To read this content please select one of the options below:

A cross‐cultural investigation of work values among young executives in China and the USA

Yue Pan (University of Dayton, Dayton, Ohio, USA)
Xuebao Song (School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing, People's Republic of China)
Ayalla Goldschmidt (IBM Digital Media Solutions Marketing, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA)
Warren French (University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA)

Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal

ISSN: 1352-7606

Article publication date: 1 August 2010

4808

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the study is to investigate what values are now important to young American and Chinese managers, since they profile the direction in which their country is headed. It aims to explore if the ethical values of young executives in different countries are converging to a common global business culture. It also aims to argue that the individualism‐collectivism value dimension by itself does not capture the differences between the Chinese and American sample members. The vertical‐horizontal dimension, in contrast, seems to better delineate the value orientations among young executives in the two countries.

Design/methodology/approach

In this two‐phase study, both attitudinal and scenario‐based measurements are applied to assess the strength of work value orientations among similar subjects in China and the USA.

Findings

In study 1, Chinese respondents score significantly higher on a hierarchical‐vertical dimension than do the Americans, although the two groups do not differ significantly on the collectivism‐individualism dimension. In study 2, which entails resolving an ethical dilemma, the American subjects apply Egalitarianism as their most frequent expressed value, reflecting their horizontal perspective. The Chinese subjects, in contrast, rely strongly on a traditional vertical value system to resolve the ethical dilemma. Although both American and Chinese negotiators show a collectivist as well as an individualist orientation, their focuses are fundamentally different.

Originality/value

The well‐established collectivism/individualism cultural dimension has been heavily used in cross‐cultural studies, sometimes without much discretion. This study was undertaken as a preliminary attempt to outline the cultural patterns observed among young managers in America and China. The paper argues that cross‐cultural differences underlying ethical conflicts should not be reduced to the single value dimension of individualism/collectivism.

Keywords

Citation

Pan, Y., Song, X., Goldschmidt, A. and French, W. (2010), "A cross‐cultural investigation of work values among young executives in China and the USA", Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 283-298. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527601011068379

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2010, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles