Absence Makes the Heart Grow Fonder: Dead Souls, Phantom Clients and the Modern Class Action

Abstract

All clients are to some extent subject to their attorney's construction of their interests. This state of affairs reaches the extreme in the case of the class action because the class action permits masses of individual claims to be combined in one proceeding to promote efficiency and solve collective action problems. Class action scholars have long debated the role of class members without conclusion. The doctrine on whether and when the class member is considered a “party” to the litigation is incoherent. Neither courts nor commentators are clear on limits of the ethical duty of class counsel – does it run to individual class members or to the class as a whole? And if such a duty runs to the class as a whole, is the class an entity, like a corporation, or an aggregation of individuals each of whom is entitled to enforce class counsel's attorney–client obligations?

Citation

Lahav, A.D. (2007), "Absence Makes the Heart Grow Fonder: Dead Souls, Phantom Clients and the Modern Class Action", Sarat, A. (Ed.) Studies in Law, Politics and Society (Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, Vol. 40), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 153-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1059-4337(06)40006-5