Alleanza Nazionale (AN)

, 119–120

Alliance for Germany (AfD)

, 104, 107, 118, 149–150

Ambivalent familialism

, 118–119

Associate managers (AMs)

, 37

Attitudes concerning gender roles inside and outside households

authoritarian/conservative

, 78

libertarian

, 78

Baby bonus

, 57–58

Berlusconi’s FI

, 119–120

Biased toward explicit familialism

, 113

Blome, Agnes

, 2, 4, 31, 111–112, 119

Blue-collar workers (BCs)

, 86–88

Bonoli, Giuliano

, 8, 13–14, 31, 37, 118

British Conservative Party

, 48

Cash transfers

, 15, 49, 72–73, 148–149

Cash-for-care (CFC)

, 57

Child benefit

, 15–16, 23, 131–132

Childcare provision

, 72

market-oriented

, 72

universal

, 38

Childcare/ECEC support to

, 60–61

Choice strategy

, 20–21

Christian democratic and conservative parties

, 29–30

Christian Democratic Union/Christian Social Union (CDU-CSU)

, 6, 48, 55, 57

in 1990s

, 113–114

in 2000s

, 114–116

in 2010s

, 116–118

family policy agenda in Fordist Era

, 112–113

Comparative Manifesto Project (CMP)

, 50

Content analysis of party manifestos

, 55

de-familialization dimension

, 60–65

familialization dimension

, 55–60

Coordinated market economies (CMEs)

, 39

Cordon sanitaire strategy

, 149

Cultural goal

, 26

Daddy quota

, 23

Daly, Mary

, 2, 17, 36

De-commodification

, 17

De-familialism

, 18, 25

De-familialization

, 16–17, 19, 21

Germany

, 60–62

Italy

, 62

Sweden

, 62–64

UK

, 64–65

De-familializing policy instruments

, 22

Democratic Party (PD)

, 107

Democratici di Sinistra (DS)

, 122

Democrazia Cristiana (DC)

, 119

Dual-earner family model

, 1–2, 27

Duvander, Ann-Zofie

, 63, 125, 128–129

Early childhood education and care (ECEC)

, 2, 15–16, 37, 60–61, 111–112, 142

Earner/carer family model

, 2, 20–21, 27

Economic and demographic context

, 41–42, 98, 101

“Economic” goal

, 25–26

Ellingsæter, Anne Lise

, 2, 58, 63, 128

ElterngeldPlus

, 71

Employers

, 38–39, 90, 93

Esping-Andersen, Gøsta

, 1, 17–19, 22, 41

European Value Survey (EVS)

, 104–107

Explicit familialism

, 18, 24

Explicit family policy

, 15

Familialism

, 4

by default

, 18–19

Familialization

, 16–17, 19, 21

Germany

, 55–57

Italy

, 57–58

Sweden

, 58–59

UK

, 59–60

Familializing policy instruments

, 22

Family allowances

, 19–20, 72, 94, 96, 113, 119

Family models

, 4, 27, 51–52

dual-earner family model

, 27

earner/carer family model

, 27

Germany

, 68–71

Italy

, 71–72

male breadwinner family model

, 27

primary earner model

, 27

Sweden

, 72–73

UK

, 73–74

Family policy

, 14–16

multifaceted nature

, 2–3

politics

, 3–4, 21–27

profiles

, 16, 19, 21

Family policy drivers

, 33

institutional and contextual drivers

, 39–42

political drivers

, 42–45

sociocultural drivers

, 34–39

Family policy goals

cultural goals

, 72

economic goals

, 68

social investment

, 71

Female employment

, 20, 22–23, 62

Female labor force skills

general high

, 115

general low

, 113

Female political representation

, 42, 44, 101, 103

Female social stratification

, 37–38

Ferragina, Emanuele

, 1, 3, 20–21, 52

Fleckenstein, Timo

, 2, 38, 56–57, 115, 127

Fordist era, family policy and politics in

, 111, 113, 118, 120, 124, 126, 130, 132

Free Democratic Party (FDP)

, 104, 149

Gender

, 37–38, 86, 90

arrangements in households

, 26

equality

, 26

gap

, 78–86

Häusermann, Silja

, 104

Implicit familialism

, 18, 24

Implicit family policy

, 15

“Incomplete” revolution

, 1–2

Inglehart, Robert

, 9–10, 34–36

Institutional and contextual drivers

, 7, 39, 42, 94, 101

economic and demographic context

, 41–42, 98, 101

in Germany

, 94–96

in Italy

, 94–96

policy legacies

, 40–41, 94, 98

in Sweden

, 94–96

in UK

, 94–96

Italian Go Italy (FI)

, 48

Korpi, Walter

, 1, 9–10, 18, 20, 36

Labor Party

, 108–109

Leave

daddy quotas

, 23, 50

long leave

, 50

low-paid leave

, 50

maternity leave

, 50

paternity leave

, 50

Leitner, Sigrid

, 1, 4, 8, 18–19, 22, 24, 116

Lewis, Jane

, 1–2, 19–21, 65, 131, 135

Liberal Democrats (LibDem)

, 108–109

Liberal market economies (LMEs)

, 39

Lister, Ruth

, 3, 8, 17–18, 31, 59, 131–132, 134

M’s family agenda in Fordist era

, 125–126

Mainstream Left parties

, 3

Mainstream Right

, 29–30, 36

analyzing

, 49–52

case selection

, 47–49

combined family policy positions

, 65–68

comparative summary of empirical findings

, 141–146

current scenarios and future developments

, 148–151

explaining

, 52–53, 140–141

family policy agendas

, 47, 111, 139, 141

family policy readaptation

, 36

Germany

, 67, 111, 118

incentives

, 39

investigating parties’ family policy agendas in post-Fordist era

, 139–140

Italy

, 67, 118, 124

parties

, 3–4, 7

Sweden

, 67–68, 124, 130

UK

, 68, 130, 136

Male breadwinner family model

, 1, 20–21, 27

archetype of

, 111–112

British version of

, 130–131

Mixed-method strategy

, 52–53

“Modern” gender gap

, 34–36

Money transfers

, 15–16

Multidimensional space of conflict around family policy

, 22–25

Multifaceted nature of family policy

, 2–3

Naumann, Ingela K.

, 25, 31, 35, 104, 111, 115, 124–125

New Left parties

, 35

Northern League (LN)

, 107

OECD Social Protection and Well-being Database (OECD-SOCX)

, 52

One-and-half earner model

, 2

Optional familialism

, 18, 25, 113

Part-time work

, 26, 50

Partito Comunista Italiano (PCI)

, 119

Partito Socialista Italiano (PSI)

, 119–120

Party competition

, 44–45, 104, 109

in Germany

, 104

in Italy

, 107

in Sweden

, 102

in UK

, 108–109

Party manifestos, analysis of

CDU/CSU

, 55–57

FI

, 57–58

M

, 58–59

Tories

, 59–60

Pavolini, Emmanuele

, 3, 9–10, 34–35, 37, 48, 120, 132–133

Policy goals

, 4, 25–26

Germany

, 68–71

Italy

, 71–72

Sweden

, 72–73

UK

, 73–74

Policy instruments

, 4

Policy legacies

, 40–41, 94, 98

Germany

, 94–96

Italy

, 97

Sweden

, 94–96

UK

, 94–96

Political drivers

, 7, 42, 45, 101, 109

female political representation

, 42, 44, 101, 103

Germany

, 102

Italy

, 102

Sweden

, 102

UK

, 102

Politics of presence

, 42–43

Post-Fordist constituency

, 37–39

Post-Fordist female social groups

female (associate) managers (AMs)

, 37

female blue collar workers

, 86–88

female small business owners (SBOs)

, 37

female socio-cultural professionals (SCPs)

, 37–38

female traditional bourgeoisie (TB)

, 37

Postmaterialist values

, 34–36

Power resource theory (PRT)

, 3, 29

Primary earner model

, 27

Quantitative-oriented comparative analysis

, 77

institutional and contextual drivers

, 94–101

political drivers

, 101–109

sociocultural drivers

, 77–93

Radical right parties (RRPs)

, 44–45

Red-Green coalition government

, 116

Saraceno, Chiara

, 1, 15, 18–19, 119

Seeleib-Kaiser, Martin

, 1–2, 30, 134

Small and medium enterprises (SMEs)

, 90, 92, 143–144

Small business owners (SBOs)

, 37

Social Democratic Party (SPD)

, 35, 104, 124, 149

Social investment (SI)

, 71

for underage children

, 26

Social modernization

, 34–36

Social stratification

, 37–38, 86, 90

Societal modernization

, 78–86

Sociocultural disincentive

, 113–114

Sociocultural drivers

, 7, 34, 39, 77, 93

employers

, 90–93

Germany

, 78

Italy

, 78

post-Fordist constituency

, 37–39

social stratification and gender

, 86–90

societal modernization and gender gap

, 78–86

Sweden

, 78

UK

, 78

Sociocultural professionals (SCPs)

, 37–38, 116–117

Stratified defamilialization

, 37

Sure Start

, 65–67

Swedish Democrats (SD)

, 58–59, 107–108

Swedish Moderate Party (M)

, 48

Swedish Social Democratic Party (SAP)

, 107–108

Swedish Trade Union Confederation

, 124

Time to care

, 15–16

Tories’ agenda in Fordist era

, 131–132

Traditional bourgeoise (TB)

, 37

Traditional gender gap

, 35

United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP)

, 108–109, 136

Van Kersbergen, Kees

, 3, 29–30, 135

Varieties of Capitalism (VoC)

, 39

Varieties of familialism

, 18, 22–23

de-familialism

, 18

explicit familialism

, 18

implicit familialism

, 18

optional familialism

, 18

Weak male breadwinner family model

, 124–125