To read this content please select one of the options below:

Mechanisms of affinity fraud victimization

Thomas Dearden (Department of Sociology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA)
Jill O. Jasperson (Woodbury School of Business, Organizational Leadership, Utah Valley University, Orem, Utah, USA)
Ronald Mellado Miller (Woodbury School of Business, Management and Strategic Operations, Utah Valley University, Orem, Utah, USA)

Journal of Financial Crime

ISSN: 1359-0790

Article publication date: 8 May 2024

9

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to investigate the relationship between religiosity, belief in a just world (BJW), trust and affinity fraud.

Design/methodology/approach

Using an online panel vendor, this study collected survey data from 1,030 participants. Participants are balanced based on US Census data.

Findings

This study finds evidence that religiosity and, to a lesser extent, trust were correlated with choosing an affinity investor but not BJW. Overall, this study adds to the literature on fraud by examining the potential processes of tricking a victim.

Originality/value

This study examines the complex decision-making around investing with fraudsters. This study disentangles the relationship between affinity fraud, decision-making, trust and religiosity. Furthermore, this consider the reasons why a shared affinity may increase trust through the lens of the decision-maker.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Disclosure statement: The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.

Citation

Dearden, T., Jasperson, J.O. and Miller, R.M. (2024), "Mechanisms of affinity fraud victimization", Journal of Financial Crime, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-01-2024-0017

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2024, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles