Index
Giulia Romano
(University of Pisa, Italy)
Claudio Marciano
(University of Turin, Italy)
Maria Silvia Fiorelli
(University of Pisa, Italy)
Best Practices in Urban Solid Waste Management
ISBN: 978-1-80043-889-7, eISBN: 978-1-80043-888-0
Publication date: 12 July 2021
This content is currently only available as a PDF
Citation
Romano, G., Marciano, C. and Fiorelli, M.S. (2021), "Index", Best Practices in Urban Solid Waste Management, Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 151-157. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80043-888-020211017
Publisher
:Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2021 by Emerald Publishing Limited
INDEX
A2A
, 72
Age
, 133
2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development of United Nations
, 12
Alea Ambiente
, 84
Alessio Ciacci
, 59
6AIka Future Circular Economy Hubs in Finland project (CircHubs)
, 30–31
AMSA
, 55
ANCI-CONAI National Framework Agreement
, 74
ASCIT
, 59, 69
SpA in Capannori Municipality
, 41, 69, 106
Associative process
, 104
Automation
, 50
Berliner Stadtreinigungsbetriebe (BSR)
, 69
Best practices in urban waste management
, 3
Better Industrial Design
, 39–40, 44
Biological waste
, 111
Biomass
, 111
Board Composition
, 75
Board of directors
, 66, 74, 82
Danish principles of good governance for utilities owned by municipalities
, 80
good practices in OECD countries
, 75
Boardroom efficiency
, 75
Capannori Municipality
, 58–59
Case studies of urban waste management operators
, 3, 5
Cerro Maggiore landfill
, 55
Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
, 66
Circular economy
, 1–3, 51
approach
, 27, 36, 113
example of Contarina SpA
, 110
framework
, 8
good waste management for Voka Snaga Ljubljana
, 32
innovative solutions for circular economy in Ljubljana
, 31
in strategies and performance measurement
, 98
Circular Economy Action Plan
, 96
Circular waste cycle
, 51–53
Citizens
, 114, 133
Collaborative networks, good practices and
, 57–60
Collective responsibility
, 115
Comitato Interministeriale dei Prezzi (CIP6)
, 51–52
Communication
, 51–52, 120
and education plans
, 44
staff members
, 120
and training in Helsinki area
, 121
Composting
, 37–39
solution
, 21
of waste
, 22
Consortia
, 74
of municipalities
, 65
Contarina
, 57–58
circular economy example of
, 110
framework
, 115–116
model
, 115
SpA
, 85, 109
Waste Management Academy
, 122
Cooperation Agreement
, 58
Corporate governance
, 3
experience of LIPOR in Portugal
, 66
rules
, 71, 74, 79, 82, 132
“Corruption Risk and Related Offences Management Plan”
, 66
Cultural hegemony
, 46–48
Cutting-edge waste firms
, 120
DACCAPO Reuse Center
, 41
Danish principles of good governance for utilities owned by municipalities
, 80
DANVA
, 79–80
Data availability
, 117
Decision-makers
, 11
Direct public management
, 73
Divers data collection methods
, 4–5
Door-to-door collection systems
, 37–39, 44, 52
Door-to-door or street bins
, 119
Drinking water provision
, 96
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA)
, 100
Economic incentives
, 39–40
Economic prosperity
, 96
Education and Environmental Intervention Program
, 98
EFFECORTA store
, 43
Effective communication formula
, 52
Efficiency in urban waste management provision
, 94–95
Electrical and Electronic Equipment Recovery Centers network (CREW)
, 98
Emancipation
, 50
Energy production
, 51
Enlargement process
, 12
of European Union
, 13
Environmental accounting principles
, 96
Environmental protection
, 96
Enzo Favoino
, 7
ERICA
, 60–62
ERSAR
, 99
Europe
incineration of domestically generated waste
, 21
municipal waste generation
, 14–17
municipal waste treatment in EU-28
, 22
urban waste management in
, 9–25
European Commission
, 2
European Environmental Agency
, 11
European firms
, 2
European Green Deal
, 31–33
European Investment Bank
, 3, 36
European policymakers
, 123
European Union (EU)
, 1, 9, 50, 64, 94, 104, 132
sustainable product policy framework
, 31
waste laws
, 124
Financial institutions
, 3
Finland
HSY in
, 64–65
landfill disposal of waste in
, 25
Formia Rifiuti Zero Srl. (FRZ)
, 88, 112
Gender
, 133
Genealogy
, 46, 48
“Get–produce–use–throw” approach
, 27–29
Global Alliance Against Incinerators (GAIA)
, 52–53
Good practices and collaborative networks
, 57–60
Good public services
, 1
Good waste management
, 3
for Voka Snaga Ljubljana
, 32
Grassroots movement
, 59–60
Greater Porto
, 65
Green supply chains
, 51–52
Gross domestic product (GDP)
, 1–2
Hazardous waste
, 118
Helsinki Region Environmental Services Authority (HSY)
, 25, 28, 64–65, 118
