To read this content please select one of the options below:

Prioritising the safety management elements: A hierarchical analysis for manufacturing enterprises

W.K. Law (Department of Manufacturing Engineering and Engineering Management, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China)
A.H.S. Chan (Department of Manufacturing Engineering and Engineering Management, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China)
K.F. Pun (Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, The University of the West Indies, St Augustine, West Indies)

Industrial Management & Data Systems

ISSN: 0263-5577

Article publication date: 1 July 2006

3477

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to present a hierarchy decision model for assessing the priority of safety management elements in manufacturing enterprises with reference to three major industries (i.e. textile and clothing, electronics, and printing and publishing) in Hong Kong. The identification of core decision criteria and safety management elements were addressed with respect to the effective implementation of safety management systems (SMS) in manufacturing enterprises.

Design/methodology/approach

Empirical data were acquired via a conduct of personal interviews with evaluators (i.e. safety personnel, experts and professionals) in industry. Using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) methodology, a list of seven decision criteria and 13 safety management elements were identified and their relative importance were evaluated.

Findings

It was found that the top three criteria for SMS implementation were “client requirement” “insurance company requirement” and “employee requirement”. Both “safety organisation” and “safety policy” were the most important safe management elements. Besides, evaluators put greater concerns on “safe person” elements than “safe place” elements. Incorporating the AHP findings, a self‐regulatory approach to implementing safety management elements was proposed.

Research limitations/implications

The hierarchy decision model would enable manufacturing enterprises to focus their resources on the critical elements at a time, to improve the effectiveness of SMS implementation. Future study could validate the applicability of the model and the self‐regulatory approach in large enterprises and small to medium‐sized enterprises, separately and collectively.

Practical implications

Using the AHP methodology, safety personnel could evaluate the relative importance of decision criteria and safety management elements with respect to the corporate goals, resources and constraints of their respective organisations.

Originality/value

The hierarchy decision model presented would enable manufacturing enterprises to determine the relative importance of decision criteria and safety management elements and to establish viable strategies for SMS implementation.

Keywords

Citation

Law, W.K., Chan, A.H.S. and Pun, K.F. (2006), "Prioritising the safety management elements: A hierarchical analysis for manufacturing enterprises", Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 106 No. 6, pp. 778-792. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570610671470

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2006, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles