To read this content please select one of the options below:

Assignment vs subletting: Do you care which you use? Why?

Philip G. Skinner (Arnall Golden Gregory LLP, 2800 One Atlantic Centre, 1201 West Peachtree Street, Atlanta, GA 30309‐3450, USA; Tel: +1 404 873 8798; Fax: +1 404 873 8799; e‐mail: Philip.Skinner@AGG.com)
Abe J. Schear (Arnall Golden Gregory LLP, 2800 One Atlantic Centre, 1201 West Peachtree Street, Atlanta, GA 30309‐3450, USA)
Seth S. Katz (Arnall Golden Gregory LLP, 2800 One Atlantic Centre, 1201 West Peachtree Street, Atlanta, GA 30309‐3450, USA)

Journal of Corporate Real Estate

ISSN: 1463-001X

Article publication date: 1 October 2002

487

Abstract

From time to time, clients ask counsel and brokers about the pros and cons of using an assignment versus a sublease to effect a transfer of possession and a transfer of obligations with respect to leased premises. With about equal frequency, questions come up regarding the differences between assignments and subleases, and ‘whether those differences really make a difference’ after all is said and done. While assignments and subleases are both means to achieve substantially similar ends, they do yield different legal and business results. The purpose of this paper is to explain and discuss some of the similarities and some of the distinctions between assignments and subleases, both from a legal perspective and from business and practical perspectives, and to discuss some of the reasons that the different parties involved in such transactions may prefer, or wish to select one of these transaction forms over the other.

Keywords

Citation

Skinner, P.G., Schear, A.J. and Katz, S.S. (2002), "Assignment vs subletting: Do you care which you use? Why?", Journal of Corporate Real Estate, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 357-364. https://doi.org/10.1108/14630010210811958

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2002, MCB UP Limited

Related articles