communication and training in Helsinki area
, 121
Petra Waste Benchmarking in Helsinki
, 119
residents’ waste management in
, 118
In-house providers
, 117
In-house provision of local public services
, 130
Incineration, municipal waste treatment by
, 25
Incinerators
, 49
Individual responsibility
, 115
Induction programs
, 75
Informants
, 4
Innovation
, 104, 114, 131, 134–135
at LIPOR
, 113
RCERO Ljubljana
, 111
relevance of waste treatment plants today
, 112
in service organization and tariff setting
, 106
in waste management through collaboration and knowledge sharing
, 110
Institutional actors
, 30
Institutionalized public–private partnership
, 71
Interim landfills
, 40
International Solid Waste Association
, 50
Investment
, 132
Italian corporate governance code
, 72
Italian examples of costs impact
, 112
Italian National Anti-Corruption Authority (ANAC)
, 117
Italian waste management
, 3
Italy
good practices and collaborative networks
, 57–60
Milan
, 54–57
National Packaging Consortium in
, 74
social innovation networks
, 60–62
zero waste in
, 53, 60, 62
Key performance indicators (KPIs)
, 99
Knowledge exchange processes
, 46, 54
Knowledge sharing
, 123, 127, 131, 134, 136
approach
, 132
at macro-, meso-, and microlevels
, 125
Landfill(ing)
, 44
disposal
, 49
landfilled municipal waste
, 23–25
rate
, 19
of waste
, 21
Lavazza
, 59
Linear approach
, 27–29
Linear waste cycle
, 49–50
LIPOR
, 122
corporate governance experience of LIPOR in Portugal
, 66
experience
, 98
innovation at
, 113
in Porto
, 65
Waste Management Academy
, 122
Ljubljana model
, 24
Management models
, 63–74
Management team
, 80
Mechanical–biological treatment plant
, 55
Milan, from crisis to model
, 54–57
Minerva
, 7
Mixed ownership model
, 67
Multiple case design
, 4
Municipal corporation model
, 68
Municipal Department 48 (MA 48)
, 64–65
Municipal solid waste (MSW). See also Zero waste (ZW)
, 64–65
management
, 11–12
publicly owned start-up in
, 88
Municipal utilities
, 74
Municipal waste
generation
, 14–17
management system
, 38
treatment by incineration
, 25
and treatment in EU
, 19
utilities
, 67
Municipalities and waste firms
, 120
Municipally owned enterprises (MOEs)
, 67
National Innovation Agency (ANI)
, 113
National Packaging Consortium in Italy
, 74
National ZW Observatory
, 59
Neoliberal discourse
, 130
Nomination framework and practices
, 75
Nonbusiness Entity of Research and Innovation System (ENESII)
, 113
Nonpublic organization
, 125
Not In My Backyard syndrome (NIMBY syndrome)
, 119–120
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
, 11
Board of Directors good practices in
, 75
countries
, 75
Organized crime
, 117
Owner municipality
, 80
Ownership
, 3, 6, 10
firms with
, 3
role and potential impacts of different management models
, 63–74
Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)
, 8
Pay-as-you-throw (PAYT)
, 31
systems
, 40, 44, 58–59
tariffs
, 40, 106
Performance
of entrepreneurial actors
, 131
indicators
, 46
of public service operators
, 93
Petra Waste Benchmarking in Helsinki
, 30–31, 119
Point pricing systems based on PAYT principle
, 52
Policymakers
, 11
Polluter pays principle
, 40
Private management model
, 73
Privatization of public services
, 130
Professionalism
, 133
Project of ZW Research Center of Capannori
, 41
Proportionality
, 10
Public organization
, 125
Public ownership
, 132–133
Public policy development
, 51–52
Public procurement
, 44
Public sector organizations (PSOs)
, 97
Public service obligations (PSOs)
, 11
Public services
, 1, 9
in EU framework
, 9–10
provision
, 71, 93, 96
remunicipalization process in public service provision
, 82–92
Public shareholders
, 133
Public tenders
, 117
Publicly owned start-up in municipal solidwaste management
, 88
Publicly owned waste operators
, 133
Public–private conflict
, 72
Punctual rate
, 106
Quadrinomy
, 58
Radio-frequency identification (RFID)
, 106
Recovery and disposal methods
, 23
Recycling
, 37–38
municipalities of Legambiente
, 61–62
plants
, 114
of waste
, 22
Reduce and Recycle (Re. Re)
, 61
Reduction, recycling, and reuse
, 12
Regional Recycling Plant
, 31
Regional Waste Management Centre Ljubljana (RCERO Ljubljana)
, 23, 111
Remuneration
, 75
Remunicipalization process
, 82, 92, 130
Contarina SpA
, 85
publicly owned start-up in municipal solidwaste management
, 88
Research, Development, and Innovation Unit (UIDI)
, 113
Residents waste management in HSY
, 118
Residual separation and research facilities
, 39–40
Responsibility
, 114, 117, 131–133, 135
Retiambiente
, 69
Reuse, repair, and deconstruction step
, 37–38
Rossano Ercolini
, 59
“Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza”
, 56
Sector-specific sustainability
, 98
Separate collection of recycling materials
, 38
Separate collection systems
, 52
Separate waste collection
, 47
Services of General Economic Interest (SGEI)
, 10
Services of general interest (SGIs)
, 9–10
Sintesi Srl
, 58
Slovenia, urban waste management in
, 23
Small-sized public-owned firm
, 69
Snowball sampling technique
, 4
Social actors
, 4
Social contract
, 47
Social equity
, 96
Social innovation networks, ZW and
, 60–62
Social movement
, 46
Socio environmental responsibility
, 133
Soft laws
, 79
Solid Waste Association of North America
, 50
Solid waste production and disposal
, 11
Sorting Plant and Support Platforms
, 113
Sortti pick-up service
, 118
Source separation
, 37–38
Stakeholders
, 125
in circular economy practices
, 122
engagement
, 117, 122, 131–133, 136
State-owned enterprises (SOEs)
, 75, 79, 82
Subsidiarity
, 10
Survey on Local Infrastructures and Equipment
, 96
Sustainability
, 103
reports
, 99
environmental
, 96
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
, 98
Sustainable reporting
, 100
Sustainable urban solid waste management
, 103
innovation
, 104–114
knowledge sharing
, 123–127
responsibility
, 114–117
stakeholder engagement
, 117–122
Sustainable waste management system
, 6–7
Take–make–waste model (TMW model)
, 48, 53, 130
circular waste cycle
, 51–53
linear waste cycle
, 49–50
Tariff system
, 109
Technological developments
, 50
Technological innovations in waste treatment and recycling
, 44
Training programs
, 75
Triple bottom line approach (TBL approach)
, 3, 6, 96, 103, 134
circular economy in strategies and performance measurement
, 98
efficiency in urban waste management provision
, 94–95
performance of public service operators
, 93
sustainable reporting
, 100
Voka Snaga in Ljubljana, Slovenia
, 97
Unification process
, 1
Urban solid waste
collection and treatment
, 11
management systems
, 103
Urban waste generation
, 2
Urban waste management. See also Sustainable urban solid waste management
, 1–3, 11, 67, 115, 130
activities
, 63
activities in performance measurement
, 95
circular economy approach
, 27–36
in Europe
, 6, 9, 25
factors affecting efficiency in
, 94–95
operators
, 95
remunicipalization process in
, 82–92
zero waste strategy for municipalities throughout world
, 36–44
Urban waste services
, 63
Board of Directors and other corporate governance rules
, 74–82
corporate governance experience of LIPOR in Portugal
, 66
management models in public service provision
, 64
National Packaging Consortium in Italy
, 74
ownership role and potential impacts of different management models
, 63–74
remunicipalization process
, 82–92
small-sized public-owned firm
, 69
Valorization
, 131
Valpe Ambiente
, 84
Voka Snaga
, 24
in Ljubljana, Slovenia
, 97
pillars of good waste management for
, 32
Waste. See also Zero waste (ZW)
, 1–2, 51–52
collection and treatment systems
, 47
crisis in Milan
, 54
operators
, 96, 120
policy
, 2
privatization
, 130
reduction initiatives
, 2, 39–40
sector
, 2
separate waste collection
, 2
waste-to-energy plant
, 28
Waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE)
, 100
Waste Framework Directive
, 1–2
Waste management
, 1–2, 29–30, 94, 130
firms and municipalities
, 3
innovation in
, 110
professionals in
, 4
start-up for
, 7
system
, 45, 109, 1035
Waste Management Academy throughout Europe
, 122
Waste of electrical and electronic equipment waste (WEEE waste)
, 64–65, 106
Zero waste (ZW). See also Municipal solid waste (MSW)
, 23, 45–46, 48, 94–95, 131
approach
, 103
ASCIT Spa, Capannori, Italy
, 41
in Europe
, 4
framework
, 3, 6
in Italy
, 4, 53, 62
and social innovation networks
, 60–62
strategy for municipalities throughout world
, 36–44
thinking zero waste sociologically
, 46–48
TMW vs.
, 48–53
Zero waste Europe (ZWE)
, 53
Zero waste International Alliance (ZWIA)
, 52
- Prelims
- Introduction and Methodology
- 1 Urban Waste Management in Europe: Challenges and Opportunities
- 2 Zero Waste Genealogy: A Social Movement and the Italian Experience
- 3 The Ownership and Governance Models of Urban Waste Services
- 4 Measuring and Comparing Waste Management Performance in an Integrated View: The Triple Bottom Line Approach to Foster Sustainability
- 5 Key Drivers of Sustainable Urban Solid Waste Management
- Conclusion: Considering the Linkage between Ownership and Corporate Governance, Key Drivers of Good Waste Management and Performance under the Zero Waste Framework
- References
- Index