To read this content please select one of the options below:

A systematic review and meta-analysis of data use professional development interventions

Muhammad Fauzan Ansyari (Faculty of Business and Economics, Maastricht Graduate School of Governance, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands) (Faculty of Education and Teacher Training, State Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia)
Wim Groot (Faculty of Business and Economics, Maastricht Graduate School of Governance, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands)
Kristof De Witte (Faculty of Business and Economics, Maastricht Graduate School of Governance, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands) (Leuven Economics of Education Research, Faculty of Economics and Business, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium)

Journal of Professional Capital and Community

ISSN: 2056-9548

Article publication date: 21 June 2022

Issue publication date: 14 July 2022

337

Abstract

Purpose

Professional development interventions (PDIs) are crucial for equipping teachers to use data effectively. Relying on previous studies reporting on such interventions, this paper aims to identify and synthesise the goals, dimensions and conditions of PDIs for data use. This paper also examines the evidence of the effect of such interventions on student outcomes.

Design/methodology/approach

In this study, the authors employ a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to analyse teacher PDIs for data use.

Findings

The results suggest that conceptual, practical and continual goals are identified in data use PDIs. Supported by conceptual, practical or normative tools, facilitators employ a variety of techniques in facilitating teachers’ data use through data teams or professional learning communities. The facilitation techniques include assessing needs, using models or modelling, observing performance, providing feedback, providing built-in time for reflection and brokering. Further, the results highlight the influence of several conditions that contribute to the success of the interventions. Finally, the meta-analysis shows a significant positive effect of the interventions on student outcomes, with an effect size of 0.17.

Research limitations/implications

The authors' proposed framework should be empirically tested and validated through field studies in various contexts. Since the authors focussed on studies reporting data use PDIs for instructional purposes as well as providing the descriptions of the PDIs, the number of included studies was only 27 and represented only four countries. Of the 27, 10 studies were used for the meta-analysis and the results may be subject to publication bias. Seemingly, the result may be related to the authors' inclusion/exclusion criteria that only included peer-reviewed journal articles and excluded non-peer-reviewed studies such as theses or dissertations. This criterion potentially neglected some relevant studies.

Practical implications

Policymakers interested in developing a data use PDI should take into account the various goals of data use PDIs, depending on policymakers' interests. Building teachers’ understanding of data use can be addressed by the practical goals. This can be conducted within a short period of time through training or courses, either in-person or online. This is appropriate for an initiation strategy for data use within schools. However, targeting specific skills and dispositional attributes around data use should adopt practical and continual goals. These types of goals require a PDI with a sustained duration embedded in teachers’ classroom practices; therefore, political and practical support is necessary.

Social implications

The authors argue that the review findings contribute to knowledge and insights by presenting data use PDIs that support teacher learning, implementation and sustainability of data use practices.

Originality/value

This article provides a proposed framework for studying teacher PDIs for data use and sheds light on several goals, a variety of facilitation strategies and conditions and the effect of the interventions on student outcomes.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This study was sponsored by (overseas) 5000 Doctoral Programme, Ministry of Religious Affairs, Indonesia. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the sponsor.

Citation

Ansyari, M.F., Groot, W. and De Witte, K. (2022), "A systematic review and meta-analysis of data use professional development interventions", Journal of Professional Capital and Community, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 256-289. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-09-2021-0055

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles