To read this content please select one of the options below:

Mapping the interrelationships between community assets

Matthew Q. McPherson (School of Business Administration, Gonzaga University, Spokane, Washington, USA)
Daniel Friesner (College of Health Professions, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, USA)
Carl S. Bozman (School of Business Administration, Gonzaga University, Spokane, Washington, USA)

International Journal of Social Economics

ISSN: 0306-8293

Article publication date: 25 August 2020

Issue publication date: 13 October 2020

380

Abstract

Purpose

Community asset mapping (CAM) is an evidence-based activity commonly used in local socioeconomic development initiatives. Residents and other stakeholders collaboratively identify the resources that they deem most important to the vitality of their community. Results are depicted qualitatively using maps. While maps are a useful means to convey information, alternate approaches to summarize data drawn from CAM activities may yield additional inferences that better inform community development initiatives.

Design/methodology/approach

This study conducted a retrospective analysis of secondary, de-identified data collected from the 2015–2016 Gonzaga University Logan Neighborhood Asset Mapping Project. Hierarchical and nonhierarchical cluster analyses were used to establish interrelationships between the perceived importance of various community assets.

Findings

The hierarchical cluster analysis revealed a very intuitive hierarchical clustering of community assets, with various health care services tightly clustered together. Similarly, farmers’ markets, community gardens and meeting spaces were clustered closely together. Third, community education and care services for all age groups were clustered together. The nonhierarchical cluster analysis revealed intuitive clustering of respondent groups who valued particular sets of assets.

Originality/value

By identifying these clusters and characterizing the linkages between them, it is possible to fund multiple development initiatives that are mutually reinforcing. For example, if the neighborhood obtains funds to invest, then they could be used to facilitate both community gardens and farmers’ markets, two closely related activities. Additional physical locations might also be developed to support (possibly outdoor) meeting space.

Peer review

The peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/IJSE-04-2020-0206.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the students, staff, faculty, and administrators who participated in, and provided support for, the Gonzaga University Logan Neighborhood Asset Mapping Project, whose data form the basis for this manuscript. We thank Gonzaga University for providing access to the data used in this manuscript.

Citation

McPherson, M.Q., Friesner, D. and Bozman, C.S. (2020), "Mapping the interrelationships between community assets", International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 47 No. 10, pp. 1299-1309. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-04-2020-0206

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles