Prelims

Susana Tosca (University of Southern Denmark, Denmark)

Sameness and Repetition in Contemporary Media Culture

ISBN: 978-1-80455-955-0, eISBN: 978-1-80455-952-9

Publication date: 2 August 2023

Citation

Tosca, S. (2023), "Prelims", Sameness and Repetition in Contemporary Media Culture, Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. i-ix. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80455-952-920231009

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023 Susana Tosca. Published by Emerald Publishing Limited

License

This work is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of these works (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode.


Half Title Page

Sameness and Repetition in Contemporary Media Culture

Endorsements

What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun.

Ecclesiastes 1:9

Modern life is such that, confronted with the most mechanical, the most stereotypical repetitions, inside and outside ourselves, we endlessly extract from them little differences, variations and modifications. Conversely, secret, disguised and hidden repetitions, animated by the perpetual displacement of a difference, restore bare, mechanical and stereotypical repetitions, within and without us. In simulacra, repetition already plays upon repetitions, and difference already plays upon differences.

Deleuze, Difference and Repetition.

Repetition's love is in truth the only happy love. Like recollection's love, it does not have the restlessness of hope, the uneasy adventurousness of discovery, but neither does it have the sadness of recollection – it has the blissful security of the moment. Hope is a new garment, stiff and starched and lustrous, but it has never been tried on, and therefore one does not know how becoming it will be or how it will fit. Recollection is a discarded garment that does not fit, however beautiful it is, for one has outgrown it. Repetition is an indestructible garment that fits closely and tenderly, neither binds nor sags.

Kierkegaard, Repetition.

Culture today is infecting everything with sameness.

Adorno & Horkheimer, The Culture Industry.

Title Page

Sameness and Repetition in Contemporary Media Culture

by

Susana Tosca

University of Southern Denmark, Denmark

This work has been possible thanks to the fellowship granted by the

United Kingdom – North America – Japan – India – Malaysia – China

Copyright Page

Emerald Publishing Limited

Howard House, Wagon Lane, Bingley BD16 1WA, UK

First edition 2023

Copyright © 2023 Susana Tosca.

Published by Emerald Publishing Limited.

This work is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence.

Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of these works (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode.

The e-book edition of this title is Open Access and is freely available to read online.

British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data

A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library

ISBN: 978-1-80455-955-0 (Print)

ISBN: 978-1-80455-952-9 (Online)

ISBN: 978-1-80455-954-3 (Epub)

Acknowledgements

It is perhaps a very fitting coincidence that I embarked on this project in the autumn of 2020, the year of the pandemic, the lockouts and the crushing routines. No other year has my life been so repetitive, so limited, so monotonous. All research trips were cancelled, physical presence on campus greatly reduced and for many months, the only variation came from looking at the sky and hoping for better weather, as we were in lockdown together with the rest of the world. Those should have been good conditions for writing about precisely repetition, but the various preoccupations, the home-schooling of three children and the need to move all sociality online made for bad writing companions. The project was stalled, restarted, stalled… again and again, so it ended up stretching through the whole pandemic, and a bit beyond.

This book has been underway for much longer than that, though, as it pulls together a lot of the threads that I had loosely spun in my previous research about digital narratives, computer games, transmediality and online cultures. Moreover, I have sneaked in a lot of the readings and aesthetic experiences which have formed me since my childhood, so the book is also a cultural biography of sorts. Like the final scene of a good old murder mystery, where the detective has gathered everybody in the library for the final reveal, the plot finally makes sense: everything is connected by repetition.

At the same time, repetition is a dangerous topic. On the one hand, everybody can see the point of such a project, there is repetition everywhere! When I told people about the project, all would eagerly suggest examples of repetitive experiences and practices from their own media consumption, pointing to the many ways in which repetition made aesthetic sense in their favourite art forms: painting, music, literature…. There was certainly no shortage of cases and approaches. On the other hand, if repetition and sameness are everywhere, it is very hard to set a reasonable scope for the book. Repetition is a feature of life itself, where organisms reproduce and develop similar traits; a part of culture, as objects are formed according to the patterns and rules established through the centuries; an aesthetic issue, as formal repetition exists across all modalities and media platforms; a key to understanding algorithms and computers…. Actually, it is also at the core of our idea of how human thought and understanding work, so it can hardly get more fundamental. With so many dimensions to it, the discussion can quickly become too abstract, too disperse, too metaphoric and superficial to be of any use, and yet, someone believed in this idea.

