To read this content please select one of the options below:

Decentralising the NHS: rhetoric, reality and paradox

Maria Goddard (Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK)
Russell Mannion (Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK)

Journal of Health Organization and Management

ISSN: 1477-7266

Article publication date: 1 January 2006

2125

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this research is to examine the issues of decentralisation in the NHS.

Design/methodology/approach

Evidence was gathered from an empirical study in order to illustrate the effect of policy reform on relationships at both the central and the local level. In this paper issues were examined in the context of two reforms at the heart of the decentralisation agenda in the English NHS: earned autonomy and the introduction of foundation hospitals.

Findings

Past and current policy in the NHS reflects elements of both centralisation and decentralisation. The tension created by such opposing forces has an impact not only on inter‐organisational partnership working but also on the balance of power within local health economies.

Originality/value

Attempts to control the NHS exhibit unresolved contradictions and tensions. This research showed that the challenge for policymakers, managers and clinicians is to manage such tensions.

Keywords

Citation

Goddard, M. and Mannion, R. (2006), "Decentralising the NHS: rhetoric, reality and paradox", Journal of Health Organization and Management, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 67-73. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777260610656561

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2006, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles