To read this content please select one of the options below:

A REVIEW OF THE THEORIES OF AND EVIDENCE ON RETURNS RELATED TO MERGERS AND TAKEOVERS.

Ike Mathur (Professor of Finance, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois,U.S.A.)
Soumendra De (Assistant Professor of Finance, University of Evansville, Evansville, Indiana, U.S.A.)

Managerial Finance

ISSN: 0307-4358

Article publication date: 1 April 1989

628

Abstract

The market for mergers and takeovers, often referred to as the market for corporate control [Manne (1965)], has always attracted the attention of investors and researchers because takeovers represent corporate investment decisions on a scale several times larger than the normal, ongoing, growth‐maintaining capital outlays by the typical value‐maximising firm. Although the theoretical justifications for such corporate actions are reasonably well understood, the true motives for the mergers and the strategies adopted by acquiring firms to consummate them can be complex and diverse in scope. Corporate acquisitions can therefore have widespread effects on the wealth of various groups of agents involved in the market for corporate control.

Citation

Mathur, I. and De, S. (1989), "A REVIEW OF THE THEORIES OF AND EVIDENCE ON RETURNS RELATED TO MERGERS AND TAKEOVERS.", Managerial Finance, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb013617

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1989, MCB UP Limited

Related articles