I thank the Carlsberg Foundation in Denmark for the generous monograph fellowship which allowed me to immerse myself in the necessary study that such a writing project requires. In the 20 odd years that have passed since I obtained my doctoral degree, this has been the first chance I have had to fully dedicate myself to scholarship. I had all but forgotten the joys of sitting long hours at libraries (even if mostly electronic this time), finding treasures in the writings of others and building up a long argument of my own. The profession of academic has become a quantified individual sport where we are measured and weighed constantly: the credits we teach, the number of students we supervise, the grant money we bring in, the publications we produce and how high our citation index is. Grants like this cannot be praised enough, for they give us time to stop, to think, to produce slow knowledge and to involve a community of peers. Without it, I would not have had the space and energy to embark on such an exploratory study, where I propose that paying attention to the aesthetics of repetition and sameness can show us something valuable about our world. I am of course not the first to do something like this. Others before me have proposed similarly open, associative approaches, writing about topics such as lines, clouds or stuff, among other risky subjects, revealing unexpected connections and insight. 1 But these are the kind of projects that do not fit peer-reviewed journals or narrow discipline boundaries.

A lot of people have helped me along the way, knowingly and unknowingly. I would like to thank my former colleagues at the Department of Communication and Arts at Roskilde University, specially my research group, Audiences and Mediated Life for constructive dialogue, challenging discussions and open doors and hearts during my 5 years in their company: David Mathieu, Kim Schrøder, Lene Bull Christiansen, Jannie Møller Hartley, Fabian Holt, Chris Peters, Josephine Lehaff, Anja Mølle Lindelof, Troels Fibæk Bertel, Rasmus Rex Pedersen, Sander Schwartz, Martina Skrubbeltrang Mahnke, Kristian Møller, Louise Yung Nielsen, Leif Hemming Pedersen, Daniel Bach, Lotte Bornemann Petersen, Tobias Raun, Niklas Alexander Chimirri, Morten Sivertsen, Julie Vulpius and Norbert Wildermuth. But also Rikke Andreassen, Louise Philips, Lisbeth Frølunde, Eva Mayerhöffer and Sanne Knudsen, among many others.

I want to name a few brilliant friends who generously used their time to read my drafts for this project at various stages of disarray. Annette Markham, for introducing me to new recursive methodologies, for talking about timeless loops and making a bridge from Australia to Denmark. Torill Mortensen, for sharp comments to half-baked texts and providing a cosy writing refuge at her Copenhagen apartment. Lisbeth Klastrup, for all the years of thinking together about and around transmedial worlds; I have never had a conversation with her without becoming wiser. Pille Pruulmann Vengerfeldt, for her sharpness and energy, for inspiring me to systematically record my encounters with the algorithms and for showing me BookBub. Jesper Juul, for seeing the disruptive potential of repetition, encouraging me to break free from the boring journal article-writing style and helping make my points clearer. Maria Grajdian, for the good discussions and sharp academic eye. Víctor Navarro Remesal, for his generous brain that can always spot fruitful connections and for reminding me of all the obscure games that repeat, loop and time-jump. Joleen Bloom, for her inspiring assertiveness, her gentle criticism and assistance with all things Japanese. Philip Prager, for all the playful connections to creativity research and for introducing me to Elsa von Freytag-Loringhoven. Liz Evans, for illuminating my text with her clarity and helping me never to forget the link between producers and audience, our business is not only about meanings. Rasmus Rex Pedersen, for sharing his knowledge so generously and making my ideas better than they were to begin with. Connie Svabo, for showing me the way in the academic career and a sharp structural eye that can bring the best out in any text. Beatriz Pérez Zapata, for a clear editing mind and always finding the best way to say things without them hurting at all.

Last but not least my family: Martin, Elena, Lucas and Clara, who have put up with an absent-minded wife and mother, chained to her desk for days on end with her noise cancelling headphones on. They have supported me, cheered me on, cleaned, cooked, washed, walked the dog and tiptoed around my office as much as they could so I would finish the damn writing. I have learned about repetition and sameness from them too, with their ever-repeating instrument practice, their contagious enthusiasm about new media forms, our marathon sessions of re-watching favourite movies and series and their patience with my asking the same thing five times again. I am fortunate to spend every day with you.

The research for this book was funded by the Carlsberg Foundation.

1

I'm referring to the wonderful books: Lines (Ingold 2007), Marvelous Clouds (Peters 2015) and Stuff (Miller 2010). If this book could be half as inspiring as theirs, I would be very satisfied.