Ambidexterity and total quality management: towards a research agenda

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the paper is to expand on the existing theory of ambidexterity by analysing its implications for organisations that employ total quality management.

Design/methodology/approach

The analysis of relevant theoretical and empirical studies on ambidexterity and total quality management enables us to reflect on the common elements, facilitating factors and synergy that exists between both fields.

Findings

Thanks to the synergy between its principles and practices, total quality management can act as a platform in creating an ambidextrous context, in addition to generating ambidextrous management capabilities and ambidextrous organisational skills. However, no relationship has been found between the application of TQM and structural ambidexterity.

Research limitations/implications

An analysis of existing studies has enabled the extraction of some proposals which could be used in future research.

Practical implications

The synergy between TQM principles and practices, their disparate influence on ambidexterity, the range and depth of applying TQM principles and practices – above all those that are included in a human context and the opening of new markets – means that these factors are key elements to bear in mind for those organisations that wish to maximise the potential of TQM in order to foster ambidexterity.

Social implications

Given the extent to which this type of management has been applied over the last 20 years the social impact of this study is relevant.

Originality/value

This study opens up a new line of research into ambidexterity and, despite the subject having been analysed extensively in conceptual and empirical terms, until now its relationship with total quality management has yet remained unexplored.

Citation

Moreno Luzon, M.D. and Valls Pasola, J. (2011), "Ambidexterity and total quality management: towards a research agenda", Management Decision, Vol. 49 No. 6, pp. 927-947. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111143612