To read this content please select one of the options below:

Auditor and non‐mentor supervisor relationships: Effects of mentoring and organizational justice

Cathleen L. Miller (School of Business Administration, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA)
Philip H. Siegel (Hull School of Business, Augusta State University, Augusta, Georgia, USA)
Alan Reinstein (School of Business Administration, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA)

Managerial Auditing Journal

ISSN: 0268-6902

Article publication date: 4 January 2011

2473

Abstract

Purpose

This paper seeks to examine the effects of mentoring and organizational justice on auditors' relationships with their non‐mentor supervisors. While having a mentor should cause higher quality protégé auditors and their non‐mentor supervisor relationships, organizational justice perceptions should mediate this mentoring association. Thus, having a mentor should see higher procedural justice perceptions, which, in turn, should result in higher quality relationships between protégés and their non‐mentor supervisors.

Design/methodology/approach

A survey of 95 audit professionals shows that protégés report higher quality auditor‐supervisor relationships than do non‐protégés; however, having a mentor does not appear to be the determining factor.

Findings

Building on a prior study of Siegel et al., the paper finds that auditor attitudes towards the job (job satisfaction) and the firm (job commitment) eliminate the association between mentoring and quality of auditor‐supervisor relationships. Procedural justice, but not distributive justice, perceptions also mediate the relationship between job satisfaction and quality of auditor‐supervisor relationships. Procedural justice perceptions produce higher quality auditor‐supervisor relationships with non‐mentor supervisors.

Research limitations/implications

Using mediation regression techniques instead of the more stringent path analysis and using self‐reported survey data that derives a method variance could affect the generalizability of our results. Future research can correct these limitations.

Practical implications

The paper finds that while merely having a mentor need not improve relationships, mentoring programs can still greatly improve auditor‐supervisor relationships.

Originality/value

The paper includes implications for developing effective mentoring programs for CPA firms.

Keywords

Citation

Miller, C.L., Siegel, P.H. and Reinstein, A. (2011), "Auditor and non‐mentor supervisor relationships: Effects of mentoring and organizational justice", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 5-31. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686901111090817

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2011, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles