To read this content please select one of the options below:

Adaptive, generative, and transformative learning in project teams

Valerie I. Sessa (Montclair State University, Montclair, New Jersey, USA)
Manuel London (State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York, USA)
Christopher Pingor (Montclair State University, Montclair, New Jersey, USA)
Beyza Gullu (Montclair State University, Montclair, New Jersey, USA)
Juhi Patel (Montclair State University, Montclair, New Jersey, USA)

Team Performance Management

ISSN: 1352-7592

Article publication date: 14 June 2011

2444

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study is to analyze a framework of team learning that includes three learning processes (adaptive, generative, and transformative), factors that stimulate these processes, and consequences of them. The variables provided a field study of the model.

Design/methodology/approach

In the field study, 69 project teams of 3 to 11 students and their instructors responded to surveys.

Findings

Positive learning stimuli were related to adaptive and generative learning processes, while negative stimuli were related to transformative learning processes. Learning processes were related to individual student learning outcomes. In addition, adaptive and generative learning processes were positively related to team and instructor ratings of outcome quality, while transformative learning was negatively related to team ratings of outcome quality.

Research limitations/implications

The results were subject to the following limitations: cross‐sectional design, mostly self‐report measures, and the lack of control endemic to field research. As such, this study is viewed as an initial test of the team‐learning model in a field setting. Additional research, including longitudinal designs and experimental designs, are called for.

Practical implications

This study adds to the growing literature on group learning. Educators and managers need to be aware that there are different kinds of learning processes in which groups can engage and that these are stimulated to occur differently and have a different impact on outcomes.

Originality/value

Team learning is rarely assessed directly as a construct in its own right and there is a lack of empirical support delineating causes and consequences of team learning. This field study is a first step in this direction.

Keywords

Citation

Sessa, V.I., London, M., Pingor, C., Gullu, B. and Patel, J. (2011), "Adaptive, generative, and transformative learning in project teams", Team Performance Management, Vol. 17 No. 3/4, pp. 146-167. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527591111143691

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2011, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles