?”, Food Policy, 101896.

Mishra, D., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T. and Dubey, R. (2018), “Supply chain performance measures and metrics: a bibliometric study”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 932-967, doi: 10.1108/BIJ-08-2017-0224.

Mitra, S., Mukhopadhyay, D.K., Sarkar, A.P. and Saha, I. (2019), “Are household food security, nutrient adequacy, and childhood nutrition clustered together? A cross-sectional study in Bankura”, West Bengal Indian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 63 No. 3, pp. 203-208.

Mohr, L.A., Webb, D.J. and Harris, K.E. (2001), “Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior”, Journal of Consumer Affairs, Vol. 35 No. 1, pp. 45-72, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6606.2001.tb00102.x.

Moisander, J. (2007), “Motivational complexity of green consumerism”, International Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 404-409, doi: 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2007.00586.x.

Multlu, N. (2007), Consumer Attitude and Behaviour towards Organic Food: Cross-Cultural Study of Turkey and Germany, University of Hohenheim.

Munger, K. and Harris, S.J. (1989), “Effects of an observer on handwashing in a public restroom”, Perceptual and Motor Skills, Vol. 69, pp. 733-734.

Munir, K. (2022), “Sustainable food waste management strategies by applying practice theory in hospitality and food services- a systematic literature review”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 331, 129991, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129991.

Nahman, A., De Lange, W., Oelofse, S. and Godfrey, L. (2012), “The costs of household food waste in South Africa”, Waste Management, Vol. 32 No. 11, pp. 2147-2153, doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.04.012.

Osgood, C.E. and Tannenbaum, P.H. (1955), “The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change”, Psychological Review, Vol. 62 No. 1, 42, doi: 10.1037/h0048153.

Padgett, R.D. (2011), “The effects of the first year of college on undergraduates’ development of altruistic and socially responsible behavior”, Ph.D. Dissertation thesis - University of Iowa.

Papadopoulos, T., Gunasekaran, A., Dubey, R., Altay, N., Childe, S.J. and Fosso-Wamba, S. (2017), “The role of Big Data in explaining disaster resilience in supply chains for sustainability”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 142, pp. 1108-1118.

Parizeau, K., von Massow, M. and Martin, R. (2015), “Household-level dynamics of food waste production and related beliefs, attitudes, and behaviours in Guelph Ontario”, Waste Management, Vol. 35 No. 2015, pp. 207-217, doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.019.

Pearson, D., Minehan, M. and Wakefield-Rann, R. (2013), “Food waste in Australian households: why does it occur?”, Australia Pacific Journal of Regression Food Studies, Vol. 3, pp. 118-132.

Pieters, R. (2013), “Bidirectional dynamics of materialism and loneliness: not just a vicious cycle”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 40 No. 4, pp. 615-631, doi: 10.1086/671564.

Pirani, S.I. and Arafat, H.A. (2016), “Reduction of food waste generation in the hospitality industry”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 132, pp. 129-145, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.146.

Plewa, C. and Palmer, K. (2014), “Self-congruence theory: towards a greater understanding of the global and malleable selves in a sports specific consumption context”, International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 26-39, doi: 10.1108/IJSMS-15-04-2014-B004.

Qi, D., Lai, W. and Roe, B.E. (2020), “Food waste declined more in rural Chinese households with livestock”, Food Policy, Vol. 98, pp. 1-14, 101893.

Quested, T. and Johnson, H. (2009), Household Food and Drink Waste in the UK, WRAP, Banbury.

Quested, T.E., Marsh, E., Stunell, D. and Parry, A.D. (2013), “Spaghetti soup: the complex world of food waste behaviours”, Resource Conservative Recycle, Vol. 79, pp. 43-51.

Rabiei, L., Sharifirad, G.R. and Hassanzadeh, A. (2013), “Understanding the relationship between nutritional knowledge, self-efficacy, and self-concept of high-school students suffering from overweight”, Journal of Education and Health Promotion, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 2-39, doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.115834.

Ramanathan, U., Gunasekaran, A. and Subramanian, N. (2011), “Supply chain collaboration performance metrics: a conceptual framework”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 18 No. 6, pp. 856-872, doi: 10.1108/14635771111180734.

Rasool, S., Shakur, M.M.A., Mughal, Y.H. and Awang, Z. (2019), “Validating a measure for altruistic self towards the responsible plate food consumption: a mix method Approach”, International Journal of Business and Society, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 211-228.

Reisch, L.A., Sunstein, C.R., Andor, M.A., Doebbe, F.C., Meier, J. and Haddaway, N.R. (2021), “Mitigating climate change via food consumption and food waste: a systematic map of behavioral interventions”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 279, 123717, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123717.

Rensbury, J.V. (2003), “The relationship between self-concept, self-efficacy, emotional state, Weight Perception and Food choice: Implications for Markers Based on a Generation Y Sample”, (UnpublishedMaster Thesis), Stellenbosch University.

Roe, B.E., Qi, D., Apolzan, J.W. and Martin, C.K. (2020), “Selection, intake, and plate waste patterns of leftover food items among U.S. consumers”, A Pilot Study PLoS One, Vol. 15, 0238050.

Rolls, B.J., Roe, L.S., Halverson, K.H. and Meengs, J.S. (2007), “Using a smaller plate did not reduce energy intake at meals”, Appetite, Vol. 49 No. 3, pp. 652-660, doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2007.04.005.

Rortveit, A.W. and Olsen, S.O. (2007 In press), “The role of consideration set size in explaining fish consumption”, Appetite, Vol. 49 No. 1, pp. 214-222, doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2007.02.005.

Rozin, P., Bauer, R. and Catanese, D. (2003), “Food and life, pleasure and worry, among American college students: gender differences and regional similarities”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 85 No. 1, p. 132.

Rozin, P., Fischler, C., Imada, S., Sarubin, A. and Wrzesniewski, A. (1999), “Attitude to food and the role of food in life in the USA, Japan, Flemish Belgium and France: possible implications for the diet-health debate”, Appetite, Vol. 33, pp. 163-180.

Savary, S., Akter, S., Almekinders, C., Harris, J., Korsten, L., Rötter, R., Waddington, S. and Watson, D. (2020), “Mapping disruption and resilience mechanisms in food systems”, Food Security, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 695-717.

Schafer, E., Schafer, R.B., Kerth, P.M. and Bose, J. (1999), “Self esteem and fruit and vegetable intake in women and men”, Journal of Nutrition Education Behavior, Vol. 31, pp. 153-160.

Schwartz, S.H. (1977), “Normative Influences on Altruism”, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 10, pp. 221-279.

Shaw, D. and Newholm, T. (2002), “Voluntary simplicity and the ethics of consumption”, Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 167-185, doi: 10.1002/mar.10008.

Shiu, E., Pervan, S.J., Bove, L.L. and Beatty, S.E. (2011), “Reflections on discriminant validity: reexamining the Bove et al. (2009) findings”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 64 No. 5, pp. 497-500, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.04.004.

Sigurðardóttir, S. (2017), “Predicting household food waste reduction: an exploratory study comparing and contrasting the theory of planned behavior and value belief norm theory”, Master thesis, available at: http://hdl.handle.net/1946/26754.

Silvennoinen, K., Heikkilä, L., Katajajuuri, J.-M. and Reinikainen, A. (2015), “Food waste volume and origin: case studies in the Finnish food service sector”, Waste Management, Vol. 46, pp. 140-145, doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.09.010.

Sirgy, M.J. (2018), “Self-congruity theory in consumer behavior: a little history”, Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Vol. 28, pp. 197-207.

Sirgy, M.J., Grewal, D., Mangleburg, T., Park, J., Chon, K., Claiborne, C.B., Johar, J.S. and Berkman, H. (1997), “Assessing the predictive validity of two methods of measuring self-image congruence”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 229-241, doi: 10.1177/0092070397253004.

Song, G.B., Semakula, H.M. and Fullana-i-Palmer, P. (2018), “Chinese household food waste and its' climatic burden driven by urbanisation: a Bayesian Belief Network modelling for reduction possibilities in the context of global efforts”, Journal of Cleaning Production, Vol. 202, pp. 916-924.

Spehr, K. and Curnow, R. (2011), “Are you objectives really about behaviour change? Or are they really about knowledge and attitudes”, available at: http://www.communitychange.com.au (accessed 7 December 2015).

Sudbury-Riley, L. and Kohlbacher, F. (2016), “Ethically minded consumer behavior: scale review, development, and validation”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 69 No. 8, pp. 2697-2710, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.005.

Tapia-Fonllem, C., Corral-Verdugo, V., Fraijo-Sing, B. and Durón-Ramos, M. (2013), “Assessing sustainable behavior and its correlates: a measure of pro-ecological, frugal, altruistic and equitable actions”, Sustainability, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 711-723, doi: 10.3390/su502071.

Thapa Karki, S., Bennett, A.C.T. and Mishra, J.L. (2021), “Reducing food waste and food insecurity in the UK: the architecture of surplus food distribution supply chain in addressing the sustainable development goals (Goal 2 and Goal 12.3) at a city level”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 93, pp. 563-577, doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.09.019.

Thi, N.B.D., Kumar, G. and Lin, C.-Y. (2015), “An overview of food waste management in developing countries: current status and future perspective”, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 157, pp. 220-229, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.022.

Thyberg, K.L. and Tonjes, D.J. (2016), “Drivers of food waste and their implications for sustainable policy development Resources”, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 106, pp. 110-123.

Triandis, H.C. (1971), Attitude and Attitude Change, Wiley, New York.

Tsai, W.-C., Chen, X. and Yang, C. (2020), “Consumer food waste behavior among emerging adults: evidence from China”, Foods, Vol. 9 No. 7, 961, doi: 10.3390/foods9070961.

United Nations Environment Programme (2021), Food Waste Index Report 2021, United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi.

Vogel, T. and Wanke, M. (2016), Attitudes and Attitude Change, Psychology Press, London.

Wang, H., Ma, B., Cudjoe, D., Farrukh, M. and Bai, R. (2023), “What influences students' food waste behaviour in campus canteens?”, British Food Journal, Vol. 125 No. 2, pp. 381-395, doi: 10.1108/BFJ-10-2021-1103.

Wansink, B. (2018), “Household food waste solutions for behavioral economists and marketers”, Journal of Food Products Marketing, Vol. 24 No. 5, pp. 500-521, doi: 10.1080/10454446.2018.1472694.

WasteMinz (2014), National Food Waste Prevention Study, WasteMinz, Auckland, New Zealand, available at: http://www.wasteminz.org.nz/sector-groups/behaviour-change/national-food-waste-prevention-project/ (accessed 23 December 2015).

Webb, P., Coates, J., Frongillo, E.A., Rogers, B.L., Swindale, A. and Bilinsky, P. (2006), “Measuring household food insecurity: why it's so important and yet so difficult to do”, Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 136 No. 5, pp. 1404-1408.

Wilson, D.C. (1996), “Stick or carrot? The use of policy measures to move waste management up the hierarchy”, Waste Management Research, Vol. 14 No. 14, pp. 385-398.

Wolfinbarger, M. and Gilly, M.C. (2003), “eTailQ: dimensionalizing, measuring and predicting etail quality”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 79 No. 3, pp. 183-198.

Zanoli, R. and Naspetti, S. (2002), “Consumer motivations in the purchase of organic food: a means-end approach”, British Food Journal, Vol. 104 No. 8, pp. 643-653, doi: 10.1108/00070700210425930.

Zhang, K.Z. and Benyoucef, M. (2016), “Consumer behavior in social commerce: a literature review”, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 86, pp. 95-108, doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2016.04.001.

Zhang, C., Gunasekaran, A. and Wang, W.Y.C. (2015), “A comprehensive model for supply chain integration”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 22 No. 6, pp. 1141-1157, doi: 10.1108/BIJ-05-2013-0060.

Zhang, J., Ye, H., Bhatt, S., Jeong, H., Deutsch, J., Ayaz, H. and Suri, R. (2021), “Addressing food waste: how to position upcycled foods to different generations”, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 242-250.

Acknowledgements

Since acceptance of this article, the following author has updated his affiliation: Shahid Rasool is at the Department of Management and Marketing, Westminster International University in Tashkent, Uzbekistan and Azman Hashim International Business School, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Corresponding author

Roberto Cerchione can be contacted at: roberto.cerchione@uniparthenope.it

Related articles