To read this content please select one of the options below:

Cancellation of urology operations

Jyoti Shah (Department of Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK)
Aamir Ansari (Department of Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK)
Joya Bhattacharyya (Department of Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK)

Clinical Governance: An International Journal

ISSN: 1477-7274

Article publication date: 1 April 2006

433

Abstract

Purpose

To establish the reasons for surgical cancellations in a urology department and to provide suggestions for their reduction.

Design/methodology/approach

Data for all patients who were cancelled between September 2004 and February 2005 were collected to determine the reasons for cancellations and the number of procedures cancelled on the day of surgery.

Findings

A total of 175 procedures were cancelled in a six‐month period, comprising 14.1 per cent of all elective operations scheduled. Of these, 25.7 per cent were cancelled on the day of surgery. The main reasons for cancellations were patients being unfit for surgery (20 per cent); patient reasons for cancellations, such as the date being inconvenient (20 per cent); operations no longer being necessary (16 per cent); and the surgeon being unavailable or unable to operate (10.3 per cent).

Originality/value

It is believed that at least 26 per cent of all cancellations are avoidable with simple strategies such as effective communication between surgeons and booking office staff. Other methods to reduce the number of cancellations are presented.

Keywords

Citation

Shah, J., Ansari, A. and Bhattacharyya, J. (2006), "Cancellation of urology operations", Clinical Governance: An International Journal, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 128-133. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777270610660501

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2006, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles