Risky business: pre‐powdered gloves or powder‐free gloves in the operating suite?

Abstract

Two of the emerging issues for the health‐care sector in the 1990s are occupational health and safety, and iatrogenic issues. Both of these issues are implicated in the use of pre‐powdered latex gloves. Hospital healthcare workers are exposed to latex in many ways: gloves, intravenous sets, ventilator circuits, dental products, resuscitation equipment, anaesthetic equipment. Post‐operative complications, delayed wound healing, scar formation, and the potential for misdiagnosis, in the presence of starch powder, have been well documented in the literature with the need for thorough glove rinsing prior to surgery. Another route for glove powder to enter wounds is through a barrier breach. For an institution to ensure it provides the most durable and effective barrier for health‐care worker protection and patient safety, knowledge is needed regarding the various factors which lead to glove barrier failure. The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the in‐use durability of the surgical gloves in current use against powder‐free gloves. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data, in addition a cost analysis was calculated. The results of this study demonstrated clinically important differences between existing glove products in terms of barrier quality.

Citation

Spicer, M. and Richardson, M. (1998), "Risky business: pre‐powdered gloves or powder‐free gloves in the operating suite?", International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, Vol. 11 No. 6, pp. 204-210. https://doi.org/10.1108/09526869810231578